VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jianqiao Wangni
dblp:178/8573
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-4454-1744ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 3 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Generative modeling · 43% Representation and self-supervised learning · 26% Optimization for machine learning · 21% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 18, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Relay Diffusion: Unifying diffusion process across resolutions for image synthesis · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › text-to-image generation
high-resolution image synthesis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Relay Diffusion: Unifying diffusion process across resolutions for image synthesis · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Normalized Diversification · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Normalized Diversification · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › generative adversarial network › GAN training
mode collapse |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Normalized Diversification · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › distributed optimization
communication-efficient distributed optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimization · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimization · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
regularized optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Orthant-Wise Passive Descent Algorithms for Training L1-Regularized Models · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed Optimization · NeurIPS 2018 |
Mathematical optimization
gradient descent |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Orthant-Wise Passive Descent Algorithms for Training L1-Regularized Models · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
dimensionality reduction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nonlinear Feature Extraction with Max-Margin Data Shifting · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › feature extraction
discriminant feature extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nonlinear Feature Extraction with Max-Margin Data Shifting · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
feature extraction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nonlinear Feature Extraction with Max-Margin Data Shifting · AAAI 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Nonlinear Feature Extraction with Max-Margin Data Shifting · AAAI 2016 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis › human pose estimation › articulated pose estimation
hand pose estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Normalized Diversification · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
large margin methods |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Nonlinear Feature Extraction with Max-Margin Data Shifting · AAAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
blurring diffusion · 0.8block noise · 0.8orthant-wise passive descent · 0.7pairwise distance · 0.4interpolation · 0.4adversarial learning · 0.4gradient sparsification · 0.3convex optimization formulation · 0.3large margin classifier · 0.2kernel trick · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Relay Diffusion: Unifying diffusion process across resolutions for image synthesisabstractDiffusion models achieved great success in image synthesis, but still face challenges in high-resolution generation. Through the lens of discrete cosine transformation, we find the main reason is that *the same noise level on a higher resolution results in a higher Signal-to-Noise Ratio in the frequency domain*. In this work, we present Relay Diffusion Model (RDM), which transfers a low-resolution image or noise into an equivalent high-resolution one for diffusion model via blurring diffusion and block noise. Therefore, the diffusion process can continue seamlessly in any new resolution or model without restarting from pure noise or low-resolution conditioning. RDM achieves state-of-the-art FID on CelebA-HQ and sFID on ImageNet 256$\times$256, surpassing previous works such as ADM, LDM and DiT by a large margin. All the codes and checkpoints are open-sourced at \url{https://github.com/THUDM/RelayDiffusion}. Jiayan Teng, Wendi Zheng, Ming Ding 0004, Wenyi Hong, Jianqiao Wangni, Zhuoyi Yang, Jie Tang 0001 |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2021 | Towards Statistically Provable Geometric 3D Human Pose RecoveryabstractRecovering three-dimensional (3D) structures such as object poses from limited two-dimensional (2D) information is an important research problem in computer vision, graphics, and robotics. The estimation of object pose from single images or multiple casual images could be ill-conditioned math problems. There is a popular family of algorithms of geometric sparse representation for 3D pose recovery (GSR-3D) that pretrains an overcomplete dictionary of 3D basis poses $B$, and then matches the detected 2D object pose $Y$ by jointly estimating the transformation $R$, projection $\Pi,$ and combination coefficients $c$, assuming $Y \approx \Pi \sum_i c_i R B_i$. In this paper, we make the first step of analyzing to which extent could we solve this ill-conditioned problem, and of understanding how the recovery error is affected by fundamental factors, e.g., dictionary size, observation noise, and running time. As these factors are implicit in objective functions, we analyze with the help of various sparse regularizers and a multistage optimizer, and prove that the recovery error $\mathcal L(l)$ decays w.r.t. the number of stages $l$ with a high probability, $Prob\left(\mathcal L(l) < \rho^{l-1} \mathcal L(0) + \delta \right) \geq 1- \epsilon$, where the constants $0< \rho <1, 0<\delta, 0<\epsilon \ll 1$ are related to the aforementioned factors. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first theoretical analysis in this line of research. Experiments are conducted to support our improvement upon previous regularization within the same framework. This will further characterize the trade-off between speed and accuracy towards real-time geometric inference in applications. Jianqiao Wangni, Dahua Lin, Kostas Daniilidis, Jianbo Shi |
SIAM J. Imaging Sci. | 1 |
| 2019 | Normalized DiversificationabstractGenerating diverse yet specific data is the goal of the generative adversarial network (GAN), but it suffers from the problem of mode collapse. We introduce the concept of normalized diversity which force the model to preserve the normalized pairwise distance between the sparse samples from a latent parametric distribution and their corresponding high-dimensional outputs. The normalized diversification aims to unfold the manifold of unknown topology and non-uniform distribution, which leads to safe interpolation between valid latent variables. By alternating the maximization over the pairwise distance and updating the total distance (normalizer), we encourage the model to actively explore in the high-dimensional output space. We demonstrate that by combining the normalized diversity loss and the adversarial loss, we generate diverse data without suffering from mode collapsing. Experimental results show that our method achieves consistent improvement on unsupervised image generation, conditional image generation and hand pose estimation over strong baselines. Shaohui Liu, Jianqiao Wangni, Jianbo Shi |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2018 | Orthant-Wise Passive Descent Algorithms for Training L1-Regularized Models
Jianqiao Wangni |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2018 | Gradient Sparsification for Communication-Efficient Distributed OptimizationabstractModern large-scale machine learning applications require stochastic optimization algorithms to be implemented on distributed computational architectures. A key bottleneck is the communication overhead for exchanging information such as stochastic gradients among different workers. In this paper, to reduce the communication cost, we propose a convex optimization formulation to minimize the coding length of stochastic gradients. The key idea is to randomly drop out coordinates of the stochastic gradient vectors and amplify the remaining coordinates appropriately to ensure the sparsified gradient to be unbiased. To solve the optimal sparsification efficiently, several simple and fast algorithms are proposed for an approximate solution, with a theoretical guarantee for sparseness. Experiments on $\ell_2$ regularized logistic regression, support vector machines, and convolutional neural networks validate our sparsification approaches. Jianqiao Wangni, Tong Zhang 0001 |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2016 | Nonlinear Feature Extraction with Max-Margin Data ShiftingabstractFeature extraction is an important task in machine learning. In this paper, we present a simple and efficient method, named max-margin data shifting (MMDS), to process the data before feature extraction. By relying on a large-margin classifier, MMDS is helpful to enhance the discriminative ability of subsequent feature extractors. The kernel trick can be applied to extract nonlinear features from input data. We further analyze in detail the example of principal component analysis (PCA). The empirical results on multiple linear and nonlinear models demonstrate that MMDS can efficiently improve the performance of unsupervised extractors. Jianqiao Wangni |
AAAI | 1 |