Abstract Modern machine learning (ML) systems commonly use stochastic gradient descent (SGD) to train ML models. However, SGD relies on random data order to converge, which usually requires a full data shuffle. For in-DB ML systems and deep learning systems with large datasets stored onblock-addressable secondary storagesuch as HDD and SSD, this full data shuffle leads to low I/O performance—the data shuffling time can be even longer than the training itself, due to massive random data accesses. To balance the convergence rate of SGD (which favors data randomness) and its I/O performance (which favors sequential access), previous work has proposed several data shuffling strategies. In this paper, we first perform an empirical study on existing data shuffling strategies, showing that these strategies suffer from either low performance or low convergence rate. To solve this problem, we propose a simple but noveltwo-leveldata shuffling strategy named , which canavoida full data shuffle while maintainingcomparableconvergence rate of SGD as if a full shuffle were performed. We further theoretically analyze the convergence behavior of and empirically evaluate its efficacy in both in-DB ML and deep learning systems. For in-DB ML systems, we integrate into PostgreSQL by introducing three newphysicaloperators with optimizations. For deep learning systems, we extend single-process to multi-process for the parallel/distributed environment and integrate it into PyTorch. Our evaluation shows that can achieve comparable convergence rate with the full-shuffle-based SGD for both linear models and deep learning models. For in-DB ML with linear models, is 1.6 $$\times $$ × $$-$$ - 12.8 $$\times $$ × faster than two state-of-the-art systems, Apache MADlib and Bismarck, on both HDD and SSD. For deep learning models on ImageNet, is 1.5 $$\times $$ × faster than PyTorch with full data shuffle.

Stochastic gradient descent (SGD) is the cornerstone of modern ML systems. Despite its computational efficiency, SGD requires random data access that is inherently inefficient when implemented in systems that rely on block-addressable secondary storage such as HDD and SSD, e.g., in-DB ML systems and TensorFlow/PyTorch over large files. To address this impedance mismatch, various data shuffling strategies have been proposed to balance the convergence rate of SGD (which favors randomness) and its I/O performance (which favors sequential access).

The appeal of serverless (FaaS) has triggered a growing interest on how to use it in data-intensive applications such as ETL, query processing, or machine learning (ML). Several systems exist for training large-scale ML models on top of serverless infrastructures (e.g., AWS Lambda) but with inconclusive results in terms of their performance and relative advantage over "serverful" infrastructures (IaaS). In this paper we present a systematic, comparative study of distributed ML training over FaaS and IaaS. We present a design space covering design choices such as optimization algorithms and synchronization protocols, and implement a platform, LambdaML, that enables a fair comparison between FaaS and IaaS. We present experimental results using LambdaML, and further develop an analytic model to capture cost/performance tradeoffs that must be considered when opting for a serverless infrastructure. Our results indicate that ML training pays off in serverless only for models with efficient (i.e., reduced) communication and that quickly converge. In general, FaaS can be much faster but it is never significantly cheaper than IaaS.

Recent years have witnessed a growing list of systems for distributed data-parallel training. Existing systems largely fit into two paradigms, i.e., parameter server and MPI-style collective operations. On the algorithmic side, researchers have proposed a wide range of techniques to lower the communication via "system relaxations": quantization, decentralization, and communication delay. However, most, if not all, existing systems only rely on standard synchronous and asynchronous stochastic gradient (SG) based optimization, therefore, cannot take advantage of all possible optimizations that the machine learning community has been developing recently. Given this emerging gap between the current landscapes of systems and theory, we build Bagua, a MPI-style communication library, providing a collection of primitives, that is both flexible and modular to support state-of-the-art system relaxation techniques of distributed training. Powered by this design, Bagua has a great ability to implement and extend various state-of-the-art distributed learning algorithms. In a production cluster with up to 16 machines (128 GPUs), Bagua can outperform PyTorch-DDP, Horovod and BytePS in the end-to-end training time by a significant margin (up to 2X) across a diverse range of tasks. Moreover, we conduct a rigorous tradeoff exploration showing that different algorithms and system relaxations achieve the best performance over different network conditions.