Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert Guthrie
dblp:185/0579
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 64% Language models and text generation · 17% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation
word embedding |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017 Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings · EMNLP 2016 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › text embedding
character embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › word representation › word embedding
out-of-vocabulary word embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › tokenization
subword modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNs · EMNLP 2017 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word Embeddings · EMNLP 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
subword RNN · 0.3probabilistic framework · 0.2morphological priors · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Mimicking Word Embeddings using Subword RNNsabstractWord embeddings improve generalization over lexical features by placing each word in a lower-dimensional space, using distributional information obtained from unlabeled data.However, the effectiveness of word embeddings for downstream NLP tasks is limited by out-of-vocabulary (OOV) words, for which embeddings do not exist.In this paper, we present MIM-ICK, an approach to generating OOV word embeddings compositionally, by learning a function from spellings to distributional embeddings.Unlike prior work, MIMICK does not require re-training on the original word embedding corpus; instead, learning is performed at the type level.Intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations demonstrate the power of this simple approach.On 23 languages, MIMICK improves performance over a word-based baseline for tagging part-of-speech and morphosyntactic attributes.It is competitive with (and complementary to) a supervised characterbased model in low-resource settings. Yuval Pinter, Robert Guthrie, Jacob Eisenstein |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2016 | Morphological Priors for Probabilistic Neural Word EmbeddingsabstractWord embeddings allow natural language processing systems to share statistical information across related words.These embeddings are typically based on distributional statistics, making it difficult for them to generalize to rare or unseen words.We propose to improve word embeddings by incorporating morphological information, capturing shared sub-word features.Unlike previous work that constructs word embeddings directly from morphemes, we combine morphological and distributional information in a unified probabilistic framework, in which the word embedding is a latent variable.The morphological information provides a prior distribution on the latent word embeddings, which in turn condition a likelihood function over an observed corpus.This approach yields improvements on intrinsic word similarity evaluations, and also in the downstream task of part-of-speech tagging. Parminder Bhatia, Robert Guthrie, Jacob Eisenstein |
EMNLP | 2 |