Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Cosimo Palmisano

dblp:18/768 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data mining · 68% Information retrieval · 26% Web and social media mining · 6%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data mining › behavior modeling
customer behavior modeling
0.122008
Using Context to Improve Predictive Modeling of Customers in Personalization Applications · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008
Personalization in Context: Does Context Matter When Building Personalized Customer Models? · ICDM 2006
Information retrieval › user interaction
personalization
0.122008
Personalization in Context: Does Context Matter When Building Personalized Customer Models? · ICDM 2006
Using Context to Improve Predictive Modeling of Customers in Personalization Applications · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008
Data mining
predictive modeling
0.112008
Using Context to Improve Predictive Modeling of Customers in Personalization Applications · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2008

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

contextual information modeling · 0.1contextual modeling · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Using context to improve the effectiveness of segmentation and targeting in e-commerce
Maria Francesca Faraone, Michele Gorgoglione, Cosimo Palmisano, Umberto Panniello
Expert Syst. Appl.3
2009 Experimental comparison of pre- vs. post-filtering approaches in context-aware recommender systems
abstract
Recently, methods for generating context-aware recommendations were classified into the pre-filtering, post-filtering and contextual modeling approaches. Although some of these methods have been studied independently, no prior research compared the performance of these methods to determine which of them is better than the others. This paper focuses on comparing the pre-filtering and the post-filtering approaches and identifying which method dominates the other and under which circumstances. Since there are no clear winners in this comparison, we propose an alternative more effective method of selecting the winners in the pre- vs. the post-filtering comparison. This strategy provides analysts and companies with a practical suggestion on how to pick a good pre- or post-filtering approach in an effective manner to improve performance of a context-aware recommender system.
Umberto Panniello, Alexander Tuzhilin, Michele Gorgoglione, Cosimo Palmisano, Anto Pedone
RecSys4
2008 Using Context to Improve Predictive Modeling of Customers in Personalization Applications
abstract
The idea that context is important when predicting customer behavior has been maintained by scholars in marketing and data mining. However, no systematic study measuring how much the contextual information really matters in building customer models in personalization applications has been done before. In this paper, we study how important the contextual information is when predicting customer behavior and how to use it when building customer models. It is done by conducting an empirical study across a wide range of experimental conditions. The experimental results show that context does matter when modeling the behavior of individual customers and that it is possible to infer the context from the existing data with reasonable accuracy in certain cases. It is also shown that significant performance improvements can be achieved if the context is "cleverly" modeled, as described in this paper. These findings have significant implications for data miners and marketers. They show that contextual information does matter in personalization and companies have different opportunities to both make context valuable for improving predictive performance of customers' behavior and decreasing the costs of gathering contextual information.
Cosimo Palmisano, Alexander Tuzhilin, Michele Gorgoglione
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2006 Personalization in Context: Does Context Matter When Building Personalized Customer Models?
abstract
The idea that context is important when predicting customer behavior has been maintained by scholars in marketing and data mining. However, no systematic study measuring how much the contextual information really matters in building customer models in personalization applications have been done before. In this paper, we address this problem. To this aim, we collected data containing rich contextual information by developing a special-purpose browser to help users to navigate a well- known e-commerce retail portal and purchase products on its site. The experimental results show that context does matter for the case of modeling behavior of individual customers. The granularity of contextual information also matters, and the effect of contextual information gets diluted during the process of aggregating customers' data.
Michele Gorgoglione, Cosimo Palmisano, Alexander Tuzhilin
ICDM2
2006 Employee Profiling in the Total Reward Management
Silverio Petruzzellis, Oriana Licchelli, Ignazio Palmisano, Valeria Bavaro, Cosimo Palmisano
ISMIS5