VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Makoto Takamoto
dblp:18/9869
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
5 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 38% Graph learning · 26% Information extraction and text analysis · 20% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering › model simulation › atomistic simulation
machine learning interatomic potential |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Physics-Informed Weakly Supervised Learning For Interatomic Potentials · ICML 2025 Higher-Rank Irreducible Cartesian Tensors for Equivariant Message Passing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Parameter-Guided Channel Attention · ICML 2023 PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equation solver
neural PDE solver |
0.9 | 2 | 2025 | Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Parameter-Guided Channel Attention · ICML 2023 Active Learning for Neural PDE Solvers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Active Learning for Neural PDE Solvers · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scientific machine learning
neural PDE solvers |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Active Learning for Neural PDE Solvers · ICLR 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › computational chemistry › molecular simulation
molecular dynamics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Physics-Informed Weakly Supervised Learning For Interatomic Potentials · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
physics-informed machine learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Physics-Informed Weakly Supervised Learning For Interatomic Potentials · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › geometric graph neural network
equivariant message passing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Higher-Rank Irreducible Cartesian Tensors for Equivariant Message Passing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
message passing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Higher-Rank Irreducible Cartesian Tensors for Equivariant Message Passing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computational science and engineering › model simulation
atomistic simulation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Higher-Rank Irreducible Cartesian Tensors for Equivariant Message Passing · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
attention mechanism |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Parameter-Guided Channel Attention · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism › attention module
channel attention |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Parameter-Guided Channel Attention · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › open information extraction
multilingual open information extraction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MILIE: Modular & Iterative Multilingual Open Information Extraction · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
open information extraction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | MILIE: Modular & Iterative Multilingual Open Information Extraction · ACL (1) 2022 |
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
PDE learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine Learning · NeurIPS 2022 |
Computational science and engineering
partial differential equations |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Active Learning for Neural PDE Solvers · ICLR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty-based sampling · 1.7feature-based sampling · 1.7active learning · 1.7irreducible representations · 1.5parameter embeddings · 1.3curriculum learning · 1.3weak supervision · 0.9taylor expansion · 0.9conservative force constraints · 0.9cartesian tensors · 0.8cartesian tensor · 0.8modular extraction · 0.6iterative extraction · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Active Learning for Neural PDE SolversabstractSolving partial differential equations (PDEs) is a fundamental problem in engineering and science. While neural PDE solvers can be more efficient than established numerical solvers, they often require large amounts of training data that is costly to obtain. Active learning (AL) could help surrogate models reach the same accuracy with smaller training sets by querying classical solvers with more informative initial conditions and PDE parameters. While AL is more common in other domains, it has yet to be studied extensively for neural PDE solvers. To bridge this gap, we introduce AL4PDE, a modular and extensible active learning benchmark. It provides multiple parametric PDEs and state-of-the-art surrogate models for the solver-in-the-loop setting, enabling the evaluation of existing and the development of new AL methods for PDE solving. We use the benchmark to evaluate batch active learning algorithms such as uncertainty- and feature-based methods. We show that AL reduces the average error by up to 71\% compared to random sampling and significantly reduces worst-case errors. Moreover, AL generates similar datasets across repeated runs, with consistent distributions over the PDE parameters and initial conditions. The acquired datasets are reusable, providing benefits for surrogate models not involved in the data generation. Daniel Musekamp, Marimuthu Kalimuthu, David Holzmüller, Makoto Takamoto, Mathias Niepert |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Physics-Informed Weakly Supervised Learning For Interatomic PotentialsabstractMachine learning is playing an increasingly important role in computational chemistry and materials science, complementing expensive ab initio and first-principles methods. However, machine-learned interatomic potentials (MLIPs) often struggle with generalization and robustness, leading to unphysical energy and force predictions in atomistic simulations. To address this, we propose a physics-informed, weakly supervised training framework for MLIPs. Our method introduces two novel loss functions: one based on Taylor expansions of the potential energy and another enforcing conservative force constraints. This approach enhances accuracy, particularly in low-data regimes, and reduces the reliance on