Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Aleksandar Botev
dblp:183/6489
· DBLP profile ↗
11ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-9021-1124ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 11 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 24% Generative modeling · 11% |
Topics — the 17 heaviest of 21, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › approximate bayesian inference
laplace approximation |
0.7 | 2 | 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › attention mechanism
self-attention |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Transformers without Shortcuts: Modifying Self-attention for Faithful Signal Propagation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Deep Transformers without Shortcuts: Modifying Self-attention for Faithful Signal Propagation · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
latent dynamics learning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | SyMetric: Measuring the Quality of Learnt Hamiltonian Dynamics Inferred from Vision · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Time series and sequential data
dynamical system learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hamiltonian Generative Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hamiltonian Generative Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › dynamical system
hamiltonian dynamics |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Hamiltonian Generative Networks · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
manifold learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model › efficient diffusion model
subspace diffusion model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Disentangling by Subspace Diffusion · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models
bayesian deep learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory
neural network analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
second-order optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › recursive bayesian estimation
bayesian online learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic Forgetting · NeurIPS 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-attention modification · 0.7laplace approximation · 0.7symplecticity metric · 0.5hamiltonian generative network · 0.5neural network · 0.4lie group theory · 0.4hamiltonian mechanics · 0.4diffusion · 0.4de rham decomposition · 0.4kronecker-factored approximation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Deep Transformers without Shortcuts: Modifying Self-attention for Faithful Signal Propagation
Bobby He, James Martens, Aleksandar Botev, Andrew Brock, Samuel L. Smith, Yee Whye Teh |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | Deep Learning without Shortcuts: Shaping the Kernel with Tailored Rectifiers
Aleksandar Botev, James Martens |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2021 | SyMetric: Measuring the Quality of Learnt Hamiltonian Dynamics Inferred from VisionabstractA recently proposed class of models attempts to learn latent dynamics from high-dimensional observations, like images, using priors informed by Hamiltonian mechanics. While these models have important potential applications in areas like robotics or autonomous driving, there is currently no good way to evaluate their performance: existing methods primarily rely on image reconstruction quality, which does not always reflect the quality of the learnt latent dynamics. In this work, we empirically highlight the problems with the existing measures and develop a set of new measures, including a binary indicator of whether the underlying Hamiltonian dynamics have been faithfully captured, which we call Symplecticity Metric or SyMetric. Our measures take advantage of the known properties of Hamiltonian dynamics and are more discriminative of the model's ability to capture the underlying dynamics than reconstruction error. Using SyMetric, we identify a set of architectural choices that significantly improve the performance of a previously proposed model for inferring latent dynamics from pixels, the Hamiltonian Generative Network (HGN). Unlike the original HGN, the new SyMetric is able to discover an interpretable phase space with physically meaningful latents on some datasets. Furthermore, it is stable for significantly longer rollouts on a diverse range of 13 datasets, producing rollouts of essentially infinite length both forward and backwards in time with no degradation in quality on a subset of the datasets. Irina Higgins, Peter Wirnsberger, Andrew Jaegle, Aleksandar Botev |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Hamiltonian Generative Networks
