Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Donald C. Jessep

dblp:178/4067 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1971
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance · 33% Electronic design automation · 33% Distributed systems · 33%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Electronic design automation › hardware verification and test › design for testability
built-in self-test
0.011971
A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
failure recovery
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.011971
A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
reliability modeling
0.011971
Reliability Modeling for Fault-Tolerant Computers · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Hardware reliability and fault tolerance
self-checking circuits
0.011971
A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Operating systems › system architecture
hardware-software interface
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971
Operating systems › fault tolerance
system recovery
0.011971
Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery · IEEE Trans. Computers 1971

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

self-checking logic design · 0.0recovery control unit · 0.0mathematical reliability modeling · 0.0audit routines · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1971 Reliability Modeling for Fault-Tolerant Computers
abstract
Reliability modeling and the mathematical equations involved are discussed for general computer systems organized to be fault tolerant. This paper summarizes the work done over the last four years on mathematical reliability modeling by the authors.
Willard G. Bouricius, William C. Carter, Donald C. Jessep, Peter R. Schneider, Aspi B. Wadia
IEEE Trans. Computers3
1971 A Simple Self-Testing Decoder Checking Circuit
abstract
A method is given of designing a simple self-checking and self-testing decoder checking circuit which uses much less circuitry than previous checkers. An analysis is given of the circuit savings and of the probability of erroneous decoder operation before error detection.
William C. Carter, Keith A. Duke, Donald C. Jessep
IEEE Trans. Computers3
1971 Logic Design for Dynamic and Interactive Recovery
abstract
Recovery in a fault-tolerant computer means the continuation of system operation with data integrity after an error occurs. This paper delineates two parallel concepts embodied in the hardware and software functions required for recovery; detection, diagnosis, and reconfiguration for hardware, data integrity, checkpointing, and restart for the software. The hardware relies on the recovery variable set, checking circuits, and diagnostics, and the software relies on the recovery information set, audit, and reconstruct routines, to characterize the system state and assist in recovery when required. Of particular utility is a handware unit, the recovery control unit, which serves as an interface between error detection and software recovery programs in the supervisor and provides dynamic interactive recovery.
William C. Carter, Donald C. Jessep, Aspi B. Wadia, Peter R. Schneider, Willard G. Bouricius
IEEE Trans. Computers2