Newly-formed teams often encounter the challenge of members coming together to collaborate on a project without prior knowledge of each other's working and communication styles. This lack of familiarity can lead to conflicts and misunderstandings, hindering effective teamwork. Derived from research in social recommender systems, team recommender systems have shown the ability to address this challenge by providing personality- derived recommendations that help individuals interact with teammates with differing personalities. However, such an approach raises privacy concerns as to whether teammates would be willing to disclose such personal information with their team. Using a vignette survey conducted via a research platform that hosts a team recommender system, this study found that context and individual differences significantly impact disclosure preferences related to team recommender systems. Specifically, when working in interdependent teams where success required collective performance, participants were more likely to disclose personality information related to Emotionality and Extraversion unconditionally. Drawing on these findings, this study created and evaluated a machine learning model to predict disclosure preferences based on group context and individual differences, which can help tailor privacy considerations in team recommender systems prior to interaction.

Abstract Social choice aggregation strategies have been proposed as an explainable way to generate recommendations to groups of users. However, it is not trivial to determine the best strategy to apply for a specific group. Previous work highlighted that the performance of a group recommender system is affected by the internal diversity of the group members’ preferences. However, few of them have empirically evaluated how the specific distribution of preferences in a group determines which strategy is the most effective. Furthermore, only a few studies evaluated the impact of providing explanations for the recommendations generated with social choice aggregation strategies, by evaluating explanations and aggregation strategies in a coupled way. To fill these gaps, we present two user studies (N=399 and N=288) examining the effectiveness of social choice aggregation strategies in terms of users’ fairness perception, consensus perception, and satisfaction. We study the impact of the level of (dis-)agreement within the group on the performance of these strategies. Furthermore, we investigate the added value of textual explanations of the underlying social choice aggregation strategy used to generate the recommendation. The results of both user studies show no benefits in using social choice-based explanations for group recommendations. However, we find significant differences in the effectiveness of the social choice-based aggregation strategies in both studies. Furthermore, the specific group configuration (i.e., various scenarios of internal diversity) seems to determine the most effective aggregation strategy. These results provide useful insights on how to select the appropriate aggregation strategy for a specific group based on the level of (dis-)agreement within the group members’ preferences.

Abstract When deciding where to visit next while traveling in a group, people have to make a trade-off in an interactive group recommender system between (a) disclosing their personal information to explain and support their arguments about what places to visit or to avoid (e.g., this place is too expensive for my budget) and (b) protecting their privacy by not disclosing too much. Arguably, this trade-off crucially depends on who the other group members are and how cooperative one aims to be in making the decision. This paper studies how an individual’s personality, trust in group, and general privacy concern as well as their preference scenario and the task design serve as antecedents to their trade-off between disclosure benefit and privacy risk when disclosing their personal information (e.g., their current location, financial information, etc.) in a group recommendation explanation. We aim to design a model which helps us understand the relationship between risk and benefit and their moderating factors on final information disclosure in the group. To create realistic scenarios of group decision making where users can control the amount of information disclosed, we developed . This chat-bot agent generates natural language explanations to help group members explain their arguments for suggestions to the group in the tourism domain [more specifically, the initial POI options were selected from the category of “Food” in Amsterdam (see Sect. 3.2 for the details)]. To understand the dynamics between the factors mentioned above and information disclosure, we conducted an online, between-subjects user experiment that involved 278 participants who were exposed to either a competitive task (i.e., instructed to convince the group to visit or skip a recommended place) or a cooperative task (i.e., instructed to reach a decision in the group). Results show that participants’ personality and whether their preferences align with the majority affect their general privacy concern perception. This, in turn, affects their trust in the group, which affects their perception of privacy risk and disclosure benefit when disclosing personal information in the group, which ultimately influences the amount of personal information they disclose. A surprising finding was that the effect of privacy risk on information disclosure is different for different types of tasks: privacy risk significantly impacts information disclosure when the task of finding a suitable destination is framed competitively but not when it is framed cooperatively. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the moderating factors of information disclosure in group decision making and shed new light on the role of task design on information disclosure. We conclude with design recommendations for developing explanations in group decision-making systems. Further, we propose a theory of user modeling that shows what factors need to be considered when generating such group explanations automatically.

Explanations can help users to better understand why items have been recommended. Additionally, explanations for group recommender systems need to consider further goals than single-user recommender systems. For example, we need to balance group members’ need for privacy with their need for transparency, since a transparent explanation might pose a privacy hazard. In an online experiment with real groups (n=114 participants: 38 groups of size 3), we seek to understand which factors influence people’s privacy concerns when a single explanation is presented to a group in the tourism domain. In particular, we study the direct effects of three factors on privacy concern: a) group members’ personality (using the ‘Big Five’ personality traits), b) specific preference scenarios (i.e., having minority or majority preferences compared to two other group members), c) the type of relationship they have in the group (i.e., loosely coupled heterogeneous, versus tightly coupled homogeneous). We find that for personality two traits, Extroversion, and Agreeableness, each significantly affects the privacy concern. Moreover, having the minority or majority preferences in the group, as well as the type of relationship people have in the group, have a strong and significant influence on participants’ privacy concern. These results suggest that explanations presented to groups need to be adapted to all three factors (personality, type of relationship, and preference scenario) when considering the privacy concern of users.