Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sreevani
dblp:181/0280
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining › feature engineering
compound feature generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bridging Feature Selection and Extraction: Compound Feature Generation (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2017 |
Data mining
dimensionality reduction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Bridging Feature Selection and Extraction: Compound Feature Generation (Extended Abstract) · ICDE 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
minimum redundancy · 0.3minimum projection error · 0.3iterative approximation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Generation of compound features based on feature interaction for classification
Sreevani, Late C. A. Murthy, Bhabatosh Chanda |
Expert Syst. Appl. | 1 |
| 2017 | Bridging Feature Selection and Extraction: Compound Feature Generation (Extended Abstract)abstractA new strategy for Dimensionality Reduction with the aim of providing reduced set with both original and combinations of features is studied. For this purpose, a framework called Minimum Projection error and Minimum Redundancy (MPeMR) to generate orthogonal compound (both original and combinations) features by minimizing both projection error and redundancy among them is proposed. An iterative approximation method under the proposed framework is also presented. Using different measures for projection error, redundancy and representative feature selection, three supervised and three unsupervised methods are considered. Experimental results are compared with both state-of-the-art feature selection and extraction methods, in both supervised and unsupervised cases, and proposed CFG methods outperform these methods. In each stage of the proposed approximation method, pairs of features are considered i.e., NPe is calculated based on two features and removal of redundancy is also based on two features. Instead of (2, 2), one could have considered (2, 3), or (3, 2) or any other such combination of features. Further research is focused along this direction. Sreevani, Late C. A. Murthy |
ICDE | 1 |