Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sai P. Selvaraj

dblp:183/0945 · also Sai Pandi Selvaraj · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 60% Reinforcement learning · 29% Robot manipulation · 11%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization
0.712023
Improving Summarization with Human Edits · EMNLP 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback
learning from human feedback
0.712023
Improving Summarization with Human Edits · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization
0.712023
Improving Summarization with Human Edits · EMNLP 2023
Robotics › Robot manipulation
human-robot interaction
0.212016
Verbalization: Narration of Autonomous Robot Experience · IJCAI 2016
Medical and health informatics › clinical text processing
clinical text summarization
0.212023
Improving Summarization with Human Edits · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation
0.112016
Verbalization: Narration of Autonomous Robot Experience · IJCAI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sequence alignment likelihood training · 1.3direct preference optimization · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Improving Summarization with Human Edits
abstract
Recent work has shown the promise of learning with human feedback paradigms to produce human-determined high-quality text.Existing works use human feedback to train large language models (LLMs) in general domain abstractive summarization and have obtained summary quality exceeding traditional likelihood training.In this paper, we focus on a less explored form of human feedback -Human Edits.We propose Sequence Alignment (un)Likelihood Training (SALT), a novel technique to use both the human-edited and modelgenerated data together in the training loop.In addition, we demonstrate simulating Human Edits with ground truth summaries coming from existing training data -Imitation edits, along with the model-generated summaries obtained after the training, to reduce the need for expensive human-edit data.In our experiments, we extend human feedback exploration from general domain summarization to medical domain summarization.Our results 1 demonstrate the effectiveness of SALT in improving the summary quality with Human and Imitation Edits.Through additional experiments, we show that SALT outperforms the conventional RLHF method (designed for human preferences) -DPO, when applied to human-edit data.We hope the evidence in our paper prompts researchers to explore, collect and better use different human feedback approaches scalably.
Zonghai Yao, Benjamin J. Schloss, Sai P. Selvaraj
EMNLP3
2016 Verbalization: Narration of Autonomous Robot Experience
Stephanie Rosenthal, Sai P. Selvaraj, Manuela M. Veloso
IJCAI2
2016 Dynamic generation and refinement of robot verbalization
abstract
With a growing number of robots performing autonomously without human intervention, it is difficult to understand what the robots experience along their routes during execution without looking at execution logs. Rather than looking through logs, our goal is for robots to respond to queries in natural language about what they experience and what routes they have chosen. We propose verbalization as the process of converting route experiences into natural language, and highlight the importance of varying verbalizations based on user preferences. We present our verbalization space representing different dimensions that verbalizations can be varied, and our algorithm for automatically generating them on our CoBot robot. Then we present our study of how users can request different verbalizations in dialog. Using the study data, we learn a language model to map user dialog to the verbalization space. Finally, we demonstrate the use of the learned model within a dialog system in order for any user to request information about CoBot's route experience at varying levels of detail.
Vittorio Perera, Sai P. Selvaraj, Stephanie Rosenthal, Manuela M. Veloso
RO-MAN2