Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Te-Yuan Chen
dblp:179/5356
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Language models and text generation · 13% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › semantic interpretation
text comprehension |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
context-aware generation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
GPT-2 · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 | Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text ComprehensionabstractInquisitive probing questions come naturally to humans in a variety of settings, but is a challenging task for automatic systems.One natural type of question to ask tries to fill a gap in knowledge during text comprehension, like reading a news article: we might ask about background information, deeper reasons behind things occurring, or more.Despite recent progress with data-driven approaches, generating such questions is beyond the range of models trained on existing datasets.We introduce INQUISITIVE, a dataset of ∼19K questions that are elicited while a person is reading through a document.Compared to existing datasets, INQUISITIVE questions target more towards high-level (semantic and discourse) comprehension of text.We show that readers engage in a series of pragmatic strategies to seek information.Finally, we evaluate question generation models based on GPT-2 (Radford et al., 2019) and show that our model is able to generate reasonable questions although the task is challenging, and highlight the importance of context to generate INQUIS-ITIVE questions. Wei-Jen Ko, Te-Yuan Chen, Yiyan Huang, Greg Durrett, Junyi Jessy Li |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |