VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexander L. Gaunt
dblp:185/1083 · also Alex Gaunt
· DBLP profile ↗
13ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6123-288XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Generative modeling · 35% Graph learning · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 16% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Storage systems · 79% Cloud and datacenter computing · 21% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
5 papers |
Program synthesis and code generation · 33% Compilers and program optimization · 19% Software maintenance and evolution · 19% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 26 heaviest of 29, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
archival storage |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · SOSP 2023 |
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage |
0.9 | 2 | 2025 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · SOSP 2023 Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Storage systems
digital preservation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Storage systems
storage reliability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · ACM Trans. Storage 2025 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.8 | 2 | 2024 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 Generative Hierarchical Materials Search · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
crystal structure generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Hierarchical Materials Search · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Hierarchical Materials Search · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Graph learning › molecular representation learning › molecular graph learning
molecular property prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
molecular property prediction |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generative Code Modeling with Graphs · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deterministic Variational Inference for Robust Bayesian Neural Networks · ICLR 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › model robustness
robust inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deterministic Variational Inference for Robust Bayesian Neural Networks · ICLR 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deterministic Variational Inference for Robust Bayesian Neural Networks · ICLR 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deterministic Variational Inference for Robust Bayesian Neural Networks · ICLR 2019 |
Compilers and program optimization
code generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Generative Code Modeling with Graphs · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Constrained Graph Variational Autoencoders for Molecule Design · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › molecular generation
molecular design |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Constrained Graph Variational Autoencoders for Molecule Design · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Constrained Graph Variational Autoencoders for Molecule Design · NeurIPS 2018 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural program synthesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Neural Program Lattices · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Programming languages and type systems › programming paradigms
differentiable programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Differentiable Programs with Neural Libraries · ICML 2017 |
Program synthesis and code generation
inductive program synthesis |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | DeepCoder: Learning to Write Programs · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Program analysis
program representation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Neural Program Lattices · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › supervised learning
property prediction |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Generative Hierarchical Materials Search · NeurIPS 2024 |
Storage systems › storage devices
storage media |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in Glass · SOSP 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
