Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marcin Magnus

dblp:180/8163 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0002-5232-2234ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis › sequence assembly
fragment assembly
0.712023
RNA 3D structure modeling by fragment assembly with small-angle X-ray scattering restraints · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA 3D structure modeling
0.712023
RNA 3D structure modeling by fragment assembly with small-angle X-ray scattering restraints · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics
RNA structure prediction
0.712023
RNA 3D structure modeling by fragment assembly with small-angle X-ray scattering restraints · Bioinform. 2023
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural biology
small angle x-ray scattering analysis
0.212023
RNA 3D structure modeling by fragment assembly with small-angle X-ray scattering restraints · Bioinform. 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

fragment assembly · 0.7SAXS restraints · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 RNA 3D structure modeling by fragment assembly with small-angle X-ray scattering restraints
abstract
SUMMARY: Structure determination is a key step in the functional characterization of many non-coding RNA molecules. High-resolution RNA 3D structure determination efforts, however, are not keeping up with the pace of discovery of new non-coding RNA sequences. This increases the importance of computational approaches and low-resolution experimental data, such as from the small-angle X-ray scattering experiments. We present RNA Masonry, a computer program and a web service for a fully automated modeling of RNA 3D structures. It assemblies RNA fragments into geometrically plausible models that meet user-provided secondary structure constraints, restraints on tertiary contacts, and small-angle X-ray scattering data. We illustrate the method description with detailed benchmarks and its application to structural studies of viral RNAs with SAXS restraints. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The program web server is available at http://iimcb.genesilico.pl/rnamasonry. The source code is available at https://gitlab.com/gchojnowski/rnamasonry.
Grzegorz Chojnowski, Rafal Zaborowski, Marcin Magnus, Sunandan Mukherjee, Janusz M. Bujnicki
Bioinform.3
2019 RNA 3D structure prediction guided by independent folding of homologous sequences
abstract
BACKGROUND: The understanding of the importance of RNA has dramatically changed over recent years. As in the case of proteins, the function of an RNA molecule is encoded in its tertiary structure, which in turn is determined by the molecule's sequence. The prediction of tertiary structures of complex RNAs is still a challenging task. RESULTS: Using the observation that RNA sequences from the same RNA family fold into conserved structure, we test herein whether parallel modeling of RNA homologs can improve ab initio RNA structure prediction. EvoClustRNA is a multi-step modeling process, in which homologous sequences for the target sequence are selected using the Rfam database. Subsequently, independent folding simulations using Rosetta FARFAR and SimRNA are carried out. The model of the target sequence is selected based on the most common structural arrangement of the common helical fragments. As a test, on two blind RNA-Puzzles challenges, EvoClustRNA predictions ranked as the first of all submissions for the L-glutamine riboswitch and as the second for the ZMP riboswitch. Moreover, through a benchmark of known structures, we discovered several cases in which particular homologs were unusually amenable to structure recovery in folding simulations compared to the single original target sequence. CONCLUSION: This work, for the first time to our knowledge, demonstrates the importance of the selection of the target sequence from an alignment of an RNA family for the success of RNA 3D structure prediction. These observations prompt investigations into a new direction of research for checking 3D structure "foldability" or "predictability" of related RNA sequences to obtain accurate predictions. To support new research in this area, we provide all relevant scripts in a documented and ready-to-use form. By exploring new ideas and identifying limitations of the current RNA 3D structure prediction methods, this work is bringing us closer to the near-native computational RNA 3D models.
Marcin Magnus, Kalli Kappel, Rhiju Das, Janusz M. Bujnicki
BMC Bioinform.1