VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Irving Elshoff
dblp:18/237
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1988
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Programming languages and type systems · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Programming languages and type systems
distributed programming languages |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | An Overview of the SR Language and Implementation · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1988 |
Distributed systems
distributed programming |
0.0 | 1 | 1988 | An Overview of the SR Language and Implementation · ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 1988 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
semaphores · 0.0rendez-vous · 0.0remote procedure call · 0.0multicast · 0.0asynchronous message passing · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1988 | An Overview of the SR Language and ImplementationabstractSR is a language for programming distributed systems ranging from operating systems to application programs. On the basis of our experience with the initial version, the language has evolved considerably. In this paper we describe the current version of SR and give an overview of its implementation. The main language constructs are still resources and operations. Resources encapsulate processes and variables that they share; operations provide the primary mechanism for process interaction. One way in which SR has changed is that both resources and processes are now created dynamically. Another change is that inheritance is supported. A third change is that the mechanisms for operation invocation—call and send—and operation implementation—proc and in—have been extended and integrated. Consequently, all of local and remote procedure call, rendezvous, dynamic process creation, asynchronous message passing, multicast, and semaphores are supported. We have found this flexibility to be very useful for distributed programming. Moreover, by basing SR on a small number of well-integrated concepts, the language has proved easy to learn and use, and it has a reasonably efficient implementation. Gregory R. Andrews, Ronald A. Olsson, Michael H. Coffin, Irving Elshoff, Kelvin D. Nilsen, Titus D. M. Purdin, Gregg M. Townsend |
ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. | 4 |