VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex Warren
dblp:183/1635
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 38% Video understanding and tracking · 31% 3D vision · 31% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50% Image and video processing · 50% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
mirror detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Video Mirror Detection with the Motion-in-Depth Cue · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation › 3d motion estimation
motion-in-depth |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Video Mirror Detection with the Motion-in-Depth Cue · AAAI 2026 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › dynamic scene analysis › video scene understanding
video mirror detection |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Video Mirror Detection with the Motion-in-Depth Cue · AAAI 2026 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Effective Video Mirror Detection with Inconsistent Motion Cues · CVPR 2024 |
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › video analysis
video mirror detection |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Effective Video Mirror Detection with Inconsistent Motion Cues · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Effective Video Mirror Detection with Inconsistent Motion Cues · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
optical flow · 1.5motion attention · 1.5edge detection · 1.5transformer · 1.0cross-modal attention · 1.0contrastive learning · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Video Mirror Detection with the Motion-in-Depth CueabstractDetecting mirror regions in RGB videos is essential for scene understanding in applications such as scene reconstruction and robotic navigation. Existing video mirror detectors typically rely on cues like inside-outside mirror correspondences and 2D motion inconsistencies. However, these methods often yield noisy or incomplete predictions when confronted with complex real-world video scenes, especially in areas with occlusion or limited visual features and motions. We observe that human perceive and navigate 3D occluded environments with remarkable ease, owing to Motion-in-Depth (MiD) perception. MiD integrates information from visual appearance (image colors and textures), the way objects move around us in 3D space (3D motions), and their relative distance from us (depth) to determine if something is approaching or receding and to support navigation. Motivated by this neuroscience mechanism, we introduce MiD-VMD, the first approach to explicitly model MiD for video mirror detection. MiD-VMD jointly utilizes contrastive 3D motion, depth, and image features through two novel modules based on a combinational QKV transformer architecture. The Motion-in-Depth Attention Learning (MiD-AL) module captures complementary relationships across these modalities with combinatorial attention and enforces a compact encoding to represent global 3D transformations, resulting in more accurate mirror detection and reduced motion artifacts. The Motion-in-Depth Boundary Detection (MiD-BD) module further sharpens mirror boundaries by leveraging cross-modal attention on 3D motion and depth features. Extensive experiments show that MiD-VMD outperforms current SOTAs. Alex Warren, Ke Xu 0010, Xin Tian 0015, Gary K. L. Tam, Benjamin W. Wah, Rynson W. H. Lau |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Effective Video Mirror Detection with Inconsistent Motion CuesabstractImage-based mirror detection has recently undergone rapid research due to its significance in applications such as robotic navigation, semantic segmentation and scene re-construction. Recently, VMD-Net was proposed as the first video mirror detection technique, by modeling dual correspondences between the inside and outside of the mirror both spatially and temporally. However, this approach is not reliable, as correspondences can occur completely inside or outside of the mirrors. In addition, the proposed dataset VMD-D contains many small mirrors, limiting its applicability to real-world scenarios. To address these problems, we developed a more challenging dataset that includes mirrors of various shapes and sizes at different locations of the frames, providing a better reflection of real-world scenarios. Next, we observed that the motions between the inside and outside of the mirror are often in-consistent. For instance, when moving in front of a mirror, the motion inside the mirror is often much smaller than the motion outside due to increased depth perception. With these observations, we propose modeling inconsistent motion cues to detect mirrors, and a new network with two novel modules. The Motion Attention Module (MAM) ex-plicitly models inconsistent motions around mirrors via optical flow, and the Motion-Guided Edge Detection Module (MEDM) uses motions to guide mirror edge feature learning. Experimental results on our proposed dataset show that our method outperforms state-of-the-arts. The code and dataset are available at ht tps: // gi th ub. com/ AlexAnthonyWarren/MG-VMD. Alex Warren, Ke Xu 0010, Jiaying Lin 0001, Gary K. L. Tam, Rynson W. H. Lau |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2013 | Generating a ROS/JAUS bridge for an autonomous ground vehicleabstractRobotic systems have benefitted from standardized middleware that can componentize the development of new capabilities for a robot. The popularity of these robotic middleware systems has resulted in sizable libraries of components that are now available to roboti- cists. However, many robotic systems (such as autonomous vehicles) must adhere to externally defined standards that do not contain a large repository of components. Due to the real-time and safety concerns that accompany the domain of unmanned systems, it is not trivial to interface these middleware systems. However, previous attempts to do so have succeeded at the cost of ad hoc design and implementation. This paper describes a domain-specific approach to the synthesis of a bridge between the popular Robotic Operating System (ROS) and the Joint Architecture for Unmanned Systems (JAUS). The domain-specific nature of the approach permits the bridge to be limited in scope by the application's specific messages (and their attribute mappings between JAUS/ROS), resulting in smaller code size and overhead than would be incurred by a generic solution. Our approach is validated by tests performed on an unmanned vehicle with and without the JAUS/ROS bridge. Patrick Morley, Alex Warren, Ethan Rabb, Sean Whitsitt, Matt Bunting, Jonathan Sprinkle |
DSM@SPLASH | 2 |