Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rodolfo Betancourt

dblp:178/4018 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1971
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011971
Derivation of Minimum Test Sets for Unate Logical Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › fault detection
stuck-at fault detection
0.011971
Derivation of Minimum Test Sets for Unate Logical Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test
test generation
0.011971
Derivation of Minimum Test Sets for Unate Logical Circuits · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimum sum-of-products · 0.0karnaugh map · 0.0hasse diagram · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1971 Derivation of Minimum Test Sets for Unate Logical Circuits
abstract
A derivation of test sets S0and S1for irredundant unate logical circuits is presented. It is shown that these sets (S0and S1, respectively) detect all stuck-at-0 and stuck-at-1 faults in all realizations with no internal inverters of a given unate function. They can be obtained easily from the minimum sum and minimum product forms, from a Karnaugh map, or from a Hasse diagram of the function. These sets are minimum in the sense that there is no set with a smaller number of elements that detects all faults in the class of realizations of a logical function. In particular, it is found that a two-level AND–OR (OR–AND) network needs all the tests in S0(S1).
Rodolfo Betancourt
IEEE Trans. Computers1