lifelong learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Differentiable Programs with Neural Libraries · ICML 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph neural network · 1.9workload analysis · 1.5regularization · 1.1hardware-software co-design · 0.9program graph representation · 0.8multi-objective optimization · 0.8forward tree search · 0.8co-design · 0.7neural program lattices · 0.6variational inference · 0.4representation learning · 0.4edit learning · 0.4deterministic approximation · 0.4latent space shaping · 0.3graph variational autoencoder · 0.3neural network · 0.3inductive program synthesis · 0.3gradient-based training · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in GlassabstractSustainable and cost-effective long-term storage remains an unsolved problem. The most widely used storage technologies today are magnetic (hard disk drives and tape). They use media that degrades over time and has a limited lifetime, which leads to inefficient, wasteful, and costly solutions for long-lived data. This article presents Silica: the first cloud storage system for archival data underpinned by quartz glass, an extremely resilient media that allows data to be left in situ indefinitely. The hardware and software of Silica have been co-designed and co-optimized from the media up to the service level with sustainability as a primary objective. The design follows a cloud-first, data-driven methodology underpinned by principles derived from analyzing the archival workload of a large public cloud service. Silica can support a wide range of archival storage workloads and ushers in a new era of sustainable, cost-effective storage. Patrick Anderson 0001, Erika Blancada Aranas, Youssef Assaf, Raphael Behrendt, Richard Black, Marco Caballero, Pashmina Cameron, Burcu Canakci, Andromachi Chatzieleftheriou, Rebekah Storan Clarke, James Clegg, Daniel Cletheroe, Bridgette Cooper, Thales De Carvalho, Tim Deegan, Austin Donnelly, Rokas Drevinskas, Alexander L. Gaunt, Christos Gkantsidis, Ariel Gomez Diaz, István Haller, Freddie Hong, Teodora Ilieva, Shashidhar Joshi, Russell Joyce, Mint Kunkel, David Lara Alabazares, Sergey Legtchenko, Fanglin Linda Liu, Bruno Magalhães, Alana Marzoev, Marvin McNett, Jayashree Mohan, Michael Myrah, Sebastian Nowozin, Aaron Ogus, Hiske Overweg, Antony I. T. Rowstron, Maneesh Sah, Masaaki Sakakura, Peter Scholtz, Nina Schreiner, Omer Sella, Ioan A. Stefanovici, David Sweeney, Benn C. Thomsen, Govert Verkes, Phil Wainman, Jonathan Westcott, Luke Weston, Charles Whittaker, Pablo Wilke Berenguer, Hugh Williams, Stefan Winzeck |
ACM Trans. Storage | 18 |
| 2024 | Generative Hierarchical Materials SearchabstractGenerative models trained at scale can now produce novel text, video, and more recently, scientific data such as crystal structures. The ultimate goal for materials discovery, however, goes beyond generation: we desire a fully automated system that proposes, generates, and verifies crystal structures given a high-level user instruction. In this work, we formulate end-to-end language-to-structure generation as a multi-objective optimization problem, and propose Generative Hierarchical Materials Search (GenMS) for controllable generation of crystal structures. GenMS consists of (1) a language model that takes high-level natural language as input and generates intermediate textual information about a crystal (e.g., chemical formulae), and (2) a diffusion model that takes intermediate information as input and generates low-level continuous value crystal structures. GenMS additionally uses a graph neural network to predict properties (e.g., formation energy) from the generated crystal structures. During inference, GenMS leverages all three components to conduct a forward tree search over the space of possible structures. Experiments show that GenMS outperforms other alternatives both in satisfying user request and in generating low-energy structures. GenMS is able to generate complex structures such as double perovskites (or elpasolites), layered structures, and spinels, solely from natural language input. Sherry Yang 0001, Simon L. Batzner, Ruiqi Gao, Muratahan Aykol, Alexander L. Gaunt, Brendan McMorrow, Danilo Jimenez Rezende, Dale Schuurmans, Igor Mordatch, Ekin Dogus Cubuk |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2023 | Project Silica: Towards Sustainable Cloud Archival Storage in GlassabstractSustainable and cost-effective long-term storage remains an unsolved problem. The most widely used storage technologies today are magnetic (hard disk drives and tape). They use media that degrades over time and has a limited lifetime, which leads to inefficient, wasteful, and costly solutions for long-lived data. This paper presents Silica: the first cloud storage system for archival data underpinned by quartz glass, an extremely resilient media that allows data to be left in situ indefinitely. The hardware and software of Silica have been co-designed and co-optimized from the media up to the service level with sustainability as a primary objective. The design follows a cloud-first, data-driven methodology underpinned by principles derived from analyzing the