Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Patrick Lehnen

dblp:18/8162 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
20ranked-venue papers
6as first author
3since 2021 · last 2021
0009-0004-9156-4297ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 5 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 14 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Speech recognition and synthesis · 41% Question answering and dialogue systems · 38% Reinforcement learning · 11%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Audio and music processing · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis
spoken language understanding
0.522021
Feedback Attribution for Counterfactual Bandit Learning in Multi-Domain Spoken Language Understanding · EMNLP (1) 2021
Comparing Stochastic Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding in Multiple Languages · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › task-oriented dialogue
multi-domain dialogue
0.512021
Feedback Attribution for Counterfactual Bandit Learning in Multi-Domain Spoken Language Understanding · EMNLP (1) 2021
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
counterfactual learning from bandit feedback
0.112021
Feedback Attribution for Counterfactual Bandit Learning in Multi-Domain Spoken Language Understanding · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
semantic annotation
0.112011
Comparing Stochastic Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding in Multiple Languages · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Audio and music processing › speech recognition
acoustic modeling
0.112011
Equivalence of Generative and Log-Linear Models · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011
Audio and music processing
speech recognition
0.112011
Equivalence of Generative and Log-Linear Models · IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-agent reinforcement learning · 0.5feedback attribution · 0.5counterfactual bandit learning · 0.5support vector machine · 0.1statistical machine translation · 0.1maximum entropy markov models · 0.1log-linear model · 0.1hidden markov model · 0.1gaussian mixture model · 0.1finite state transducer · 0.1dynamic bayesian network · 0.1conditional random field · 0.1ROVER · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Feedback Attribution for Counterfactual Bandit Learning in Multi-Domain Spoken Language Understanding
abstract
With counterfactual bandit learning, models can be trained based on positive and negative feedback received for historical predictions, with no labeled data needed.Such feedback is often available in real-world dialog systems, however, the modularized architecture commonly used in large-scale systems prevents the direct application of such algorithms.In this paper, we study the feedback attribution problem that arises when using counterfactual bandit learning for multi-domain spoken language understanding.We introduce an experimental setup to simulate the problem on small-scale public datasets, propose attribution methods inspired by multi-agent reinforcement learning and evaluate them against multiple baselines.We find that while directly using overall feedback leads to disastrous performance, our proposed attribution methods can allow training competitive models from user feedback.
Tobias Falke, Patrick Lehnen
EMNLP (1)2
2021 Predicting Temporal Performance Drop of Deployed Production Spoken Language Understanding Models
Quynh Do, Judith Gaspers, Daniil Sorokin, Patrick Lehnen
Interspeech4
2021 The Impact of Intent Distribution Mismatch on Semi-Supervised Spoken Language Understanding
Judith Gaspers, Quynh Do, Daniil Sorokin, Patrick Lehnen
Interspeech4
2015 A Comparison of Update Strategies for Large-Scale Maximum Expected BLEU Training
abstract
Joern Wuebker, Sebastian Muehr, Patrick Lehnen, Stephan Peitz, Hermann Ney. Proceedings of the 2015 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2015.
