Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Jing-Cheng Shi

dblp:183/0886 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
2as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-3688-4069ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
5 papers
Mathematical optimization · 78% Approximation and online algorithms · 11% Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 11%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 77% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Information retrieval · 46% Recommender systems · 30% Web and social media mining · 23%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
submodular optimization
0.932017
Subset Selection under Noise · NIPS 2017
Optimizing Ratio of Monotone Set Functions · IJCAI 2017
On Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization › sparse learning
feature selection
0.832017
Subset Selection under Noise · NIPS 2017
On Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · IJCAI 2017
Parallel Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2016
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.622017
Optimizing Ratio of Monotone Set Functions · IJCAI 2017
On Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
bandit optimization
0.612022
Non-stationary Continuum-armed Bandits for Online Hyperparameter Optimization · WSDM 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › multi-armed bandit
continuum-armed bandit
0.612022
Non-stationary Continuum-armed Bandits for Online Hyperparameter Optimization · WSDM 2022
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
greedy algorithm
0.622017
Optimizing Ratio of Monotone Set Functions · IJCAI 2017
On Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints · IJCAI 2017
Mathematical optimization › optimization for machine learning
hyperparameter optimization
0.612022
Non-stationary Continuum-armed Bandits for Online Hyperparameter Optimization · WSDM 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning environment
simulation environment
0.412019
Virtual-Taobao: Virtualizing Real-World Online Retail Environment for Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Mathematical optimization › multi-objective optimization
pareto optimization
0.212016
Parallel Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2016
Information retrieval
online advertising
0.212022
Non-stationary Continuum-armed Bandits for Online Hyperparameter Optimization · WSDM 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer
0.112019
Virtual-Taobao: Virtualizing Real-World Online Retail Environment for Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Web and social media mining › social network analysis
influence maximization
0.112017
Subset Selection under Noise · NIPS 2017
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models
0.112016
Parallel Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection · IJCAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

non-stationary bandits · 1.1dynamic regret · 1.1adaptive discretization · 1.1greedy algorithm · 0.9multiagent adversarial imitation learning · 0.8generative adversarial network · 0.8action norm constraint · 0.8randomized iterative optimization · 0.6noise-aware strategy · 0.6POSS · 0.6pareto optimization · 0.5parallel optimization · 0.5generalized greedy algorithm · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Non-stationary Continuum-armed Bandits for Online Hyperparameter Optimization
abstract
For years, machine learning has become the dominant approach to a variety of information retrieval tasks. The performance of machine learning algorithms heavily depends on their hyperparameters. It is hence critical to identity the optimal hyperparameter configuration when applying machine learning algorithms. Most of existing hyperparameter optimization methods assume a static relationship between hyperparameter configuration and algorithmic performance and are thus not suitable for many information retrieval applications with non-stationary environments such as e-commerce recommendation and online advertising. To address this limitation, we study online hyperparameter optimization, where the hyperparameter configuration is optimized on the fly. We formulate online hyperparameter optimization as a non-stationary continuum-armed bandits problem in which each arm corresponds to a hyperparameter configuration and the algorithmic performance is viewed as reward. For this problem, we develop principled methods with strong theoretical guarantees in terms of dynamic regret. The key idea is to adaptively discretize the continuous arm set and estimate the mean reward of each arm via weighted averaging. As a case application, we show how our methods can be applied to optimize the hyperparameter of vector-based candidate generation algorithm and empirically demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our methods on public advertising dataset and online A/B testing. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, our methods are the first to achieve sub-linear dynamic regret bounds for continuum-armed bandits, which may be of independent interest.
Shiyin Lu, Yu-Hang Zhou, Jing-Cheng Shi, Wenya Zhu, Qingtao Yu, Qing Da, Lijun Zhang 0005
WSDM3
2019 Virtual-Taobao: Virtualizing Real-World Online Retail Environment for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Applying reinforcement learning in physical-world tasks is extremely challenging. It is commonly infeasible to sample a large number of trials, as required by current reinforcement learning methods, in a physical environment. This paper reports our project on using reinforcement learning for better commodity search in Taobao, one of the largest online retail platforms and meanwhile a physical environment with a high sampling cost. Instead of training reinforcement learning in Taobao directly, we present our environment-building approach: we build Virtual-Taobao, a simulator learned from historical customer behavior data, and then we train policies in Virtual-Taobao with no physical sampling costs. To improve the simulation precision, we propose GAN-SD (GAN for Simulating Distributions) for customer feature generation with better matched distribution; we propose MAIL (Multiagent Adversarial Imitation Learning) for generating better generalizable customer actions. To further avoid overfitting the imperfection of the simulator, we propose ANC (Action Norm Constraint) strategy to regularize the policy model. In experiments, Virtual-Taobao is trained from hundreds of millions of real Taobao customers’ records. Compared with the real Taobao, Virtual-Taobao faithfully recovers important properties of the real environment. We further show that the policies trained purely in Virtual-Taobao, which has zero physical sampling cost, can have significantly superior real-world performance to the traditional supervised approaches, through online A/B tests. We hope this work may shed some light on applying reinforcement learning in complex physical environments.
