Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Siyue Zhang

dblp:181/6460 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
2as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
6 papers
Information retrieval · 100%
Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Question answering and dialogue systems · 23% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 23% Generative modeling · 23%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › document retrieval
reasoning-intensive retrieval
2.932026
Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026
A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges · ACL (1) 2026
LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval models
1.322026
Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026
SportReason: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning across Tables and Text for Sports Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
reranking
1.122025
LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking · EMNLP 2025
SportReason: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning across Tables and Text for Sports Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
1.012026
Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › evaluation › test collection
retrieval benchmark
1.012026
Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › image retrieval
composed image retrieval
1.012026
Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image Editing · ACL (1) 2026
Multimedia analysis and retrieval
image retrieval
1.012026
Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image Editing · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › discrete diffusion model
diffusion language model
0.912025
Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective · EMNLP 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › information fusion
multi-evidence reasoning
0.912025
SportReason: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning across Tables and Text for Sports Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
RPDR: A Round-trip Prediction-Based Data Augmentation Framework for Long-Tail Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › knowledge-intensive question answering › knowledge-grounded question answering
retrieval-augmented question answering
0.912025
SportReason: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning across Tables and Text for Sports Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › retrieval models › neural retrieval
dense retrieval
0.912025
RPDR: A Round-trip Prediction-Based Data Augmentation Framework for Long-Tail Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
0.912025
SportReason: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning across Tables and Text for Sports Question Answering · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval › document processing › document analysis › document representation
text embedding
0.912025
Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
agentic search
0.312026
Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems · ACL (1) 2026
Information retrieval › multi-stage retrieval
retrieval and reranking
0.312026
A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.312025
LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking · EMNLP 2025
Information retrieval
document retrieval
0.312025
Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective · EMNLP 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

synthetic data generation · 3.5large language model · 2.7fine-tuning · 1.7dynamic routing · 1.7diffusion language model · 1.7bidirectional attention · 1.7agentic RAG · 1.7synthetic corpus generation · 1.0image editing · 1.0hard negatives · 1.0LoRA fine-tuning · 1.0round-trip prediction · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Rethinking Composed Image Retrieval Evaluation: A Fine-Grained Benchmark from Image Editing
abstract
Tingyu Song, Yanzhao Zhang, Mingxin Li, Zhuoning Guo, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao, Shu Wu. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Tingyu Song, Yanzhao Zhang, Zhuoning Guo, Dingkun Long, Pengjun Xie, Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao 0001
ACL (1)7
2026 A Survey of Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Progress and Challenges
abstract
Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval (RIR) targets retrieval settings where relevance is mediated by latent inferential links between a query and supporting evidence, rather than semantic similarity.Motivated by the emergent reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent work integrates these capabilities into the IR field, spanning the entire pipeline from benchmarks to retrievers and rerankers.Despite this progress, the field lacks a systematic framework to organize current efforts and articulate a clear path forward.To provide a clear roadmap for this rapidly growing yet fragmented area, this survey (1) systematizes existing RIR benchmarks by knowledge domains and modalities, providing a detailed analysis of the current landscape; (2) introduces a structured taxonomy that categorizes methods based on where and how reasoning is integrated into the retrieval pipeline, alongside an analysis of their tradeoffs and practical applications; and (3) summarizes challenges and future directions to guide research in this evolving field.
Yiyang Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao 0001
ACL (1)3
2026 Rethinking Reasoning-Intensive Retrieval: Evaluating and Advancing Retrievers in Agentic Search Systems
abstract
Reasoning-intensive retrieval aims to surface evidence that supports downstream reasoning rather than merely matching topical similarity.This capability is increasingly important for agentic search systems, where retrievers must provide complementary evidence across iterative search and synthesis.However, existing work remains limited on both evaluation and training: benchmarks such as BRIGHT provide narrow gold sets and evaluate retrievers in isolation, while synthetic training corpora often optimize single-passage relevance rather than evidence portfolio construction.We introduce BRIGHT-PRO, an expert-annotated benchmark that expands each query with multi-aspect gold evidence and evaluates retrievers under both static and agentic search protocols.We further construct RTriever-Synth, an aspect-decomposed synthetic corpus that generates complementary positives and positive-conditioned hard negatives, and use it to LoRA fine-tune RTriever-4B from Qwen3-Embedding-4B.Experiments across lexical, general-purpose, and reasoningintensive retrievers show that aspect-aware and agentic evaluation expose behaviors hidden by standard metrics, while RTriever-4B substantially improves over its base model.
Yilun Zhao 0001, Jinbiao Wei, Tingyu Song, Siyue Zhang, Chen Zhao 0013, Arman Cohan
ACL (1)4
2026 RoATR: A Systematic Study of Audio-Text Retrieval Robustness Against Realistic Perturbations
abstract
Multimodal retrieval enables effective access to information across diverse modalities such as text, images, audio, and video. Audio–Text Retrieval (ATR), which retrieves relevant text given an audio query, is a key component in real-world applications including voice-enabled AI assistants and audio-integrated retrieval systems. Existing ATR methods primarily focus on aligning audio and textual semantics in a shared embedding space through contrastive learning or multimodal large language model backbones, while their robustness under realistic acoustic conditions remains largely unexplored. To bridge this gap, we introduce RoATR, a diagnostic benchmark for evaluating the Robustness of ATR systems, inspired by prior robustness studies in automatic speech recognition. RoATR defines five perturbation categories that cover eleven realistic perturbation types, including background noise, speaker variability, and device distortion. Extensive experiments on state-of-the-art ATR models reveal substantial and heterogeneous performance degradation across perturbation types. For example, LCO-Embedding suffers up to a 28.0% absolute drop in Recall@1 while no degradation under city noise. To improve the robustness of ATR models, we further propose perturbation-augmented training based on perturbed data curated following the same pipeline as RoATR, which achieves an average improvement of 16.0 percentage points in Recall@1.
