Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jean-Marc Langlois

dblp:184/0012 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 86% Query processing and optimization · 14%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 100%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › text classification
email classification
0.612022
Classifying Emails into Human vs Machine Category · AAAI 2022
Information retrieval › ranking › context-aware ranking
location-based ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Query processing and optimization
query rewriting
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval
ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › ranking › context-aware ranking
recency ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval › ranking › search ranking
relevance ranking
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval
retrieval models
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Information retrieval
search engines
0.212016
Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search · KDD 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification
0.212022
Classifying Emails into Human vs Machine Category · AAAI 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

CNN · 0.6BERT · 0.6semantic matching · 0.2query rewriting · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Precision/Recall on Imbalanced Test Data
abstract
In this paper we study the problem of estimating accurately the precision and recall for binary classification when the classes are imbalanced and only a limited number of human labels are available. One common strategy is to over-sample the small positive class predicted by the classifier. Rather than random sampling where the values in a confusion matrix are observations coming from a multinomial distribution, we over-sample the minority positive class predicted by the classifier, resulting in two independent binomial distributions. But how much should we over-sample? And what confidence/credible intervals can we deduce based on our over-sampling? We provide formulas for (1) the confidence intervals of the adjusted precision/recall after over-sampling; (2) Bayesian credible intervals of adjusted precision/recall. For precision, the higher the over-sampling rate, the narrower the confidence/credible interval. For recall, there exists an optimal over-sampling ratio, which minimizes the width of the confidence/credible interval. Also, we present experiments on synthetic data and real data to demonstrate the capability of our method to construct accurate intervals. Finally, we demonstrate how we can apply our techniques to Yahoo mail’s quality monitoring system.
Hongwei Shang 0001, Jean-Marc Langlois, Kostas Tsioutsiouliklis, Changsung Kang
AISTATS2
2022 Classifying Emails into Human vs Machine Category
abstract
It is an essential product requirement of Yahoo Mail to distinguish between personal and machine-generated emails. The old production classifier in Yahoo Mail was based on a simple logistic regression model. That model was trained by aggregating features at the SMTP address level. We propose building deep learning models at the message level. We train four individual CNN models: (1) a content model with subject and content as input, (2) a sender model with sender email address and name as input, (3) an action model by analyzing email recipients’ action patterns and generating target labels based on senders’ opening/deleting behaviors and (4) a salutation model by utilizing senders’ "explicit salutation" signal as positive labels. Next, we train a final full model after exploring different combinations of the above four models. Experimental results on editorial data show that our full model improves the adjusted-recall from 70.5% to 78.8% and the precision from 94.7% to 96.0% compared to the old production model. Also, our full model significantly outperforms a state-of-the-art BERT model at this task. Our new model has been deployed to the current production system (Yahoo Mail 6).
Changsung Kang, Hongwei Shang 0001, Jean-Marc Langlois
AAAI3
2016 Ranking Relevance in Yahoo Search
abstract
Search engines play a crucial role in our daily lives. Relevance is the core problem of a commercial search engine. It has attracted thousands of researchers from both academia and industry and has been studied for decades. Relevance in a modern search engine has gone far beyond text matching, and now involves tremendous challenges. The semantic gap between queries and URLs is the main barrier for improving base relevance. Clicks help provide hints to improve relevance, but unfortunately for most tail queries, the click information is too sparse, noisy, or missing entirely. For comprehensive relevance, the recency and location sensitivity of results is also critical. In this paper, we give an overview of the solutions for relevance in the Yahoo search engine. We introduce three key techniques for base relevance -- ranking functions, semantic matching features and query rewriting. We also describe solutions for recency sensitive relevance and location sensitive relevance. This work builds upon 20 years of existing efforts on Yahoo search, summarizes the most recent advances and provides a series of practical relevance solutions. The performance reported is based on Yahoo's commercial search engine, where tens of billions of urls are indexed and served by the ranking system.
Dawei Yin 0001, Yuening Hu, Jiliang Tang, Tim Daly Jr., Mianwei Zhou, Hua Ouyang, Changsung Kang, Hongbo Deng, Chikashi Nobata, Jean-Marc Langlois, Yi Chang 0001
KDD11