Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aditya Kamath
dblp:178/8701
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-1424-8248ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Computational complexity · 33% Automated reasoning and model checking · 33% Logic in computer science · 33% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational complexity
constraint satisfaction |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Scaling Relational Inference Using Proofs and Refutations · AAAI 2016 |
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning
grounding |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Scaling Relational Inference Using Proofs and Refutations · AAAI 2016 |
Automated reasoning and model checking
relational reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Scaling Relational Inference Using Proofs and Refutations · AAAI 2016 |
Program analysis
static analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Scaling Relational Inference Using Proofs and Refutations · AAAI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proof and refutation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Scaling Relational Inference Using Proofs and RefutationsabstractMany inference problems are naturally formulated using hard and soft constraints over relational domains: the desired solution must satisfy the hard constraints, while optimizing the objectives expressed by the soft constraints. Existing techniques for solving such constraints rely on efficiently grounding a sufficient subset of constraints that is tractable to solve. We present an eager-lazy grounding algorithm that eagerly exploits proofs and lazily refutes counterexamples. We show that our algorithm achieves significant speedup over existing approaches without sacrificing soundness for real-world applications from information retrieval and program analysis. Ravi Mangal, Xin Zhang 0035, Aditya Kamath, Aditya V. Nori, Mayur Naik |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2016 | A crowdsourced approach to student engagement recognition in e-learning environmentsabstractMassive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have initiated a revolution in higher education by providing opportunities for interested students to learn from the comfort of their individual locations at their desired pace. However, an important and highly successful aspect of traditional classroom education/pedagogy, which is modulating content delivery based on understanding real-time student feedback, is conspicuously missing in such e-learning environments. We aim to bridge this gap by proposing a system for automatic recognition of students engagement levels during e-learning sessions, using a crowdsourced discriminative learning approach. The key contributions of this work include a custom dataset for engagement recognition that will be made publicly available with corresponding crowdsourced non-aggregated labels, as well as a novel instance-weighted Multiple Kernel Learning SVM method that can directly consider vote distributions from crowdsourcing platforms in the learning methodology. Our results showed a 14% improvement on the dataset against traditional methods, and a 46% improvement when the most ambiguous class from the dataset is ignored, corroborating the promise of the method. Aditya Kamath, Aradhya Biswas, Vineeth N. Balasubramanian |
WACV | 1 |