Peter Toth, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Andrew Jaegle, Sébastien Racanière, Aleksandar Botev, Irina Higgins |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2020 | Disentangling by Subspace DiffusionabstractWe present a novel nonparametric algorithm for symmetry-based disentangling of data manifolds, the Geometric Manifold Component Estimator (GEOMANCER). GEOMANCER provides a partial answer to the question posed by Higgins et al.(2018): is it possible to learn how to factorize a Lie group solely from observations of the orbit of an object it acts on? We show that fully unsupervised factorization of a data manifold is possible if the true metric of the manifold is known and each factor manifold has nontrivial holonomy – for example, rotation in 3D. Our algorithm works by estimating the subspaces that are invariant under random walk diffusion, giving an approximation to the de Rham decomposition from differential geometry. We demonstrate the efficacy of GEOMANCER on several complex synthetic manifolds. Our work reduces the question of whether unsupervised disentangling is possible to the question of whether unsupervised metric learning is possible, providing a unifying insight into the geometric nature of representation learning. David Pfau, Irina Higgins, Aleksandar Botev, Sébastien Racanière |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2018 | A Scalable Laplace Approximation for Neural Networks
Hippolyt Ritter, Aleksandar Botev, David Barber |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2018 | Online Structured Laplace Approximations for Overcoming Catastrophic ForgettingabstractWe introduce the Kronecker factored online Laplace approximation for overcoming catastrophic forgetting in neural networks. The method is grounded in a Bayesian online learning framework, where we recursively approximate the posterior after every task with a Gaussian, leading to a quadratic penalty on changes to the weights. The Laplace approximation requires calculating the Hessian around a mode, which is typically intractable for modern architectures. In order to make our method scalable, we leverage recent block-diagonal Kronecker factored approximations to the curvature. Our algorithm achieves over 90% test accuracy across a sequence of 50 instantiations of the permuted MNIST dataset, substantially outperforming related methods for overcoming catastrophic forgetting. Hippolyt Ritter, Aleksandar Botev, David Barber |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2017 | Complementary Sum Sampling for Likelihood Approximation in Large Scale ClassificationabstractWe consider training probabilistic classifiers in the case that the number of classes is too large to perform exact normalisation over all classes. We show that the source of high variance in standard sampling approximations is due to simply not including the correct class of the datapoint into the approximation. To account for this we explicitly sum over a subset of classes and sample the remaining. We show that this simple approach is competitive with recently introduced non likelihood-based approximations. Aleksandar Botev, Bowen Zheng 0004, David Barber |
AISTATS | 1 |
| 2017 | Practical Gauss-Newton Optimisation for Deep LearningabstractWe present an efficient block-diagonal approximation to the Gauss-Newton matrix for feedforward neural networks. Our resulting algorithm is competitive against state-of-the-art first-order optimisation methods, with sometimes significant improvement in optimisation performance. Unlike first-order methods, for which hyperparameter tuning of the optimisation parameters is often a laborious process, our approach can provide good performance even when used with default settings. A side result of our work is that for piecewise linear transfer functions, the network objective function can have no differentiable local maxima, which may partially explain why such transfer functions facilitate effective optimisation. Aleksandar Botev, Hippolyt Ritter, David Barber |
ICML | 1 |
| 2017 | Nesterov's accelerated gradient and momentum as approximations to regularised update descentabstractWe present a unifying framework for adapting the update direction in gradient-based iterative optimization methods. As natural special cases we re-derive classical momentum and Nesterov's accelerated gradient method, lending a new intuitive interpretation to the latter algorithm. We show that a new algorithm, which we term Regularised Gradient Descent, can converge more quickly than either Nesterov's algorithm or the classical momentum algorithm. Aleksandar Botev, Guy Lever, David Barber |
IJCNN | 1 |
| 2017 | Overdispersed variational autoencodersabstractThe ability to fit complex generative probabilistic models to data is a key challenge in AI. Currently, variational methods are popular, but remain difficult to train due to high variance of the sampling methods employed. We introduce the overdispersed variational autoencoder and overdispersed importance weighted autoencoder, which combine overdispersed black box variational inference with the variational autoencoder and importance weighted autoencoder respectively. We use the log likelihood lower bounds and reparametrisation trick from the variational and importance weighted autoencoders, but rather than drawing samples from the variational distribution itself, we use importance sampling to draw samples from an overdispersed (i.e. heavier-tailed) proposal in the same family as the variational distribution. We run experiments on two different datasets, and show that this technique produces a lower variance estimate of the gradients, and reaches a higher bound on the log likelihood of the observed data. Harshil Shah, David Barber, Aleksandar Botev |
IJCNN | 3 |