Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Robert Guthrie

dblp:185/0579 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 64% Language models and text generation · 17% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding
0.522017
Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017
Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings · EMNLP 2016
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
character embedding
0.312017
Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
out-of-vocabulary word embedding
0.312017
Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
subword modeling
0.312017
Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model
0.212016
Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging
0.112016
Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

subword RNN · 0.3probabilistic framework · 0.2morphological priors · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs
abstract
Word embeddings improve generalization over lexical features by placing each word in a lower-dimensional space, using distributional information obtained from unlabeled data.However, the effectiveness of word embeddings for downstream NLP tasks is limited by out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words, for which embeddings do not exist.In this paper, we present MIM-ICK, an approach to generating OOV word embeddings compositionally, by learning a function from spellings to distributional embeddings.Unlike prior work, MIMICK does not require re-training on the original word embedding corpus; instead, learning is performed at the type level.Intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations demonstrate the power of this simple approach.On 23 languages, MIMICK improves performance over a word-based baseline for tagging part-of-speech and morphosyntactic attributes.It is competitive with (and complementary to) a supervised characterbased model in low-resource settings.
Yuval Pinter, Robert Guthrie, Jacob Eisenstein
EMNLP2
2016 Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings
abstract
Word embeddings allow natural language processing systems to share statistical information across related words.These embeddings are typically based on distributional statistics, making it difficult for them to generalize to rare or unseen words.We propose to improve word embeddings by incorporating morphological information, capturing shared sub-word features.Unlike previous work that constructs word embeddings directly from morphemes, we combine morphological and distributional information in a unified probabilistic framework, in which the word embedding is a latent variable.The morphological information provides a prior distribution on the latent word embeddings, which in turn condition a likelihood function over an observed corpus.This approach yields improvements on intrinsic word similarity evaluations, and also in the downstream task of part-of-speech tagging.
Parminder Bhatia, Robert Guthrie, Jacob Eisenstein
EMNLP2