Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Te-Yuan Chen

dblp:179/5356 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Question answering and dialogue systems · 44% Information extraction and text analysis · 44% Language models and text generation · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
question generation
0.412020
Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › natural language semantics › semantic interpretation
text comprehension
0.412020
Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
context-aware generation
0.112020
Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension · EMNLP (1) 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

GPT-2 · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 Inquisitive Question Generation for High Level Text Comprehension
abstract
Inquisitive probing questions come naturally to humans in a variety of settings, but is a challenging task for automatic systems.One natural type of question to ask tries to fill a gap in knowledge during text comprehension, like reading a news article: we might ask about background information, deeper reasons behind things occurring, or more.Despite recent progress with data-driven approaches, generating such questions is beyond the range of models trained on existing datasets.We introduce INQUISITIVE, a dataset of ∼19K questions that are elicited while a person is reading through a document.Compared to existing datasets, INQUISITIVE questions target more towards high-level (semantic and discourse) comprehension of text.We show that readers engage in a series of pragmatic strategies to seek information.Finally, we evaluate question generation models based on GPT-2 (Radford et al., 2019) and show that our model is able to generate reasonable questions although the task is challenging, and highlight the importance of context to generate INQUIS-ITIVE questions.
Wei-Jen Ko, Te-Yuan Chen, Yiyan Huang, Greg Durrett, Junyi Jessy Li
EMNLP (1)2