Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Florin Burcea

dblp:180/3639 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5601-1193ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 6 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers
Integrated circuit design · 79% Electronic design automation · 21%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Integrated circuit design
analog and mixed-signal circuits
0.932020
PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
A New Chessboard Placement and Sizing Method for Capacitors in a Charge-Scaling DAC by Worst-Case Analysis of Nonlinearity · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016
Procedural capacitor placement in differential charge-scaling converters by nonlinearity analysis · DAC 2016
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits
data converters
0.932020
PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
A New Chessboard Placement and Sizing Method for Capacitors in a Charge-Scaling DAC by Worst-Case Analysis of Nonlinearity · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016
Procedural capacitor placement in differential charge-scaling converters by nonlinearity analysis · DAC 2016
Electronic design automation
physical design
0.522020
PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
A New Chessboard Placement and Sizing Method for Capacitors in a Charge-Scaling DAC by Worst-Case Analysis of Nonlinearity · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits › data converters
charge-scaling DAC
0.522016
A New Chessboard Placement and Sizing Method for Capacitors in a Charge-Scaling DAC by Worst-Case Analysis of Nonlinearity · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2016
Procedural capacitor placement in differential charge-scaling converters by nonlinearity analysis · DAC 2016
Integrated circuit design
analog layout
0.412020
PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Electronic design automation › physical design
placement and routing
0.412020
PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits › data converters › analog-to-digital converter
SAR ADC
0.412020
PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs · IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst. 2020
Integrated circuit design › analog and mixed-signal circuits › analog VLSI
capacitor matching
0.212016
Procedural capacitor placement in differential charge-scaling converters by nonlinearity analysis · DAC 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

matching-based routing · 0.4integer linear programming · 0.4worst-case nonlinearity analysis · 0.2statistical variation modeling · 0.2spatial correlation analysis · 0.2nonlinearity analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Structured Design and Evaluation of a Resistor-Based PUF Robust Against PVT-Variations
abstract
This paper proposes a new fully CMOS-compatible PUF primitive robust against process variations, supply voltage variations and temperature drift (PVT) based on resistive structures that implements advanced compensation mechanisms already on circuit level. Based on analog simulation data, the PUF is evaluated regarding its unpredictability and its reliability. The results indicate a high quality. Further, a structured approach for designing a suitable error correction is presented to illustrate the whole PUF system.
Carl Riehm, Christoph Frisch, Florin Burcea, Matthias Hiller, Michael Pehl, Ralf Brederlow
DDECS3
2021 An Efficient Programming Framework for Memristor-based Neuromorphic Computing
abstract
Memristor-based crossbars are considered to be promising candidates to accelerate vector-matrix computation in deep neural networks. Before being applied for inference, mem-ristors in the crossbars should be programmed to conductances corresponding to the network weights after software training. Existing programming methods, however, adjust conductances of memristors individually with many programming-reading cycles. In this paper, we propose an efficient programming framework for memristor crossbars, where the programming process is partitioned into the predictive phase and the fine-tuning phase. In the predictive phase, multiple memristors are programmed simultaneously with a memristor programming model and IR-drop estimation. To deal with the programming inaccuracy resulting from process variations, noise and IR-drop and move conductances to target values, memristors are fine-tuned afterwards to reach a specified programming accuracy. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method can reduce the number of programming-reading cycles by up to 94.77% and 90.61% compared to existing one-by-one and row-by-row programming methods, respectively.
Grace Li Zhang, Bing Li 0005, Xing Huang 0001, Shuhang Zhang, Florin Burcea, Helmut E. Graeb, Tsung-Yi Ho, Hai Li 0001, Ulf Schlichtmann
DATE6
2020 PASTEL: Parasitic Matching-Driven Placement and Routing of Capacitor Arrays With Generalized Ratios in Charge-Redistribution SAR-ADCs
abstract
The charge-redistribution data converter topology is constructed from an array of parallel-connected capacitors with a specific capacitor ratio, and is a fundamental component of successive approximation register (SAR)-analog-to-digital converter (ADC) architectures. This paper presents complementary placement and routing algorithms for such capacitor arrays with the goal of nonlinearity minimization in the target SAR-ADC architecture. Starting from a state-of-the-art static nonlinearity model and its accompanying placement method, generalizations are made for both binary- and nonbinary-weighted capacitor ratios. Taking the generalized nonlinearity model and capacitor routing complexity into consideration, an improved placement method was developed, augmented with a matching-based routing technique driven by routing length adjustment. Analytical results compare the new methodology to the state-of-the-art, achieving superior resolution, linearity, and area.
Ye Xing Ding, Florin Burcea, Husni M. Habal, Helmut E. Graeb
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.2
2019 MEMS-IC Robustness Optimization Considering Electrical and Mechanical Design and Process Parameters
abstract
MEMS-based sensor circuits are traditionally designed separately using CAD tools specific to each energy domain (electrical and mechanical). This article presents a complete approach for combined MEMS-IC robustness optimization. Advanced methods for robustness analysis and optimization considering design, operating and process parameters, developed for integrated circuits, are transferred to MEMS-IC systems. Both electrical and mechanical design and process parameters are included in the optimization. The methodology is exemplified on two demonstrator examples: a MEMS microphone and a MEMS accelerometer, each with an integrated readout circuit. A successful optimization requires the simultaneous inclusion of design parameters and process tolerances from both energy domains. To save CPU time, a reduced-order, circuit-level model is used for the MEMS part and this model is created only when necessary. To integrate the generation of the simplified model into the optimization flow, a simulation-in-a-loop flow based on commercial tools for both the electrical and the mechanical domain has been implemented.
Florin Burcea, Andreas Herrmann, Bing Li 0005, Helmut E. Graeb
ACM Trans. Design Autom. Electr. Syst.1
2016 Procedural capacitor placement in differential charge-scaling converters by nonlinearity analysis
abstract
This paper presents a new approach to capacitor placement in differential charge-scaling data converters. Good capacitor matching is crucial for charge-scaling converter resolution. Differential circuits are preferred to single-ended architectures due to improved immunity to noise and variations. The proposed method is based on the analysis of converter static nonlinearity equations. The impact of capacitor variations on converter linearity is minimized by exploiting spatial correlation between devices. Mathematical analysis is completed for two differential analog-to-digital converters. A procedure to obtain a capacitor placement is presented for each circuit. The architectures are compared with respect to linearity and capacitor placement area.
Florin Burcea, Husni M. Habal, Helmut E. Graeb
DAC1
2016 A New Chessboard Placement and Sizing Method for Capacitors in a Charge-Scaling DAC by Worst-Case Analysis of Nonlinearity
abstract
Charge scaling data converters include a binary-weighted capacitor array in their structure. New methods for the placement and sizing of capacitor arrays with increased ratio accuracy and improved converter linearity are presented in this paper. A new model of statistical variation is used, which takes into account both spatial correlation between devices and device area. This is combined with a novel analytical model for the linearity metrics of a charge scaling digital-to-analog converter. Minimizing the variance of the linearity metrics directs a new chessboard placement method for the capacitor array. Chessboard placement is shown to be superior to the state of the art in consideration of both random and systematic mismatch. The new analytical model is then used to develop a flow for capacitor array sizing.
Florin Burcea, Husni M. Habal, Helmut E. Graeb
IEEE Trans. Comput. Aided Des. Integr. Circuits Syst.1