VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Bloem-Reddy
dblp:182/8938
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 3 first-author · 5 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 56% Representation and self-supervised learning · 25% Learning theory · 7% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
bivariate causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal model
structural causal model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
information-theoretic representation learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Lossy Compression for Lossless Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Lossy Compression for Lossless Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › information-theoretic analysis
rate distortion theory |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Lossy Compression for Lossless Prediction · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › equivariant neural network
invariant network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Probabilistic Symmetries and Invariant Neural Networks · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
deep latent variable model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable Models · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Slice Sampling on Hamiltonian Trajectories · ICML 2016 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Slice Sampling on Hamiltonian Trajectories · ICML 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score matching · 0.9measure transport · 0.9dynamical systems · 0.9unsupervised objective · 0.5information bottleneck · 0.5probabilistic symmetries · 0.4group representation theory · 0.4slice sampling · 0.2hamiltonian monte carlo · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Identifying Metric Structures of Deep Latent Variable ModelsabstractDeep latent variable models learn condensed representations of data that, hopefully, reflect the inner workings of the studied phenomena. Unfortunately, these latent representations are not statistically identifiable, meaning they cannot be uniquely determined. Domain experts, therefore, need to tread carefully when interpreting these. Current solutions limit the lack of identifiability through additional constraints on the latent variable model, e.g. by requiring labeled training data, or by restricting the expressivity of the model. We change the goal: instead of identifying the latent variables, we identify relationships between them such as meaningful distances, angles, and volumes. We prove this is feasible under very mild model conditions and without additional labeled data. We empirically demonstrate that our theory results in more reliable latent distances, offering a principled path forward in extracting trustworthy conclusions from deep latent variable models. Stas Syrota, Yevgen Zainchkovskyy, Johnny Xi, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Søren Hauberg |
ICML | 4 |
| 2025 | Distinguishing Cause from Effect with Causal Velocity ModelsabstractBivariate structural causal models (SCM) are often used to infer causal direction by examining their goodness-of-fit under restricted model classes. In this paper, we describe a parametrization of bivariate SCMs in terms of a causal velocity by viewing the cause variable as time in a dynamical system. The velocity implicitly defines counterfactual curves via the solution of initial value problems where the observation specifies the initial condition. Using tools from measure transport, we obtain a unique correspondence between SCMs and the score function of the generated distribution via its causal velocity. Based on this, we derive an objective function that directly regresses the velocity against the score function, the latter of which can be estimated non-parametrically from observational data. We use this to develop a method for bivariate causal discovery that extends beyond known model classes such as additive or location-scale noise, and that requires no assumptions on the noise distributions. When the score is estimated well, the objective is also useful for detecting model non–identifiability and misspecification. We present positive results in simulation and benchmark experiments where many existing methods fail, and perform ablation studies to examine the method’s sensitivity to accurate score estimation. Johnny Xi, Hugh Dance, Peter Orbanz, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy |
ICML | 4 |
| 2024 | Mixed variational flows for discrete variablesabstractVariational flows allow practitioners to learn complex continuous distributions, but approximating discrete distributions remains a challenge. Current methodologies typically embed the discrete target in a continuous space—usually via continuous relaxation or dequantization—and then apply a continuous flow. These approaches involve a surrogate target that may not capture the original discrete target, might have biased or unstable gradients, and can create a difficult optimization problem. In this work, we develop a variational flow family for discrete distributions without any continuous embedding. First, we develop a measure-preserving and discrete (MAD) invertible map that leaves the discrete target invariant, and then create a mixed variational flow (MAD Mix) based on that map. Our family provides access to i.i.d. sampling and density evaluation with virtually no tuning effort. We also develop an extension to MAD Mix that handles joint discrete and continuous models. Our experiments suggest that MAD Mix produces more reliable approximations than continuous-embedding flows while requiring orders of magnitude less compute. Gian Carlo Diluvi, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Trevor Campbell |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2023 | Indeterminacy in Generative Models: Characterization and Strong IdentifiabilityabstractMost modern probabilistic generative models, such as the variational autoencoder (VAE), have certain indeterminacies that are unresolvable even with an infinite amount of data. Different tasks tolerate different indeterminacies, however recent applications have indicated the need for strongly identifiable models, in which an observation corresponds to a unique latent code. Progress has been made towards reducing model indeterminacies while maintaining flexibility, and recent work excludes many—but not all—indeterminacies. In this work, we motivate model-identifiability in terms of task-identifiability, then construct a theoretical framework for analyzing the indeterminacies of latent variable models, which enables their precise characterization in terms of the generator function and prior distribution spaces. We reveal that strong identifiability is possible even with highly flexible nonlinear generators, and give two such examples. One is a straightforward modification of iVAE (Khemakhem et al., 2020); the other uses triangular monotonic maps, leading to novel connections between optimal transport and identifiability. Quanhan Xi, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy |
AISTATS | 2 |
| 2021 | Lossy Compression for Lossless PredictionabstractMost data is automatically collected and only ever "seen" by algorithms. Yet, data compressors preserve perceptual fidelity rather than just the information needed by algorithms performing downstream tasks. In this paper, we characterize the bit-rate required to ensure high performance on all predictive tasks that are invariant under a set of transformations, such as data augmentations. Based on our theory, we design unsupervised objectives for training neural compressors. Using these objectives, we train a generic image compressor that achieves substantial rate savings (more than 1000x on ImageNet) compared to JPEG on 8 datasets, without decreasing downstream classification performance. Yann Dubois, Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Karen Ullrich, Chris J. Maddison |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2020 | Probabilistic Symmetries and Invariant Neural NetworksabstractTreating neural network inputs and outputs as random variables, we characterize the structure of neural networks that can be used to model data that are invariant or equivariant under the action of a compact group. Much recent research has been devoted to encoding invariance under symmetry transformations into neural network architectures, in an effort to improve the performance of deep neural networks in data-scarce, non-i.i.d., or unsupervised settings. By considering group invariance from the perspective of probabilistic symmetry, we establish a link between functional and probabilistic symmetry, and obtain generative functional representations of probability distributions that are invariant or equivariant under the action of a compact group. Our representations completely characterize the structure of neural networks that can be used to model such distributions and yield a general program for constructing invariant stochastic or deterministic neural networks. We demonstrate that examples from the recent literature are special cases, and develop the details of the general program for exchangeable sequences and arrays. Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Yee Whye Teh |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2018 | Sampling and Inference for Beta Neutral-to-the-Left Models of Sparse Networks
Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, Adam Foster 0001, Emile Mathieu, Yee Whye Teh |
UAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Slice Sampling on Hamiltonian TrajectoriesabstractHamiltonian Monte Carlo and slice sampling are amongst the most widely used and studied classes of Markov Chain Monte Carlo samplers. We connect these two methods and present Hamiltonian slice sampling, which allows slice sampling to be carried out along Hamiltonian trajectories, or transformations thereof. Hamiltonian slice sampling clarifies a class of model priors that induce closed-form slice samplers. More pragmatically, inheriting properties of slice samplers, it offers advantages over Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, in that it has fewer tunable hyperparameters and does not require gradient information. We demonstrate the utility of Hamiltonian slice sampling out of the box on problems ranging from Gaussian process regression to Pitman-Yor based mixture models. Benjamin Bloem-Reddy, John P. Cunningham |
ICML | 1 |