Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ali Vanderveld

dblp:184/0031 · also R. Ali Vanderveld · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Machine learning and data management · 36% Data mining · 36% Recommender systems · 28%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Smart cities and intelligent transportation · 77% Medical and health informatics · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning and data management
predictive maintenance
0.312018
Using Machine Learning to Assess the Risk of and Prevent Water Main Breaks · KDD 2018
Recommender systems › user modeling
customer lifetime value prediction
0.212016
An Engagement-Based Customer Lifetime Value System for E-commerce · KDD 2016
Data mining
predictive modeling
0.212016
An Engagement-Based Customer Lifetime Value System for E-commerce · KDD 2016
Data mining › behavior modeling
customer behavior modeling
0.112016
An Engagement-Based Customer Lifetime Value System for E-commerce · KDD 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning · 0.7gradient-boosted decision tree · 0.3gradient boosted decision trees · 0.3random forest · 0.2feature engineering · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Using Machine Learning to Assess the Risk of and Prevent Water Main Breaks
abstract
Water infrastructure in the United States is beginning to show its age, particularly through water main breaks. Main breaks cause major disruptions in everyday life for residents and businesses. Water main failures in Syracuse, N.Y. (as in most cities) are handled reactively rather than proactively. A barrier to proactive maintenance with limited resources is the city's inability to properly prioritize the allocation of its resources. We built a Machine Learning system to assess the risk of a water mains breaking. Using historical data on which mains have failed, descriptors of pipes, and other data sources, we evaluated several models' abilities to predict breaks three years into the future. Our results show that our system using gradient boosted decision trees performed best out of several algorithms and expert heuristics, achieving precision at 1% ([email protected]) of 0.62. Our model outperforms a random baseline ([email protected] of 0.08) and expert heuristics such as water main age ([email protected] of 0.10) and history of past main breaks ([email protected] of 0.48). The model is currently deployed in the City of Syracuse. We are conducting a pilot by calculating the risk of failure for each city block over the period 2016-2018 using data up to the end of 2015 and, as of the end of 2017, there have been 42 breaks on our riskiest 52 mains. This has been a successful initiative for the city of Syracuse in improving its infrastructure and we believe this approach can be applied to other cities.
Avishek Kumar, Syed Ali Asad Rizvi, Benjamin Brooks, Ali Vanderveld, Kevin H. Wilson, Chad Kenney, Sam Edelstein, Adria Finch, Andrew Maxwell, Joe Zuckerbraun, Rayid Ghani
KDD4
2016 An Engagement-Based Customer Lifetime Value System for E-commerce
abstract
A comprehensive understanding of individual customer value is crucial to any successful customer relationship management strategy. It is also the key to building products for long-term value returns. Modeling customer lifetime value (CLTV) can be fraught with technical difficulties, however, due to both the noisy nature of user-level behavior and the potentially large customer base. Here we describe a new CLTV system that solves these problems. This was built at Groupon, a large global e-commerce company, where confronting the unique challenges of local commerce means quickly iterating on new products and the optimal inventory to appeal to a wide and diverse audience. Given current purchaser frequency we need a faster way to determine the health of individual customers, and given finite resources we need to know where to focus our energy. Our CLTV system predicts future value on an individual user basis with a random forest model which includes features that account for nearly all aspects of each customer's relationship with our platform. This feature set includes those quantifying engagement via email and our mobile app, which give us the ability to predict changes in value far more quickly than models based solely on purchase behavior. We further model different customer types, such as one-time buyers and power users, separately so as to allow for different feature weights and to enhance the interpretability of our results. Additionally, we developed an economical scoring framework wherein we re-score a user when any trigger events occur and apply a decay function otherwise, to enable frequent scoring of a large customer base with a complex model. This system is deployed, predicting the value of hundreds of millions of users on a daily cadence, and is actively being used across our products and business initiatives.
Ali Vanderveld, Addhyan Pandey, Angela Han, Rajesh Parekh
KDD1