archival workload of a large public cloud service. Silica can support a wide range of archival storage workloads and ushers in a new era of sustainable, cost-effective storage. Patrick Anderson 0001, Erika Blancada Aranas, Youssef Assaf, Raphael Behrendt, Richard Black, Marco Caballero, Pashmina Cameron, Burcu Canakci, Thales De Carvalho, Andromachi Chatzieleftheriou, Rebekah Storan Clarke, James Clegg, Daniel Cletheroe, Bridgette Cooper, Tim Deegan, Austin Donnelly, Rokas Drevinskas, Alexander L. Gaunt, Christos Gkantsidis, Ariel Gomez Diaz, István Haller, Freddie Hong, Teodora Ilieva, Shashidhar Joshi, Russell Joyce, Mint Kunkel, David Lara Alabazares, Sergey Legtchenko, Fanglin Linda Liu, Bruno Magalhães, Alana Marzoev, Marvin McNett, Jayashree Mohan, Michael Myrah, Sebastian Nowozin, Aaron Ogus, Hiske Overweg, Antony I. T. Rowstron, Maneesh Sah, Masaaki Sakakura, Peter Scholtz, Nina Schreiner, Omer Sella, Ioan A. Stefanovici, David Sweeney, Benn C. Thomsen, Govert Verkes, Phil Wainman, Jonathan Westcott, Luke Weston, Charles Whittaker, Pablo Wilke Berenguer, Hugh Williams, Stefan Winzeck |
SOSP | 18 |
| 2022 | Simple GNN Regularisation for 3D Molecular Property Prediction and Beyond
Jonathan Godwin, Michael Schaarschmidt, Alexander L. Gaunt, Alvaro Sanchez-Gonzalez, Yulia Rubanova, Petar Velickovic, James Kirkpatrick, Peter W. Battaglia |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2019 | Generative Code Modeling with Graphs
Marc Brockschmidt, Miltiadis Allamanis, Alexander L. Gaunt, Oleksandr Polozov |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2019 | Deterministic Variational Inference for Robust Bayesian Neural Networks
Anqi Wu, Sebastian Nowozin, Edward Meeds, Richard E. Turner, José Miguel Hernández-Lobato, Alexander L. Gaunt |
ICLR | 6 |
| 2019 | Learning to Represent Edits
Graham Neubig, Miltiadis Allamanis, Marc Brockschmidt, Alexander L. Gaunt |
ICLR (Poster) | 5 |
| 2018 | Glass: A New Media for a New Era?
Patrick Anderson 0001, Richard Black, Ausra Cerkauskaite, Andromachi Chatzieleftheriou, James Clegg, Chris Dainty, Raluca Diaconu, Rokas Drevinskas, Austin Donnelly, Alexander L. Gaunt, Andreas Georgiou, Ariel Gomez Diaz, Peter G. Kazansky, David Lara Alabazares, Sergey Legtchenko, Sebastian Nowozin, Aaron Ogus, Douglas Phillips, Antony I. T. Rowstron, Masaaki Sakakura, Ioan A. Stefanovici, Benn C. Thomsen, Hugh Williams, Mengyang Yang |
HotStorage | 10 |
| 2018 | Constrained Graph Variational Autoencoders for Molecule DesignabstractGraphs are ubiquitous data structures for representing interactions between entities. With an emphasis on applications in chemistry, we explore the task of learning to generate graphs that conform to a distribution observed in training data. We propose a variational autoencoder model in which both encoder and decoder are graph-structured. Our decoder assumes a sequential ordering of graph extension steps and we discuss and analyze design choices that mitigate the potential downsides of this linearization. Experiments compare our approach with a wide range of baselines on the molecule generation task and show that our method is successful at matching the statistics of the original dataset on semantically important metrics. Furthermore, we show that by using appropriate shaping of the latent space, our model allows us to design molecules that are (locally) optimal in desired properties. Qi Liu 0049, Miltiadis Allamanis, Marc Brockschmidt, Alexander L. Gaunt |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2017 | DeepCoder: Learning to Write Programs
Matej Balog, Alexander L. Gaunt, Marc Brockschmidt, Sebastian Nowozin, Daniel Tarlow |
ICLR (Poster) | 2 |
| 2017 | Neural Program Lattices
Chengtao Li, Daniel Tarlow, Alexander L. Gaunt, Marc Brockschmidt, Nate Kushman |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2017 | Differentiable Programs with Neural LibrariesabstractWe develop a framework for combining differentiable programming languages with neural networks. Using this framework we create end-to-end trainable systems that learn to write interpretable algorithms with perceptual components. We explore the benefits of inductive biases for strong generalization and modularity that come from the program-like structure of our models. In particular, modularity allows us to learn a library of (neural) functions which grows and improves as more tasks are solved. Empirically, we show that this leads to lifelong learning systems that transfer knowledge to new tasks more effectively than baselines. Alexander L. Gaunt, Marc Brockschmidt, Nate Kushman, Daniel Tarlow |
ICML | 1 |
| 2016 | Training Neural Nets to Aggregate Crowdsourced Responses
Alexander L. Gaunt, Diana Borsa, Yoram Bachrach |
UAI | 1 |