Abstract We present Sprout , the first sound and complete implementability checker for symbolic multiparty protocols. Sprout supports protocols with dependent refinements on message values, loop memory, and multiparty communication with generalized, sender-driven choice. Sprout checks implementability via an optimized, sound and complete reduction to the fixpoint logic $$\mu $$ μ CLP, and uses MuVal as a backend solver for $$\mu $$ μ CLP instances. We evaluate Sprout on an extended benchmark suite of implementable and non-implementable examples, and show that Sprout outperforms its competititors in terms of expressivity and precision, and provides competitive runtime performance. Sprout additionally provides support for verifying custom functional correctness properties beyond implementability.

Abstract We propose the Automata-based Multiparty Protocols framework (AMP) for top-down protocol development. The framework features a new very general formalism for global protocol specifications called Protocol State Machines (PSMs), Communicating State Machines (CSMs) as specifications for local participants, and a type system to check a $$\pi $$ π -calculus with session interleaving and delegation against the CSM specification. Moreover, we define a large class of PSMs, called “tame”, for which we provide a sound and complete PSPACE projection operation that computes a CSM describing the same protocol as a given PSM if one exists. We propose these components as a backwards-compatible new backend for frameworks in the style of Multiparty Session Types. In comparison to the latter, AMP offers a considerable improvement in expressivity, decoupling of the various components (e.g. projection and typing), and robustness (thanks to the complete projection).

We study the implementability problem for an expressive class of symbolic communication protocols involving multiple participants. Our symbolic protocols describe infinite states and data values using dependent refinement predicates. Implementability asks whether a global protocol specification admits a distributed, asynchronous implementation, namely one for each participant, that is deadlock-free and exhibits the same behavior as the specification. We provide a unified explanation of seemingly disparate sources of non-implementability through a precise semantic characterization of implementability for infinite protocols. Our characterization reduces the problem of implementability to (co)reachability in the global protocol restricted to each participant. This compositional reduction yields the first sound and relatively complete algorithm for checking implementability of symbolic protocols. We use our characterization to show that for finite protocols, implementability is co-NP-complete for explicit representations and PSPACE-complete for symbolic representations. The finite, explicit fragment subsumes a previously studied fragment of multiparty session types for which our characterization yields a co-NP decision procedure, tightening a prior PSPACE upper bound.

Abstract Multiparty session types (MSTs) are a type-based approach to verifying communication protocols, represented as global types in the framework. We present a precise subtyping relation for asynchronous MSTs with communicating state machines (CSMs) as implementation model. We address two problems: when can a local implementation safely substitute another, and when does an arbitrary CSM implement a global type? We define safety with respect to a given global type, in terms of subprotocol fidelity and deadlock freedom. Our implementation model subsumes existing work which considers local types with restricted choice. We exploit the connection between MST subtyping and refinement to formulate concise conditions that are directly checkable on the candidate implementations, and use them to show that both problems are decidable in polynomial time.

Abstract Multiparty session types (MSTs) are a type-based approach to verifying communication protocols. Central to MSTs is a projection operator: a partial function that maps protocols represented as global types to correct-by-construction implementations for each participant, represented as a communicating state machine. Existing projection operators are syntactic in nature, and trade efficiency for completeness. We present the first projection operator that is sound, complete, and efficient. Our projection separates synthesis from checking implementability. For synthesis, we use a simple automata-theoretic construction; for checking implementability, we present succinct conditions that summarize insights into the property of implementability. We use these conditions to show that MST implementability is PSPACE-complete. This improves upon a previous decision procedure that is in EXPSPACE and applies to a smaller class of MSTs. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach using a prototype implementation, which handles global types not supported by previous work without sacrificing performance.

Multiparty session types (MSTs) provide efficient means to specify and verify asynchronous message-passing systems. For a global type, which specifies all interactions between roles in a system, the implementability problem asks whether there are local specifications for all roles such that their composition is deadlock-free and generates precisely the specified executions. Decidability of the implementability problem is an open question. We answer it positively for global types with sender-driven choice, which allow a sender to send to different receivers upon branching and a receiver to receive from different senders. To achieve this, we generalise results from the domain of high-level message sequence charts (HMSCs). This connection also allows us to comprehensively investigate how HMSC techniques can be adapted to the MST setting. This comprises techniques to make the problem algorithmically more tractable as well as a variant of implementability that may open new design space for MSTs. Inspired by potential performance benefits, we introduce a generalisation of the implementability problem that we, unfortunately, prove to be undecidable.

Multiparty session types (MSTs) provide an efficient methodology for specifying and verifying message passing software systems. In the theory of MSTs, a global type specifies the interaction among the roles at the global level. A local specification for each role is generated by projecting from the global type on to the message exchanges it participates in. Whenever a global type can be projected on to each role, the composition of the projections is deadlock free and has exactly the behaviours specified by the global type. The key to the usability of MSTs is the projection operation: a more expressive projection allows more systems to be type-checked but requires a more difficult soundness argument. In this paper, we generalise the standard projection operation in MSTs. This allows us to model and type-check many design patterns in distributed systems, such as load balancing, that are rejected by the standard projection. The key to the new projection is an analysis that tracks causality between messages. Our soundness proof uses novel graph-theoretic techniques from the theory of message-sequence charts. We demonstrate the efficacy of the new projection operation by showing many global types for common patterns that can be projected under our projection but not under the standard projection operation.

We develop a theory of decidable inductive invariants for an infinite-state variant of the Applied pi-calculus, with applications to automatic verification of stateful cryptographic protocols with unbounded sessions/nonces. Since the problem is undecidable in general, we introduce depth-bounded protocols, a strict generalisation of a class from the literature, for which our decidable analysis is sound and complete. Our core contribution is a procedure to check that an invariant is inductive, which implies that every reachable configuration satisfies it. Our invariants can capture security properties like secrecy, can be inferred automatically, and represent an independently checkable certificate of correctness. We provide a prototype implementation and we report on its performance on some textbook examples.

Motivated by a string of recent errata, the paper argues that mechanized, yet readable schedulability proofs are desirable, feasible to create with current tools and with reasonable effort, and beneficial beyond the increase in confidence. To facilitate such mechanized analyses, PROSA, a new open-source foundation for formally proven schedulability analyses that prioritizes readability, is presented. The approach is demonstrated with a case study that mechanizes multiprocessor response-time analysis, including new variants for parallel jobs and release jitter.