Siyue Zhang, Yilei Shi
ICMR4
2025 SportReason: Evaluating Retrieval-Augmented Reasoning across Tables and Text for Sports Question Answering
abstract
We present SPORTREASON, a benchmark for retrieval-augmented reasoning on numerical sports questions.Unlike existing benchmarks limited to one or two evidence units, SPORTREASON requires combining and reasoning across free-text, structured tables, and semi-structured infoboxes.We provide 3,000 human-verified QA pairs by repurposing existing QA and table generation datasets, and by prompting large language models (LLMs).Each pair is grounded in multiple evidence from a multi-modal Wikipedia corpus containing 200K knowledge contexts.We evaluate existing retrievers and rerankers, along with agentic Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems.The experimental results show that multi-evidence retrieval remains a challenge.Agentic RAG systems (e.g., Search-o1), despite iterative retrieval and reasoning capabilities, fail to improve performance due to imprecise query generation and distracting retrieval information.
Kaiyue Feng, Siyue Zhang, Bingsen Chen, Yilun Zhao 0001, Chen Zhao 0013
EMNLP2
2025 LimRank: Less is More for Reasoning-Intensive Information Reranking
abstract
Existing approaches typically rely on largescale fine-tuning to adapt LLMs for information reranking tasks, which is computationally expensive.In this work, we demonstrate that modern LLMs can be effectively adapted using only minimal, high-quality supervision.To enable this, we design LIMRANK-SYNTHESIZER, a reusable and open-source pipeline for generating diverse, challenging, and realistic reranking examples.Using this synthetic data, we finetune our reranker model, LIMRANK.We evaluate LIMRANK on two challenging benchmarks, i.e., BRIGHT for reasoning-intensive retrieval and FOLLOWIR for instruction-following retrieval.Our experiments demonstrate that LIMRANK achieves competitive performance, while being trained on less than 5% of the data typically used in prior work.Further ablation studies demonstrate the effectiveness of LIMRANK-SYNTHESIZER and the strong generalization capabilities of LIMRANK across downstream tasks, including scientific literature search and retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive problem solving. yale-nlp/LimRank
Tingyu Song, Yilun Zhao 0001, Siyue Zhang, Chen Zhao 0013, Arman Cohan
EMNLP3
2025 Diffusion vs. Autoregressive Language Models: A Text Embedding Perspective
abstract
Large language model (LLM)-based embedding models, benefiting from large scale pretraining and post-training, have begun to surpass BERT and T5-based models on generalpurpose text embedding tasks such as document retrieval.However, a fundamental limitation of LLM embeddings lies in the unidirectional attention used during autoregressive pre-training, which misaligns with the bidirectional nature of text embedding tasks.To this end, we propose adopting diffusion language models for text embeddings, motivated by their inherent bidirectional architecture and recent success in matching or surpassing LLMs especially on reasoning tasks.We present the first systematic study of the diffusion language embedding model, which outperforms the LLM-based embedding model by 20% on long-document retrieval, 8% on reasoning-intensive retrieval, 2% on instruction-following retrieval, and achieve competitive performance on traditional text embedding benchmarks.Our analysis verifies that bidirectional attention is crucial for encoding global context in long and complex text.
Siyue Zhang, Yilun Zhao 0001, Liyuan Geng, Arman Cohan, Anh Tuan Luu, Chen Zhao 0013
EMNLP1
2025 RPDR: A Round-trip Prediction-Based Data Augmentation Framework for Long-Tail Question Answering
abstract
Long-tail question answering presents significant challenges for large language models (LLMs) due to their limited ability to acquire and accurately recall less common knowledge.Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems have shown great promise in mitigating this limitation by integrating external retrieval mechanisms.However, dense retrieval models often face the same difficulties when generalizing to rare or niche knowledge.In this study, we introduce RPDR, a novel data augmentation framework that selects high-quality easy-to-learn training data, to enhance dense retrievers.Our approach is built around three core components: synthetic data generation, data selection with Round-Trip prediction to identify easy-to-learn instances, and retriever training with these instances.We evaluate RPDR on two longtail retrieval benchmarks, POPQA and ENTI-TYQUESTIONS, demonstrating substantial improvements over existing retrievers like BM25 and Contriver, especially on extremely longtail categories.We identify the strengths and limitations of RPDR through detailed human analysis and propose a dynamic routing mechanism to dynamically route queries to specialized retrieval modules to further improve retrieval performance.
Siyue Zhang
EMNLP2
2023 Sustainable AIGC Workload Scheduling of Geo-Distributed Data Centers: A Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning Approach
abstract
Recent breakthroughs in generative artificial intelligence have triggered a surge in demand for machine learning training, which poses significant cost burdens and environmental challenges due to its substantial energy consumption. Scheduling training jobs among geographically distributed cloud data centers unveils the opportunity to optimize the usage of computing capacity powered by inexpensive and low-carbon energy and address the issue of workload imbalance. To tackle the challenge of multi-objective scheduling, i.e., maximizing GPU utilization while reducing operational costs, we propose an algorithm based on multi-agent reinforcement learning and actor-critic methods to learn the optimal collaborative scheduling strategy through interacting with a cloud system built with real-life workload patterns, energy prices, and carbon intensities. Compared with other algorithms, our proposed method improves the system utility by up to 28.6% attributable to higher GPU utilization, lower energy cost, and less carbon emission.
Siyue Zhang, Minrui Xu, Wei Yang Bryan Lim, Dusit Niyato
GLOBECOM1