large, expensive training datasets. Extensive experiments across benchmark datasets show up to 2$\times$ reductions in energy and force errors for multiple baseline models. Additionally, our method improves the stability of molecular dynamics simulations and facilitates effective fine-tuning of ML foundation models on sparse, high-accuracy ab initio data. An implementation of our method and scripts for executing experiments are available at https://github.com/nec-research/PICPS-ML4Sci. Makoto Takamoto, Viktor Zaverkin, Mathias Niepert |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Higher-Rank Irreducible Cartesian Tensors for Equivariant Message PassingabstractThe ability to perform fast and accurate atomistic simulations is crucial for advancing the chemical sciences. By learning from high-quality data, machine-learned interatomic potentials achieve accuracy on par with ab initio and first-principles methods at a fraction of their computational cost. The success of machine-learned interatomic potentials arises from integrating inductive biases such as equivariance to group actions on an atomic system, e.g., equivariance to rotations and reflections. In particular, the field has notably advanced with the emergence of equivariant message passing. Most of these models represent an atomic system using spherical tensors, tensor products of which require complicated numerical coefficients and can be computationally demanding. Cartesian tensors offer a promising alternative, though state-of-the-art methods lack flexibility in message-passing mechanisms, restricting their architectures and expressive power. This work explores higher-rank irreducible Cartesian tensors to address these limitations. We integrate irreducible Cartesian tensor products into message-passing neural networks and prove the equivariance and traceless property of the resulting layers. Through empirical evaluations on various benchmark data sets, we consistently observe on-par or better performance than that of state-of-the-art spherical and Cartesian models. Viktor Zaverkin, Francesco Alesiani, Takashi Maruyama, Federico Errica, Henrik Christiansen, Makoto Takamoto, Nicolas Weber, Mathias Niepert |
NeurIPS | 6 |
| 2023 | Learning Neural PDE Solvers with Parameter-Guided Channel AttentionabstractScientific Machine Learning (SciML) is concerned with the development of learned emulators of physical systems governed by partial differential equations (PDE). In application domains such as weather forecasting, molecular dynamics, and inverse design, ML-based surrogate models are increasingly used to augment or replace inefficient and often non-differentiable numerical simulation algorithms. While a number of ML-based methods for approximating the solutions of PDEs have been proposed in recent years, they typically do not adapt to the parameters of the PDEs, making it difficult to generalize to PDE parameters not seen during training. We propose a Channel Attention guided by PDE Parameter Embeddings (CAPE) component for neural surrogate models and a simple yet effective curriculum learning strategy. The CAPE module can be combined with any neural PDE solvers allowing them to adapt to unseen PDE parameters. The curriculum learning strategy provides a seamless transition between teacher-forcing and fully auto-regressive training. We compare CAPE in conjunction with the curriculum learning strategy using a PDE benchmark and obtain consistent and significant improvements over the baseline models. The experiments also show several advantages of CAPE, such as its increased ability to generalize to unseen PDE parameters without large increases inference time and parameter count. An implementation of the method and experiments are available at https://anonymous.4open.science/r/CAPE-ML4Sci-145B. Makoto Takamoto, Francesco Alesiani, Mathias Niepert |
ICML | 1 |
| 2022 | MILIE: Modular & Iterative Multilingual Open Information ExtractionabstractBhushan Kotnis, Kiril Gashteovski, Daniel Rubio, Ammar Shaker, Vanesa Rodriguez-Tembras, Makoto Takamoto, Mathias Niepert, Carolin Lawrence. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Bhushan Kotnis, Kiril Gashteovski, Daniel Oñoro-Rubio, Ammar Shaker, Vanesa Rodriguez-Tembras, Makoto Takamoto, Mathias Niepert, Carolin Lawrence |
ACL (1) | 6 |
| 2022 | PDEBench: An Extensive Benchmark for Scientific Machine LearningabstractMachine learning-based modeling of physical systems has experienced increased interest in recent years. Despite some impressive progress, there is still a lack of benchmarks for Scientific ML that are easy to use but still challenging and repre- sentative of a wide range of problems. We introduce PDEBENCH, a benchmark suite of time-dependent simulation tasks based on Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). PDEBENCH comprises both code and data to benchmark the performance of novel machine learning models against both classical numerical simulations and machine learning baselines. Our proposed set of benchmark problems con- tribute the following unique features: (1) A much wider range of PDEs compared to existing benchmarks, ranging from relatively common examples to more real- istic and difficult problems; (2) much larger ready-to-use datasets compared to prior work, comprising multiple simulation runs across a larger number of ini- tial and boundary conditions and PDE parameters; (3) more extensible source codes with user-friendly APIs for data generation and baseline results with popular machine learning models (FNO, U-Net, PINN, Gradient-Based Inverse Method). PDEBENCH allows researchers to extend the benchmark freely for their own pur- poses using a standardized API and to compare the performance of new models to existing baseline methods. We also propose new evaluation metrics with the aim to provide a more holistic understanding of learning methods in the context of Scientific ML. With those metrics we identify tasks which are challenging for recent ML methods and propose these tasks as future challenges for the community. The code is available at https://github.com/pdebench/PDEBench. Makoto Takamoto, Timothy Praditia, Raphael Leiteritz, Daniel MacKinlay, Francesco Alesiani, Dirk Pflüger, Mathias Niepert |
NeurIPS | 1 |