Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Nitin Varyani

dblp:180/2537 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-4549-561XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Cellular and mobile networks · 51% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 26% Transport protocols and congestion control · 15%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cellular and mobile networks
5g
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › intelligent transportation systems
remote driving
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Cellular and mobile networks › low-latency communication
ultra-reliable low-latency communication
1.012026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Edge and fog computing
edge cloud
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
real-time streaming
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026
Transport protocols and congestion control › real-time communication
WebRTC
0.312026
Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet? · IEEE Trans. Netw. 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qoe analysis · 1.0end-to-end measurement · 1.0cross-layer measurement · 1.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Teleoperating Autonomous Vehicles Over Commercial 5G Networks: Are We There Yet?
abstract
Remote driving, orteleoperating AutonomousVehicles (AVs), is a key application that emerging 5G networks aim to support. In this paper, we conduct a systematic feasibility study of AV teleoperation over commercial 5G networks from bothcross-layerandend-to-end (E2E)perspectives. Given the critical importance oftimely delivery of sensor data, such as camera and LiDAR data, for AV teleoperation, we focus in particular on the performance of uplink sensor data delivery. We analyze the impact of Physical Layer (PHY layer) 5G radio network factors, including channel conditions, radio resource allocation, and Handovers (HOs), on E2E latency performance. We also examine the impact of 5G networks on the performance of upper-layer protocols and E2E application Quality-of-Experience (QoE) of the adaptation mechanisms used for real-time sensor data delivery, such as Real-Time Streaming Protocol (RTSP) and Web Real Time Communication (WebRTC). Our study reveals the challenges posed by today’s 5G networks and the limitations of existing sensor data streaming mechanisms. The insights gained will help inform the co-design of future-generation wireless networks, edge cloud systems, and applications to overcome the low-latency barriers in AV teleoperation.
Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Jason Carpenter, Rushikesh Zende, Sree Ganesh Lalitaditya Divakarla, Nitin Varyani, Faaiq Bilal, Steven Sleder, Nanditha Naik, Duncan Joly, Eman Ramadan, Ajay Kumar Gurumadaiah, Zhi-Li Zhang
IEEE Trans. Netw.5
2021 VeerEdge: Towards an Edge-Centric IoT Gateway
abstract
As the plethora of Internet of Things (IoT) devices gradually make their way into our lives, several Cloud Service Providers (CSPs) have developed IoT gateway platforms (SDKs) that solely connects IoT devices to their respective cloud. Such gateways have 1) cumbersome IoT device configuration; 2) inflexible IoT data managements; and 3) support no/little cross-vendor edge computation and cloud analytics. We term these commercial gateway SDKs as cloud-centric. In this paper, we study the state-of-the-art vendor-locked IoT Gateway solutions and approaches and propose an edge-centric paradigm through an evolutionary framework, dubbed VeerEdge for developing IoT gateways. We leverage computing and storage capabilities at the network edge for edge-based device & IoT service management and data processing. We exploit availability of multiple cloud services for "best" IoT data analytics. Evaluation results show that VeerEdge achieves this with negligible overhead in terms of latency, CPU and RAM usage when compared to state-of-the-art industrial IoT gateways.
Udhaya Kumar Dayalan, Rostand A. K. Fezeu, Nitin Varyani, Timothy J. Salo, Zhi-Li Zhang
CCGRID3
2019 LADEQ: A Fast Lagrangian Relaxation Based Algorithm for Destination-Based QoS Routing
Nitin Varyani, Zhi-Li Zhang, Muralidharan Rangachari, David H. Dai
IM1