Jing-Cheng Shi, Yang Yu 0001, Qing Da, Shi-Yong Chen, Anxiang Zeng
AAAI1
2018 Constrained Monotone k-Submodular Function Maximization Using Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms With Theoretical Guarantee
abstract
The problem of maximizing monotonek-submodular functions under a size constraint arises in many applications, and it is NP-hard. In this paper, we propose a new approach which employs a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to maximize the given objective and minimize the size simultaneously. For general cases, we prove that the proposed method can obtain the asymptotically tight approximation guarantee, which was also achieved by the greedy algorithm. Moreover, we further give instances where the proposed approach performs better than the greedy algorithm on applications of influence maximization, information coverage maximization, and sensor placement. Experimental results on real-world data sets exhibit the superior performance of the proposed approach.
Chao Qian 0001, Jing-Cheng Shi, Ke Tang 0001, Zhi-Hua Zhou
IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput.2
2017 Evolutionary multi-objective optimization made faster by sequential decomposition
abstract
Multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) can be mainly divided into set approximation methods and decomposition methods. The former approximates the Pareto front by the whole population directly, while the latter solves decomposed subproblems. The theoretical understanding of these methods is, however, quite insufficient. In this paper, we try to gain more understanding by investigating a combination of set approximation MOEAs with a sequential decomposition mechanism. Our theoretical analysis shows that, the combination achieves a better running time than the corresponding set approximation MOEAs by a factor n (the problem size) on synthetic problems as well as the minimum spanning tree problem, which hints that the two types of MOEAs might be mutually complemental.
Jing-Cheng Shi, Chao Qian 0001, Yang Yu 0001
CEC1
2017 On Subset Selection with General Cost Constraints
abstract
This paper considers the subset selection problem with a monotone objective function and a monotone cost constraint, which relaxes the submodular property of previous studies. We first show that the approximation ratio of the generalized greedy algorithm is $\frac{\alpha}{2}(1 \textendash \frac{1}{e^{\alpha}})$ (where $\alpha$ is the submodularity ratio); and then propose POMC, an anytime randomized iterative approach that can utilize more time to find better solutions than the generalized greedy algorithm. We show that POMC can obtain the same general approximation guarantee as the generalized greedy algorithm, but can achieve better solutions in cases and applications.
Chao Qian 0001, Jing-Cheng Shi, Yang Yu 0001, Ke Tang 0001
IJCAI2
2017 Optimizing Ratio of Monotone Set Functions
abstract
This paper considers the problem of minimizing the ratio of two set functions, i.e., $f/g$. Previous work assumed monotone and submodular of the two functions, while we consider a more general situation where $g$ is not necessarily submodular. We derive that the greedy approach GreedRatio, as a fixed time algorithm, achieves a $\frac{|X^*|}{(1+(|X^*| \textendash 1)(1 \textendash \kappa_f))\gamma(g)}$ approximation ratio, which also improves the previous bound for submodular $g$. If more time can be spent, we present the PORM algorithm, an anytime randomized iterative approach minimizing $f$ and $\textendash g$ simultaneously. We show that PORM using reasonable time has the same general approximation guarantee as GreedRatio, but can achieve better solutions in cases and applications.
Chao Qian 0001, Jing-Cheng Shi, Yang Yu 0001, Ke Tang 0001, Zhi-Hua Zhou
IJCAI2
2017 Subset Selection under Noise
abstract
The problem of selecting the best $k$-element subset from a universe is involved in many applications. While previous studies assumed a noise-free environment or a noisy monotone submodular objective function, this paper considers a more realistic and general situation where the evaluation of a subset is a noisy monotone function (not necessarily submodular), with both multiplicative and additive noises. To understand the impact of the noise, we firstly show the approximation ratio of the greedy algorithm and POSS, two powerful algorithms for noise-free subset selection, in the noisy environments. We then propose to incorporate a noise-aware strategy into POSS, resulting in the new PONSS algorithm. We prove that PONSS can achieve a better approximation ratio under some assumption such as i.i.d. noise distribution. The empirical results on influence maximization and sparse regression problems show the superior performance of PONSS.
Chao Qian 0001, Jing-Cheng Shi, Yang Yu 0001, Ke Tang 0001, Zhi-Hua Zhou
NIPS2
2016 Parallel Pareto Optimization for Subset Selection
Chao Qian 0001, Jing-Cheng Shi, Yang Yu 0001, Ke Tang 0001, Zhi-Hua Zhou
IJCAI2