Jörn Wübker, Sebastian Muehr, Patrick Lehnen, Stephan Peitz, Hermann Ney
HLT-NAACL3
2013 Improving LVCSR with hidden conditional random fields for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion
abstract
In virtually every state-of-the-art large vocabulary continuous speech recognition (LVCSR) system, grapheme-to-phoneme (G2P) conversion is applied to generalize beyond a fixed set of words given by a background lexicon. The overall performance of the G2P system has a strong effect on the recognition qual-ity. Typically, generative models based on joint-n-grams are used, although some discriminative models have a competitive performance but the training time may be quite large. In this work, the effect of using discriminative G2P modeling based on hidden conditional random fields (HCRFs) is ana-lyzed. Besides measuring and comparing the G2P qualities on a textual level, one focus is the performance of LVCSR systems. Although the HCRF model does not outperform the generative one on text data, we could improve our English QUAERO ASR system by 1-3 % relative on a couple of test corpora over a strong baseline by only replacing the G2P strategy. Index Terms: grapheme-to-phoneme conversion, G2P, LVCSR, HCRF, hidden conditional random fields
Stefan Hahn, Patrick Lehnen, Simon Wiesler, Ralf Schlüter, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH2
2013 Structure learning in hidden conditional random fields for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion
abstract
Accurate grapheme-to-phoneme (g2p) conversion is needed for several speech processing applications, such as automatic speech synthesis and recognition.For some languages, notably English, improvements of g2p systems are very slow, due to the intricacy of the associations between letter and sounds.In recent years, several improvements have been obtained either by using variable-length associations in generative models (jointn-grams), or by recasting the problem as a conventional sequence labeling task, enabling to integrate rich dependencies in discriminative models.In this paper, we consider several ways to reconciliate these two approaches.Introducing hidden variable-length alignments through latent variables, our Hidden Conditional Random Field (HCRF) models are able to produce comparative performance compared to strong generative and discriminative models on the CELEX database.
Patrick Lehnen, Alexandre Allauzen, Thomas Lavergne, François Yvon, Stefan Hahn, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH1
2013 (Hidden) Conditional Random Fields Using Intermediate Classes for Statistical Machine Translation
Patrick Lehnen, Jan-Thorsten Peter, Jörn Wübker, Stephan Peitz, Hermann Ney
MTSummit1
2012 Hidden Conditional Random Fields with M-to-N Alignments for Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion
abstract
Conditional Random Fields have been successfully applied to a number of NLP tasks like concept tagging, named entity tagging, or grapheme-to-phoneme conversion.When no alignment between source and target side is provided with the training data, it is challenging to build a CRF system with state-of-the-art performance.In this work, we present an approach incorporating an Mto-N alignment as a hidden variable within a transducerbased implementation of CRFs.Including integrated estimation of transition penalties, it was possible to train a state-of-the-art hidden CRF system in reasonable time for an English grapheme-to-phoneme conversion task without using an external model to provide the alignment.
Patrick Lehnen, Stefan Hahn, Vlad-Andrei Guta, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH1
2011 Powerful extensions to CRFS for grapheme to phoneme conversion
abstract
Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) have proven to per form well on natural language processing tasks like name transliteration, concept tagging or grapheme-to-phoneme (g2p) conversion. The aim of this paper is to propose some extension to the state-of-the-art CRF systems for these tasks. Since the number of features can grow rapidly, a method for features selection is very helpful to boost performance. A combination of L1 and L2 regularization (elastic net) has been adopted and implemented within the Rprop optimization algorithm. Usually, dependencies on the target side are limited to bigram dependencies since the computational complexity grows exponentially with the history length. We present a modified CRF decoding where a conventional language model on target side is integrated into the CRF search process. Thus, larger contexts can be taken into account. Besides these two main parts, the already published margin-extension to the CRF training criterion has been adopted.
Stefan Hahn, Patrick Lehnen, Hermann Ney
ICASSP2
2011 EM-style optimization of hidden conditional random fields for grapheme-to-phoneme conversion
abstract
We have recently proposed an EM-style algorithm to optimize log-linear models with hidden variables. In this paper, we use this algorithm to optimize a hidden conditional random field, i.e., a conditional random field with hidden variables. Similar to hidden Markov models, the alignments are the hidden variables in the examples considered. Here, EM-style algorithms are iterative optimization algorithms which are guaranteed to improve the training criterion in each iteration without the need for tuning step sizes, sophisticated update schemes or numerical line optimization (with hardly predictable complexity). This is a rather strong property which conventional gradient-based optimization algorithms do not have. We present experimental results for a grapheme-to-phoneme conversion task and compare the convergence behavior of the EM-style algorithm with L-BFGS and Rprop.
