Simultaneous broadcast (SBC) protocols, introduced in [Chor et al., FOCS 1985], constitute a special class of broadcast channels which, besides consistency, guarantee that all senders broadcast their messages independently of the messages broadcast by other parties. SBC has proved extremely useful in the design of various distributed computing constructions (e.g., multiparty computation, coin flipping, electronic voting, fair bidding). As with any communication channel, it is crucial that SBC security is composable, i.e., it is preserved under concurrent protocol executions. The work of [Hevia, SCN 2006] proposes a formal treatment of SBC in the state-of-the-art Universal Composability (UC) framework [Canetti, FOCS 2001] and a construction secure assuming an honest majority.

Recent advances indicate that quantum computers will soon be reality. Motivated by this ever more realistic threat for existing classical cryptographic protocols, researchers have developed several schemes to resist "quantum attacks". In particular, for electronic voting, several e-voting schemes relying on properties of quantum mechanics have been proposed. However, each of these proposals comes with a different and often not well-articulated corruption model, has different objectives, and is accompanied by security claims which are never formalized and are at best justified only against specific attacks. To address this, we propose the first formal security definitions for quantum e-voting protocols. With these at hand, we systematize and evaluate the security of previously-proposed quantum e-voting protocols; we examine the claims of these works concerning privacy, correctness and verifiability, and if they are correctly attributed to the proposed protocols. In all non-trivial cases, we identify specific quantum attacks that violate these properties. We argue that the cause of these failures lies in the absence of formal security models and references to the existing cryptographic literature.