Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Xingwei He 0003

dblp:18/8988-3 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
7 papers
Language models and text generation · 73% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 13% Multi-agent systems · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 69% Recommender systems · 31%

Topics — the 21 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
1.222023
CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion · EMNLP 2023
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.222023
CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion · EMNLP 2023
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
1.122022
Controllable Dictionary Example Generation: Generating Example Sentences for Specific Targeted Audiences · ACL (1) 2022
Show Me How To Revise: Improving Lexically Constrained Sentence Generation with XLNet · AAAI 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems › multi-agent coordination
conflict detection and resolution
1.012026
ConInstruct: Evaluating Large Language Models on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Instructions · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction following
1.012026
ConInstruct: Evaluating Large Language Models on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Instructions · AAAI 2026
Recommender systems
point-of-interest recommendation
0.912025
A Survey on Point-of-Interest Recommendation: Models, Architectures, and Security · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › hallucination mitigation
factual error correction
0.812024
Improving Factual Error Correction by Learning to Inject Factual Errors · AAAI 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
commonsense reasoning
0.612022
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation
0.612022
Controllable Dictionary Example Generation: Generating Example Sentences for Specific Targeted Audiences · ACL (1) 2022
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › commonsense reasoning
generative commonsense reasoning
0.612022
Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
constrained text generation
0.512021
Parallel Refinements for Lexically Constrained Text Generation with BART · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › controllable text generation
lexically constrained generation
0.512021
Parallel Refinements for Lexically Constrained Text Generation with BART · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › controllable text generation
lexically constrained sentence generation
0.512021
Show Me How To Revise: Improving Lexically Constrained Sentence Generation with XLNet · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
text infilling
0.512021
Show Me How To Revise: Improving Lexically Constrained Sentence Generation with XLNet · AAAI 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.312026
ConInstruct: Evaluating Large Language Models on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Instructions · AAAI 2026
Recommender systems
federated recommendation
0.312025
A Survey on Point-of-Interest Recommendation: Models, Architectures, and Security · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Privacy and data protection › privacy-preserving machine learning
privacy-preserving recommendation
0.312025
A Survey on Point-of-Interest Recommendation: Models, Architectures, and Security · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
hallucination mitigation
0.212024
Improving Factual Error Correction by Learning to Inject Factual Errors · AAAI 2024
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › information retrieval
document expansion
0.212023
CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
parallel decoding
0.112021
Parallel Refinements for Lexically Constrained Text Generation with BART · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.112021
Show Me How To Revise: Improving Lexically Constrained Sentence Generation with XLNet · AAAI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.7pseudo-query generation · 1.3curriculum sampling · 1.3knowledge distillation · 1.1benchmark construction · 1.0mask-corrupt-correct · 0.8data filtering · 0.8corruptor · 0.8corrector · 0.8target-word-aware model · 0.6controllable generation · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 ConInstruct: Evaluating Large Language Models on Conflict Detection and Resolution in Instructions
abstract
Instruction-following is a critical capability of Large Language Models (LLMs). While existing works primarily focus on assessing how well LLMs adhere to user instructions, they often overlook scenarios where instructions contain conflicting constraints—a common occurrence in complex prompts. The behavior of LLMs under such conditions remains under-explored. To bridge this gap, we introduce ConInstruct, a benchmark specifically designed to assess LLMs' ability to detect and resolve conflicts within user instructions. Using this dataset, we evaluate LLMs' conflict detection performance and analyze their conflict resolution behavior. Our experiments reveal two key findings: (1) Most proprietary LLMs exhibit strong conflict detection capabilities, whereas among open-source models, only DeepSeek-R1 demonstrates similarly strong performance. DeepSeek-R1 and Claude-4.5-Sonnet achieve the highest average F1-scores at 91.5% and 87.3%, respectively, ranking first and second overall. (2) Despite their strong conflict detection abilities, LLMs rarely explicitly notify users about the conflicts or request clarification when faced with conflicting constraints. These results underscore a critical shortcoming in current LLMs and highlight an important area for future improvement when designing instruction-following LLMs.
