Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Okan Kolak
dblp:18/2165
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Machine translation · 77% Information extraction and text analysis · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Machine translation
annotation projection |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Evaluating Translational Correspondence using Annotation Projection · ACL 2002 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing
dependency parsing |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | Evaluating Translational Correspondence using Annotation Projection · ACL 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
parse projection · 0.0link analysis · 0.0citation analysis · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Bootstrapping parsers via syntactic projection across parallel textsabstractBroad coverage, high quality parsers are available for only a handful of languages. A prerequisite for developing broad coverage parsers for more languages is the annotation of text with the desired linguistic representations (also known as “treebanking”). However, syntactic annotation is a labor intensive and time-consuming process, and it is difficult to find linguistically annotated text in sufficient quantities. In this article, we explore using parallel text to help solving the problem of creating syntactic annotation in more languages. The central idea is to annotate the English side of a parallel corpus, project the analysis to the second language, and then train a stochastic analyzer on the resulting noisy annotations. We discuss our background assumptions, describe an initial study on the “projectability” of syntactic relations, and then present two experiments in which stochastic parsers are developed with minimal human intervention via projection from English. Rebecca Hwa, Philip Resnik, Amy Weinberg, Clara I. Cabezas, Okan Kolak |
Nat. Lang. Eng. | 5 |
| 2003 | A Generative Probabilistic OCR Model for NLP Applications
Okan Kolak, William J. Byrne, Philip Resnik |
HLT-NAACL | 1 |
| 2002 | Evaluating Translational Correspondence using Annotation ProjectionabstractRecently, statistical machine translation models have begun to take advantage of higher level linguistic structures such as syntactic dependencies. Underlying these models is an assumption about the directness of translational correspondence between sentences in the two languages; however, the extent to which this assumption is valid and useful is not well understood. In this paper, we present an empirical study that quantifies the degree to which syntactic dependencies are preserved when parses are projected directly from English to Chinese. Our results show that although the direct correspondence assumption is often too restrictive, a small set of principled, elementary linguistic transformations can boost the quality of the projected Chinese parses by 76% relative to the unimproved baseline. Rebecca Hwa, Philip Resnik, Amy Weinberg, Okan Kolak |
ACL | 4 |
| 2002 | Automating extraction of logical domains in a web site
Necip Fazil Ayan, Wen-Syan Li, Okan Kolak |
Data Knowl. Eng. | 3 |
| 2001 | Constructing multi-granular and topic-focused web site mapsabstractSite maps are essential to assist users in navigating a Web site. Most of the site maps are constructed manually and are static. However, di erent users may have di erent preferences and purposes for using a Web site. For example, a user may want to see a more detailed map while another user prefers a more abstract map. Two users looking for di erent topics at a large portal site would bene t more from two site maps with di erent focuses than a single map. In this paper, we present a technique for automatically constructing multi-granular and topic-focused site maps by utilizing directory paths, page contents, and link structures. In these site maps, the Web site topology is preserved and document importance, indicated by citation and semantic relevancy to user's topics of interest, is used for prioritizing the presentation of pages and directories. Experiments on real Web data have been conducted to validate the usefulness of the technique. Wen-Syan Li, Necip Fazil Ayan, Okan Kolak, Quoc Vu, Hajime Takano, Hisashi Shimamura |
WWW | 3 |