Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maurilio Gutzeit

dblp:180/5638 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Information theory · 70% Approximation and online algorithms · 30%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information theory › probability theory › measure concentration
concentration inequalities
0.312017
Two-Sample Tests for Large Random Graphs Using Network Statistics · COLT 2017
Information theory › hypothesis testing
two-sample testing
0.312017
Two-Sample Tests for Large Random Graphs Using Network Statistics · COLT 2017
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.212016
An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problem · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
pure exploration
0.212016
An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problem · ICML 2016
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit › pure exploration
thresholding bandits
0.212016
An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problem · ICML 2016
Approximation and online algorithms
online algorithms
0.212016
An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problem · ICML 2016
Computational social science and digital humanities
social network analysis
0.112017
Two-Sample Tests for Large Random Graphs Using Network Statistics · COLT 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

minimax optimality · 0.6concentration of measure · 0.6upper and lower bounds · 0.5parameter-free algorithm · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Two-Sample Tests for Large Random Graphs Using Network Statistics
abstract
We consider a two-sample hypothesis testing problem, where the distributions are defined on the space of undirected graphs, and one has access to only one observation from each model. A motivating example for this problem is comparing the friendship networks on Facebook and LinkedIn. The practical approach to such problems is to compare the networks based on certain network statistics. In this paper, we present a general principle for two-sample hypothesis testing in such scenarios without making any assumption about the network generation process. The main contribution of the paper is a general formulation of the problem based on concentration of network statistics, and consequently, a consistent two-sample test that arises as the natural solution for this problem. We also show that the proposed test is minimax optimal for certain network statistics.
Debarghya Ghoshdastidar, Maurilio Gutzeit, Alexandra Carpentier, Ulrike von Luxburg
COLT2
2016 An optimal algorithm for the Thresholding Bandit Problem
abstract
We study a specific combinatorial pure exploration stochastic bandit problem where the learner aims at finding the set of arms whose means are above a given threshold, up to a given precision, and for a fixed time horizon. We propose a parameter-free algorithm based on an original heuristic, and prove that it is optimal for this problem by deriving matching upper and lower bounds. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first non-trivial pure exploration setting with fixed budget for which provably optimal strategies are constructed.
Andrea Locatelli, Maurilio Gutzeit, Alexandra Carpentier
ICML2