Xingwei He 0003, Qianru Zhang, Guanhua Chen 0001, Linlin Yu, Siu-Ming Yiu
AAAI1
2025 A Survey on Point-of-Interest Recommendation: Models, Architectures, and Security
abstract
The widespread adoption of smartphones and Location-Based Social Networks has led to a massive influx of spatio-temporal data, creating unparalleled opportunities for enhancing Point-of-Interest (POI) recommendation systems. These advanced POI systems are crucial for enriching user experiences, enabling personalized interactions, and optimizing decision-making processes in the digital landscape. However, existing surveys tend to focus on traditional approaches and few of them delve into cutting-edge developments, emerging architectures, as well as security considerations in POI recommendations. To address this gap, our survey stands out by offering a comprehensive, up-to-date review of POI recommendation systems, covering advancements in models, architectures, and security aspects. We systematically examine the transition from traditional models to advanced techniques such as large language models. Additionally, we explore the architectural evolution from centralized to decentralized and federated learning systems, highlighting the improvements in scalability and privacy. Furthermore, we address the increasing importance of security, examining potential vulnerabilities and privacy-preserving approaches. Our taxonomy provides a structured overview of the current state of POI recommendation, while we also identify promising directions for future research in this rapidly advancing field.
Qianru Zhang, Peng Yang 0016, Junliang Yu, Haixin Wang 0003, Xingwei He 0003, Siu-Ming Yiu, Hongzhi Yin
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.5
2024 Improving Factual Error Correction by Learning to Inject Factual Errors
abstract
Factual error correction (FEC) aims to revise factual errors in false claims with minimal editing, making them faithful to the provided evidence. This task is crucial for alleviating the hallucination problem encountered by large language models. Given the lack of paired data (i.e., false claims and their corresponding correct claims), existing methods typically adopt the ‘mask-then-correct’ paradigm. This paradigm relies solely on unpaired false claims and correct claims, thus being referred to as distantly supervised methods. These methods require a masker to explicitly identify factual errors within false claims before revising with a corrector. However, the absence of paired data to train the masker makes accurately pinpointing factual errors within claims challenging. To mitigate this, we propose to improve FEC by Learning to Inject Factual Errors (LIFE), a three-step distantly supervised method: ‘mask-corrupt-correct’. Specifically, we first train a corruptor using the ‘mask-then-corrupt’ procedure, allowing it to deliberately introduce factual errors into correct text. The corruptor is then applied to correct claims, generating a substantial amount of paired data. After that, we filter out low-quality data, and use the remaining data to train a corrector. Notably, our corrector does not require a masker, thus circumventing the bottleneck associated with explicit factual error identification. Our experiments on a public dataset verify the effectiveness of LIFE in two key aspects: Firstly, it outperforms the previous best-performing distantly supervised method by a notable margin of 10.59 points in SARI Final (19.3% improvement). Secondly, even compared to ChatGPT prompted with in-context examples, LIFE achieves a superiority of 7.16 points in SARI Final.
Xingwei He 0003, Qianru Zhang, A-Long Jin, Siu-Ming Yiu
AAAI1
2024 Knowledge Enhanced Pre-training for Cross-lingual Dense Retrieval
abstract
In recent years, multilingual pre-trained language models (mPLMs) have achieved significant progress in cross-lingual dense retrieval. However, most mPLMs neglect the importance of knowledge. Knowledge always conveys similar semantic concepts in a language-agnostic manner, while query-passage pairs in cross-lingual retrieval also share common factual information. Motivated by this observation, we introduce KEPT, a novel mPLM that effectively leverages knowledge to learn language-agnostic semantic representations. To achieve this, we construct a multilingual knowledge base using hyperlinks and cross-language page alignment data annotated by Wiki. From this knowledge base, we mine intra- and cross-language pairs by extracting symmetrically linked segments and multilingual entity descriptions. Subsequently, we adopt contrastive learning with the mined pairs to pre-train KEPT. We evaluate KEPT on three widely-used benchmarks, considering both zero-shot cross-lingual transfer and supervised multilingual fine-tuning scenarios. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that KEPT achieves strong multilingual and cross-lingual retrieval performance with significant improvements over existing mPLMs.
Hang Zhang 0029, Yeyun Gong, Dayiheng Liu, Shunyu Zhang, Xingwei He 0003, Jiancheng Lv 0001, Jian Guo 0016
LREC/COLING5
2023 CAPSTONE: Curriculum Sampling for Dense Retrieval with Document Expansion
abstract
The dual-encoder has become the de facto architecture for dense retrieval.Typically, it computes the latent representations of the query and document independently, thus failing to fully capture the interactions between the query and document.To alleviate this, recent research has focused on obtaining query-informed document representations.During training, it expands the document with a real query, but during inference, it replaces the real query with a generated one.This inconsistency between training and inference causes the dense retrieval model to prioritize query information while disregarding the document when computing the document representation.Consequently, it performs even worse than the vanilla dense retrieval model because its performance heavily relies on the relevance between the generated queries and the real query.In this paper, we propose a curriculum sampling strategy that utilizes pseudo queries during training and progressively enhances the relevance between the generated query and the real query.By doing so, the retrieval model learns to extend its attention from the document alone to both the document and query, resulting in high-quality queryinformed document representations.Experimental results on both in-domain and out-ofdomain datasets demonstrate that our approach outperforms previous dense retrieval models.
