VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Federico Pintore
dblp:183/6283
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
0as first author
6since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7985-3131ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 8 · 6 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | New Straight-Line Extractable NIZKPs for Cryptographic Group Actions
Andrea Flamini, Federico Pintore, Edoardo Signorini, Giovanni Tognolini |
CRYPTO (4) | 2 |
| 2026 | Recursion Enabled: Improved Cryptanalysis of the Permuted Kernel Problem
Alessandro Budroni, Marco Defranceschi, Federico Pintore |
PQCrypto (2) | 3 |
| 2025 | Security of fixed-weight repetitions of special-sound multi-round interactive proofs
Michele Battagliola, Riccardo Longo, Federico Pintore, Edoardo Signorini, Giovanni Tognolini |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 3 |
| 2025 | A Guide to the Design of Digital Signatures based on Cryptographic Group Actions
Giacomo Borin, Edoardo Persichetti, Federico Pintore, Krijn Reijnders, Paolo Santini |
J. Cryptol. | 3 |
| 2023 | Group signatures and more from isogenies and lattices: generic, simple, and efficientabstractAbstract We construct an efficient dynamic group signature (or more generally an accountable ring signature) from isogeny and lattice assumptions. Our group signature is based on a simple generic construction that can be instantiated by cryptographically hard group actions such as the CSIDH group action or an MLWE-based group action. The signature is of size $$O(\log N)$$ O ( log N ) , where N is the number of users in the group. Our idea builds on the recent efficient OR-proof by Beullens, Katsumata, and Pintore (Asiacrypt’20), where we efficiently add a proof of valid ciphertext to their OR-proof and further show that the resulting non-interactive zero-knowledge proof system is online extractable . Our group signatures satisfy more ideal security properties compared to previously known constructions, while simultaneously having an attractive signature size. The signature size of our isogeny-based construction is an order of magnitude smaller than all previously known post-quantum group signatures (e.g., 6.6 KB for 64 members). In comparison, our lattice-based construction has a larger signature size (e.g., either 126 KB or 89 KB for 64 members depending on the satisfied security property). However, since the $$O(\cdot )$$ O ( · ) -notation hides a very small constant factor, it remains small even for very large group sizes, say $$2^{20}$$ 2 20 . Ward Beullens, Samuel Dobson, Shuichi Katsumata, Yi-Fu Lai, Federico Pintore |
Des. Codes Cryptogr. | 5 |
| 2022 | Group Signatures and More from Isogenies and Lattices: Generic, Simple, and Efficient
Ward Beullens, Samuel Dobson, Shuichi Katsumata, Yi-Fu Lai, Federico Pintore |
EUROCRYPT (2) | 5 |
| 2020 | Calamari and Falafl: Logarithmic (Linkable) Ring Signatures from Isogenies and Lattices
Ward Beullens, Shuichi Katsumata, Federico Pintore |
ASIACRYPT (2) | 3 |
| 2020 | Scalable Ciphertext Compression Techniques for Post-quantum KEMs and Their Applications
Shuichi Katsumata, Kris Kwiatkowski, Federico Pintore, Thomas Prest |
ASIACRYPT (1) | 3 |