Georg Heigold, Stefan Hahn, Patrick Lehnen, Hermann Ney
ICASSP3
2011 Incorporating alignments into Conditional Random Fields for grapheme to phoneme conversion
abstract
Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) are a state-of-the-art approach to natural language processing tasks like grapheme-to phoneme (g2p) conversion which is used to produce pronunciations or pronunciation variants for almost all ASR pronunciation lexica. One drawback of CRFs is that for training, an alignment is needed between graphemes and phonemes, usually even 1-to-l. The quality of the g2p result heavily depends on this alignment. Since these alignments are usually not annotated within the corpora, external models have to be used to produce such an alignment in a preprocessing step. In this work, we propose two approaches to integrate the alignment generation directly and efficiently into the CRF training process. Whereas the first approach relies on linear segmentation as starting point, the second approach considers all possible alignments given certain constraints. Both methods have been evaluated on two English g2p tasks, namely NETtalk and Celex, on which state-of-the-art results have been reported in the literature. The proposed approaches lead to results comparable to the state-of-the art.
Patrick Lehnen, Stefan Hahn, Andreas Guta, Hermann Ney
ICASSP1
2011 N-Grams for Conditional Random Fields or a Failure-Transition(f) Posterior for Acyclic FSTs
Patrick Lehnen, Stefan Hahn, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH1
2011 Comparing Stochastic Approaches to Spoken Language Understanding in Multiple Languages
abstract
One of the first steps in building a spoken language understanding (SLU) module for dialogue systems is the extraction of flat concepts out of a given word sequence, usually provided by an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system. In this paper, six different modeling approaches are investigated to tackle the task of concept tagging. These methods include classical, well-known generative and discriminative methods like Finite State Transducers (FSTs), Statistical Machine Translation (SMT), Maximum Entropy Markov Models (MEMMs), or Support Vector Machines (SVMs) as well as techniques recently applied to natural language processing such as Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) or Dynamic Bayesian Networks (DBNs). Following a detailed description of the models, experimental and comparative results are presented on three corpora in different languages and with different complexity. The French MEDIA corpus has already been exploited during an evaluation campaign and so a direct comparison with existing benchmarks is possible. Recently collected Italian and Polish corpora are used to test the robustness and portability of the modeling approaches. For all tasks, manual transcriptions as well as ASR inputs are considered. Additionally to single systems, methods for system combination are investigated. The best performing model on all tasks is based on conditional random fields. On the MEDIA evaluation corpus, a concept error rate of 12.6% could be achieved. Here, additionally to attribute names, attribute values have been extracted using a combination of a rule-based and a statistical approach. Applying system combination using weighted ROVER with all six systems, the concept error rate (CER) drops to 12.0%.
Stefan Hahn, Marco Dinarelli, Christian Raymond, Fabrice Lefèvre, Patrick Lehnen, Renato De Mori, Alessandro Moschitti, Hermann Ney, Giuseppe Riccardi
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.5
2011 Equivalence of Generative and Log-Linear Models
abstract
Conventional speech recognition systems are based on hidden Markov models (HMMs) with Gaussian mixture models (GHMMs). Discriminative log-linear models are an alternative modeling approach and have been investigated recently in speech recognition. GHMMs are directed models with constraints, e.g., positivity of variances and normalization of conditional probabilities, while log-linear models do not use such constraints. This paper compares the posterior form of typical generative models related to speech recognition with their log-linear model counterparts. The key result will be the derivation of the equivalence of these two different approaches under weak assumptions. In particular, we study Gaussian mixture models, part-of-speech bigram tagging models, and eventually, the GHMMs. This result unifies two important but fundamentally different modeling paradigms in speech recognition on the functional level. Furthermore, this paper will present comparative experimental results for various speech tasks of different complexity, including a digit string and large-vocabulary continuous speech recognition tasks.
