Federico Pintore

dblp:183/6283 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7985-3131ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 8 · 6 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 New Straight-Line Extractable NIZKPs for Cryptographic Group Actions
Andrea Flamini, Federico Pintore, Edoardo Signorini, Giovanni Tognolini
CRYPTO (4)2
2026 Recursion Enabled: Improved Cryptanalysis of the Permuted Kernel Problem
Alessandro Budroni, Marco Defranceschi, Federico Pintore
PQCrypto (2)3
2025 Security of fixed-weight repetitions of special-sound multi-round interactive proofs
Michele Battagliola, Riccardo Longo, Federico Pintore, Edoardo Signorini, Giovanni Tognolini
Des. Codes Cryptogr.3
2025 A Guide to the Design of Digital Signatures based on Cryptographic Group Actions
Giacomo Borin, Edoardo Persichetti, Federico Pintore, Krijn Reijnders, Paolo Santini
J. Cryptol.3
2023 Group signatures and more from isogenies and lattices: generic, simple, and efficient
abstract
Abstract We construct an efficient dynamic group signature (or more generally an accountable ring signature) from isogeny and lattice assumptions. Our group signature is based on a simple generic construction that can be instantiated by cryptographically hard group actions such as the CSIDH group action or an MLWE-based group action. The signature is of size $$O(\log N)$$ O ( log N ) , where N is the number of users in the group. Our idea builds on the recent efficient OR-proof by Beullens, Katsumata, and Pintore (Asiacrypt’20), where we efficiently add a proof of valid ciphertext to their OR-proof and further show that the resulting non-interactive zero-knowledge proof system is online extractable . Our group signatures satisfy more ideal security properties compared to previously known constructions, while simultaneously having an attractive signature size. The signature size of our isogeny-based construction is an order of magnitude smaller than all previously known post-quantum group signatures (e.g., 6.6 KB for 64 members). In comparison, our lattice-based construction has a larger signature size (e.g., either 126 KB or 89 KB for 64 members depending on the satisfied security property). However, since the $$O(\cdot )$$ O ( · ) -notation hides a very small constant factor, it remains small even for very large group sizes, say $$2^{20}$$ 2 20 .
Ward Beullens, Samuel Dobson, Shuichi Katsumata, Yi-Fu Lai, Federico Pintore
Des. Codes Cryptogr.5
2022 Group Signatures and More from Isogenies and Lattices: Generic, Simple, and Efficient
Ward Beullens, Samuel Dobson, Shuichi Katsumata, Yi-Fu Lai, Federico Pintore
EUROCRYPT (2)5
2020 Calamari and Falafl: Logarithmic (Linkable) Ring Signatures from Isogenies and Lattices
Ward Beullens, Shuichi Katsumata, Federico Pintore
ASIACRYPT (2)3
2020 Scalable Ciphertext Compression Techniques for Post-quantum KEMs and Their Applications
Shuichi Katsumata, Kris Kwiatkowski, Federico Pintore, Thomas Prest
ASIACRYPT (1)3