Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Pei-Yuan Sung

dblp:181/6667 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics › genetic association study
family-based association test
0.212016
An efficient gene-gene interaction test for genome-wide association studies in trio families · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
gene-gene interaction
0.212016
An efficient gene-gene interaction test for genome-wide association studies in trio families · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study
0.212016
An efficient gene-gene interaction test for genome-wide association studies in trio families · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology
statistical genetics
0.212016
An efficient gene-gene interaction test for genome-wide association studies in trio families · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

simulation study · 0.2interlocus correlation test · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 An efficient gene-gene interaction test for genome-wide association studies in trio families
abstract
MOTIVATION: Several efficient gene-gene interaction tests have been developed for unrelated case-control samples in genome-wide association studies (GWAS), making it possible to test tens of billions of interaction pairs of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in a reasonable timeframe. However, current family-based gene-gene interaction tests are computationally expensive and are not applicable to genome-wide interaction analysis. RESULTS: We developed an efficient family-based gene-gene interaction test, GCORE, for trios (i.e. two parents and one affected sib). The GCORE compares interlocus correlations at two SNPs between the transmitted and non-transmitted alleles. We used simulation studies to compare the statistical properties such as type I error rates and power for the GCORE with several other family-based interaction tests under various scenarios. We applied the GCORE to a family-based GWAS for autism consisting of approximately 2000 trios. Testing a total of 22 471 383 013 interaction pairs in the GWAS can be finished in 36 h by the GCORE without large-scale computing resources, demonstrating that the test is practical for genome-wide gene-gene interaction analysis in trios. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: GCORE is implemented with C ++ and is available at http://gscore.sourceforge.net CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Pei-Yuan Sung, Ya-Wen Yu, Ren-Hua Chung
Bioinform.1
2016 GCORE-sib: An efficient gene-gene interaction tool for genome-wide association studies based on discordant sib pairs
abstract
BACKGROUND: A computationally efficient tool is required for a genome-wide gene-gene interaction analysis that tests an extremely large number of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) interaction pairs in genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Current tools for GWAS interaction analysis are mainly developed for unrelated case-control samples. Relatively fewer tools for interaction analysis are available for complex disease studies with family-based design, and these tools tend to be computationally expensive. RESULTS: We developed a fast gene-gene interaction test, GCORE-sib, for discordant sib pairs and implemented the test into an efficient tool. We used simulations to demonstrate that the GCORE-sib has correct type I error rates and has comparable power to that of the regression-based interaction test. We also showed that the GCORE-sib can run more than 10 times faster than the regression-based test. Finally, the GCORE-sib was applied to a GWAS dataset with approximately 2,000 discordant sib pairs, and the GCORE-sib finished testing 19,368,078,382 pairs of SNPs within 6 days. CONCLUSIONS: An efficient gene-gene interaction tool for discordant sib pairs was developed. It will be very useful for genome-wide gene-gene interaction analysis in GWAS using discordant sib pairs. The tool can be downloaded for free at http://gcore-sib.sourceforge.net .
Pei-Yuan Sung, Chao A. Hsiung, Ren-Hua Chung
BMC Bioinform.1