Georg Heigold, Hermann Ney, Patrick Lehnen, Tobias Gass, Ralf Schlüter
IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Process.3
2010 Discriminative HMMS, log-linear models, and CRFS: What is the difference?
abstract
Recently, there have been many papers studying discriminative acoustic modeling techniques like conditional random fields or discriminative training of conventional Gaussian HMMs. This paper will give an overview of the recent work and progress. We will strictly distinguish between the type of acoustic models on the one hand and the training criterion on the other hand. We will address two issues in more detail: the relation between conventional Gaussian HMMs and conditional random fields and the advantages of formulating the training criterion as a convex optimization problem. Experimental results for various speech tasks will be presented to carefully evaluate the different concepts and approaches, including both a digit string and large vocabulary continuous speech recognition tasks.
Georg Heigold, Simon Wiesler, Markus Nußbaum-Thom, Patrick Lehnen, Ralf Schlüter, Hermann Ney
ICASSP4
2009 Optimizing CRFs for SLU tasks in various languages using modified training criteria
abstract
In this paper, we present improvements of our state-of-the-art concept tagger based on conditional random fields.Statistical models have been optimized for three tasks of varying complexity in three languages (French, Italian, and Polish).Modified training criteria have been investigated leading to small improvements.The respective corpora as well as parameter optimization results for all models are presented in detail.A comparison of the selected features between languages as well as a close look at the tuning of the regularization parameter is given.The experimental results show in what level the optimizations of the single systems are portable between languages.
Stefan Hahn, Patrick Lehnen, Georg Heigold, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH2
2009 Large-scale Polish SLU
abstract
In this paper, we present state-of-the art concept tagging results on a new corpus for Polish SLU.For this language, it is the first large-scale corpus (~200 different concepts) which has been semantically annotated and will be made publicly available.Conditional Random Fields have proven to lead to best results for string-to-string translation problems.Using this approach, we achieve a concept error rate of 22.6% on an evaluation corpus.To additionally extract attribute values, a combination of a statistical and a rule-based approach is used leading to a CER of 30.2%.
Patrick Lehnen, Stefan Hahn, Hermann Ney, Agnieszka Mykowiecka 0001
INTERSPEECH1
2008 System combination for spoken language understanding
abstract
One of the first steps in an SLU system usually is the extraction of flat concepts. Within this paper, we present five methods for concept tagging and give experimental results on the state-of-the-art MEDIA corpus for both, manual transcriptions (REF) and ASR input (ASR). Compared to previous publications, some single systems could be improved and the ASR results are presented for the first time. We could improve the tagging performance of the best known result on this task by approx. 7 % relatively from 16.2 % to 15.0 % CER for REF using light-weight system combination (ROVER). For the ASR task, we achieve improvements by approx. 3 % relatively from 29.8 % to 28.9 % CER. An analysis of the differences in performance on both tasks is also given. Index Terms: Spoken dialogue systems, system combination 1.
Stefan Hahn, Patrick Lehnen, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH2
2008 On the equivalence of Gaussian and log-linear HMMs
abstract
The acoustic models of conventional state-of-the-art speech recognition systems use generative Gaussian HMMs. In the past few years, discriminative models like for example Conditional Random Fields (CRFs) have been proposed to refine the acoustic models. CRFs directly model the class posteriors, the quantities of interest in recognition. CRFs are undirected models, and CRFs do not assume local normalization constraints as HMMs do. This paper addresses the issue to what extent such less restricted models add flexiblity to the model compared with the generative counterpart. This work extends our previous work in that it provides the technical details used for showing the equivalence of Gaussian and log-linear HMMs. The correctness of the proposed equivalence transformation for conditional probabilities is demonstrated on a simple concept tagging task.
Georg Heigold, Patrick Lehnen, Ralf Schlüter, Hermann Ney
INTERSPEECH2
2008 A Comparison of Various Methods for Concept Tagging for Spoken Language Understanding
Stefan Hahn, Patrick Lehnen, Christian Raymond, Hermann Ney
LREC2