Xingwei He 0003, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Hang Zhang 0029, Anlei Dong, Jian Jiao 0007, Siu-Ming Yiu, Nan Duan 0001
EMNLP1
2022 Controllable Dictionary Example Generation: Generating Example Sentences for Specific Targeted Audiences
abstract
Example sentences for targeted words in a dictionary play an important role to help readers understand the usage of words.Traditionally, example sentences in a dictionary are usually created by linguistics experts, which are labor-intensive and knowledge-intensive.In this paper, we introduce the problem of dictionary example sentence generation, aiming to automatically generate dictionary example sentences for targeted words according to the corresponding definitions.This task is challenging especially for polysemous words, because the generated sentences need to reflect different usages and meanings of these targeted words.Targeted readers may also have different backgrounds and educational levels.It is essential to generate example sentences that can be understandable for different backgrounds and levels of audiences.To solve these problems, we propose a controllable target-word-aware model for this task.Our proposed model can generate reasonable examples for targeted words, even for polysemous words.In addition, our model allows users to provide explicit control over attributes related to readability, such as length and lexical complexity, thus generating suitable examples for targeted audiences.Automatic and human evaluations on the Oxford dictionary dataset show that our model can generate suitable examples for targeted words with specific definitions while meeting the desired readability.
Xingwei He 0003, Siu-Ming Yiu
ACL (1)1
2022 Metric-guided Distillation: Distilling Knowledge from the Metric to Ranker and Retriever for Generative Commonsense Reasoning
abstract
Xingwei He, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Weizhen Qi, Hang Zhang, Jian Jiao, Bartuer Zhou, Biao Cheng, Sm Yiu, Nan Duan. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
Xingwei He 0003, Yeyun Gong, A-Long Jin, Weizhen Qi, Hang Zhang 0029, Jian Jiao 0007, Bartuer Zhou, Biao Cheng, Siu-Ming Yiu, Nan Duan 0001
EMNLP1
2021 Show Me How To Revise: Improving Lexically Constrained Sentence Generation with XLNet
abstract
Lexically constrained sentence generation allows the incorporation of prior knowledge such as lexical constraints into the output. This technique has been applied to machine translation, and dialog response generation. Previous work usually used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling to generate lexically constrained sentences, but they randomly determined the position to be edited and the action to be taken, resulting in many invalid refinements. To overcome this challenge, we used a classifier to instruct the MCMC-based models where and how to refine the candidate sentences. First, we developed two methods to create synthetic data on which the pre-trained model is fine-tuned to obtain a reliable classifier. Next, we proposed a two-step approach, “Predict and Revise”, for constrained sentence generation. During the predict step, we leveraged the classifier to compute the learned prior for the candidate sentence. During the revise step, we resorted to MCMC sampling to revise the candidate sentence by conducting a sampled action at a sampled position drawn from the learned prior. We compared our proposed models with many strong baselines on two tasks, generating sentences with lexical constraints and text infilling. Experimental results have demonstrated that our proposed model performs much better than the previous work in terms of sentence fluency and diversity. Our code, pre-trained models and Appendix are available at https://github.com/NLPCode/MCMCXLNet.
Xingwei He 0003, Victor O. K. Li
AAAI1
2021 Parallel Refinements for Lexically Constrained Text Generation with BART
abstract
Lexically constrained text generation aims to control the generated text by incorporating some pre-specified keywords into the output.Previous work injects lexical constraints into the output by controlling the decoding process or refining the candidate output iteratively, which tends to generate generic or ungrammatical sentences, and has high computational complexity.To address these challenges, we propose Constrained BART (CBART) for lexically constrained text generation.CBART leverages the pre-trained model BART and transfers part of the generation burden from the decoder to the encoder by decomposing this task into two sub-tasks, thereby improving the sentence quality.Concretely, we extend BART by adding a token-level classifier over the encoder, aiming at instructing the decoder where to replace and insert.Guided by the encoder, the decoder refines multiple tokens of the input in one step by inserting tokens before specific positions and re-predicting tokens with low confidence.To further reduce the inference latency, the decoder predicts all tokens in parallel.Experiment results on One-Billion-Word and Yelp show that CBART can generate plausible text with high quality and diversity while significantly accelerating inference.
Xingwei He 0003
EMNLP (1)1