Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Brian Goldfain
dblp:181/4171
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-0754-8354ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Autonomous driving · 14% Reinforcement learning · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control |
1.2 | 4 | 2018 | Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018 Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles · ICRA 2018 Information theoretic MPC for model-based reinforcement learning · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
multi-robot control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles · ICRA 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
sampling-based model predictive control |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles · ICRA 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Information theoretic MPC for model-based reinforcement learning · ICRA 2017 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control · ICRA 2016 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stochastic optimal control |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control · ICRA 2016 |
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
stochastic control |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
information-theoretic optimization · 0.7cross-entropy method · 0.7iterated best response · 0.3information-theoretic model predictive control · 0.3neural network dynamics model · 0.3information theoretic control · 0.3relative entropy · 0.2path integral control · 0.2importance sampling · 0.2free energy · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground VehiclesabstractWe introduce an algorithm for autonomous control of multiple fast ground vehicles operating in close proximity to each other. The algorithm is based on a combination of the game theoretic notion of iterated best response, and an information theoretic model predictive control algorithm designed for non-linear stochastic systems. We test the algorithm on two one-fifth scale AutoRally platforms traveling at speeds upwards of 8 meters per second, while maintaining a following distance of under two meters from bumper-to-bumper. Grady Williams, Brian Goldfain, Paul Drews, James M. Rehg, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICRA | 2 |
| 2018 | Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous DrivingabstractWe present an information-theoretic approach to stochastic optimal control problems that can be used to derive general sampling-based optimization schemes. This new mathematical method is used to develop a sampling-based model predictive control algorithm. We apply this information-theoretic model predictive control scheme to the task of aggressive autonomous driving around a dirt test track, and compare its performance with a model predictive control version of the cross-entropy method. Grady Williams, Paul Drews, Brian Goldfain, James M. Rehg, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
IEEE Trans. Robotics | 3 |
| 2017 | Information theoretic MPC for model-based reinforcement learningabstractWe introduce an information theoretic model predictive control (MPC) algorithm capable of handling complex cost criteria and general nonlinear dynamics. The generality of the approach makes it possible to use multi-layer neural networks as dynamics models, which we incorporate into our MPC algorithm in order to solve model-based reinforcement learning tasks. We test the algorithm in simulation on a cart-pole swing up and quadrotor navigation task, as well as on actual hardware in an aggressive driving task. Empirical results demonstrate that the algorithm is capable of achieving a high level of performance and does so only utilizing data collected from the system. Grady Williams, Nolan Wagener, Brian Goldfain, Paul Drews, James M. Rehg, Byron Boots, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICRA | 3 |
| 2016 | Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral controlabstractIn this paper we present a model predictive control algorithm designed for optimizing non-linear systems subject to complex cost criteria. The algorithm is based on a stochastic optimal control framework using a fundamental relationship between the information theoretic notions of free energy and relative entropy. The optimal controls in this setting take the form of a path integral, which we approximate using an efficient importance sampling scheme. We experimentally verify the algorithm by implementing it on a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) and apply it to the problem of controlling a fifth-scale Auto-Rally vehicle in an aggressive driving task. Grady Williams, Paul Drews, Brian Goldfain, James M. Rehg, Evangelos A. Theodorou |
ICRA | 3 |