Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Amir Khodabandeh

dblp:184/4621 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-5051-8233ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Generative modeling · 46% 3D vision · 46% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 7%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
SG-LDM: Semantic-Guided LiDAR Generation via Latent-Aligned Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model
0.912025
SG-LDM: Semantic-Guided LiDAR Generation via Latent-Aligned Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d generation › point cloud generation
LiDAR point cloud generation
0.912025
SG-LDM: Semantic-Guided LiDAR Generation via Latent-Aligned Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d generation
point cloud generation
0.912025
SG-LDM: Semantic-Guided LiDAR Generation via Latent-Aligned Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation
0.312025
SG-LDM: Semantic-Guided LiDAR Generation via Latent-Aligned Diffusion · ICCV 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

semantic conditioning · 0.9diffusion model · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 SG-LDM: Semantic-Guided LiDAR Generation via Latent-Aligned Diffusion
abstract
Lidar point cloud synthesis based on generative models offers a promising solution to augment deep learning pipelines, particularly when real-world data is scarce or lacks diversity. By enabling flexible object manipulation, this synthesis approach can significantly enrich training datasets and enhance discriminative models. However, existing methods focus on unconditional lidar point cloud generation, overlooking their potential for real-world applications. In this paper, we propose SG-LDM, a Semantic-Guided Lidar Diffusion Model that employs latent alignment to enable robust semantic-to-lidar synthesis. By directly operating in the native lidar space and leveraging explicit semantic conditioning, SG-LDM achieves state-of-the-art performance in generating high-fidelity lidar point clouds guided by semantic labels. Moreover, we propose the first diffusion-based lidar translation framework based on SG-LDM, which enables cross-domain translation as a domain adaptation strategy to enhance downstream perception performance. Systematic experiments demonstrate that SG-LDM significantly outperforms existing lidar diffusion models and the proposed lidar translation framework further improves data augmentation performance in the downstream lidar segmentation task.
Zhengkang Xiang, Zizhao Li, Amir Khodabandeh, Kourosh Khoshelham
ICCV3
2016 Array-Aided Multifrequency GNSS Ionospheric Sensing: Estimability and Precision Analysis
abstract
The dual-frequency Global Positioning System has proven to be an effective means of measuring the Earth's ionosphere and its total electron content (TEC). With the advent of multifrequency signals from more Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs), the opportunity arises to construct many more ionosphere-sensing combinations of GNSS data. With such diversity, various estimable ionospheric delays with differing interpretations (and of different precision) can be formed. How such estimable ionospheric delays should be interpreted, and the extent to which they contribute to the precision with which the unbiased TEC can be estimated, are the topics of this paper. Based on multifrequency GNSS code-only, phase-only, and phase-and-code data, we derive the closed-form solutions of different types of ionospheric observables that each can serve as input of an externally provided ionospheric model for TEC determination. Within such a general least-squares framework, we generalize the widely used phase-to-code levelling technique to its multifrequency version. We also show that only certain specific linear combinations of the observables contribute to the TEC solutions. As a further improvement of the multifrequency GNSS-derived TEC solution, we propose and study the usage of an array of GNSS antennas. Analytical solutions, supported by numerical examples, of this array-based concept are presented, together with a discussion on its relevance for TEC determination. This concerns the roles of time averaging and time differencing, of integer ambiguity resolution, and of the number of frequencies and number of array antennas in determining TEC.
Amir Khodabandeh, Peter J. G. Teunissen
IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens.1