VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Daniele Bonadiman
dblp:185/5551
· DBLP profile ↗
10ranked-venue papers
1as first author
6since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 1 first-author · 6 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 48% Question answering and dialogue systems · 32% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% |
Topics — the 15 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
task-oriented dialogue |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | DFEE: Interactive DataFlow Execution and Evaluation Kit · AAAI 2023 Injecting Domain Knowledge in Language Models for Task-oriented Dialogue Systems · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
inference-time alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
multilingual reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code · ACL (1) 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
structured reasoning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code · ACL (1) 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue evaluation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | DFEE: Interactive DataFlow Execution and Evaluation Kit · AAAI 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering › knowledge integration
domain knowledge integration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Injecting Domain Knowledge in Language Models for Task-oriented Dialogue Systems · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Injecting Domain Knowledge in Language Models for Task-oriented Dialogue Systems · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems › answer extraction
answer sentence selection |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Ranking Kernels for Structures and Embeddings: A Hybrid Preference and Classification Model · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Ranking Kernels for Structures and Embeddings: A Hybrid Preference and Classification Model · EMNLP 2017 |
Information retrieval › ranking
preference ranking |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Ranking Kernels for Structures and Embeddings: A Hybrid Preference and Classification Model · EMNLP 2017 |
Information retrieval › ranking
ranking model |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Ranking Kernels for Structures and Embeddings: A Hybrid Preference and Classification Model · EMNLP 2017 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
code reasoning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through Code · ACL (1) 2024 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge engineering › knowledge integration
knowledge base integration |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Injecting Domain Knowledge in Language Models for Task-oriented Dialogue Systems · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval › question answering
community question answering |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Ranking Kernels for Structures and Embeddings: A Hybrid Preference and Classification Model · EMNLP 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9decoding-time intervention · 0.9prompt engineering · 0.8machine translation · 0.8semantic parsing · 0.7tree kernel · 0.6support vector machine · 0.6knowledge probing · 0.6convolutional neural network · 0.6adapter · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | DeAL: Decoding-time Alignment for Large Language ModelsabstractJames Y. Huang, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi-An Lai, Arshit Gupta, Nikolaos Pappas, Saab Mansour, Katrin Kirchhoff, Dan Roth. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. James Y. Huang, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi-An Lai, Arshit Gupta, Nikolaos Pappas 0004, Saab Mansour, Katrin Kirchhoff, Dan Roth 0001 |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | Eliciting Better Multilingual Structured Reasoning from LLMs through CodeabstractThe development of large language models (LLM) has shown progress on reasoning, though studies have largely considered either English or simple reasoning tasks.To address this, we introduce a multilingual structured reasoning and explanation dataset, termed xSTREET, that covers four tasks across six languages.xSTREET exposes a gap in base LLM performance between English and non-English reasoning tasks. 1 We then propose two methods to remedy this gap, building on the insight that LLMs trained on code are better reasoners.First, at training time, we augment a code dataset with multilingual comments using machine translation while keeping program code as-is.Second, at inference time, we bridge the gap between training and inference by employing a prompt structure that incorporates step-by-step code primitives to derive new facts and find a solution.Our methods show improved multilingual performance on xSTREET, most notably on the scientific commonsense reasoning subtask.Furthermore, the models show no regression on non-reasoning tasks, thus demonstrating our techniques maintain general-purpose abilities. Bryan Li, Tamer Alkhouli, Daniele Bonadiman, Nikolaos Pappas 0004, Saab Mansour |
ACL (1) | 3 |
| 2024 | FLAP: Flow-Adhering Planning with Constrained Decoding in LLMsabstractShamik Roy, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Saab Mansour, Arshit Gupta. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024. Shamik Roy, Sailik Sengupta, Daniele Bonadiman, Saab Mansour, Arshit Gupta |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2023 | DFEE: Interactive DataFlow Execution and Evaluation KitabstractDataFlow has been emerging as a new paradigm for building task-oriented chatbots due to its expressive semantic representations of the dialogue tasks. Despite the availability of a large dataset SMCalFlow and a simplified syntax, the development and evaluation of DataFlow-based chatbots remain challenging due to the system complexity and the lack of downstream toolchains. In this demonstration, we present DFEE, an interactive DataFlow Execution and Evaluation toolkit that supports execution, visualization and benchmarking of semantic parsers given dialogue input and backend database. We demonstrate the system via a complex dialog task: event scheduling that involves temporal reasoning. It also supports diagnosing the parsing results via a friendly interface that allows developers to examine dynamic DataFlow and the corresponding execution results. To illustrate how to benchmark SoTA models, we propose a novel benchmark that covers more sophisticated event scheduling scenarios and a new metric on task success evaluation. The codes of DFEE have been released on https://github.com/amazonscience/dataflow-evaluation-toolkit. Han He, Song Feng 0001, Daniele Bonadiman, Yi Zhang 0053, Saab Mansour |
AAAI | 3 |
| 2022 | Injecting Domain Knowledge in Language Models for Task-oriented Dialogue SystemsabstractPre-trained language models (PLM) have advanced the state-of-the-art across NLP applications, but lack domain-specific knowledge that does not naturally occur in pre-training data.Previous studies augmented PLMs with symbolic knowledge for different downstream NLP tasks.However, knowledge bases (KBs) utilized in these studies are usually large-scale and static, in contrast to small, domain-specific, and modifiable knowledge bases that are prominent in real-world task-oriented dialogue (TOD) systems.In this paper, we showcase the advantages of injecting domain-specific knowledge prior to fine-tuning on TOD tasks.To this end, we utilize light-weight adapters that can be easily integrated with PLMs and serve as a repository for facts learned from different KBs.To measure the efficacy of proposed knowledge injection methods, we introduce Knowledge Probing using Response Selection (KPRS) -a probe designed specifically for TOD models.Experiments 1 on KPRS and the response generation task show improvements of knowledge injection with adapters over strong baselines. * Work performed while at AWS AI Labs 1 https://github.com/amazon-research/ domain-knowledge-injection Denis Emelin, Daniele Bonadiman, Sawsan Alqahtani, Saab Mansour |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2021 | Knowledge-Driven Slot Constraints for Goal-Oriented Dialogue SystemsabstractPiyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Daniele Bonadiman, Saab Mansour. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Piyawat Lertvittayakumjorn, Daniele Bonadiman, Saab Mansour |
NAACL-HLT | 2 |
| 2020 | A Study on Efficiency, Accuracy and Document Structure for Answer Sentence SelectionabstractAn essential task of most Question Answering (QA) systems is to re-rank the set of answer candidates, i.e., Answer Sentence Selection (AS2).These candidates are typically sentences either extracted from one or more documents preserving their natural order or retrieved by a search engine.Most state-of-the-art approaches to the task use huge neural models, such as BERT, or complex attentive architectures.In this paper, we argue that by exploiting the intrinsic structure of the original rank together with an effective word-relatedness encoder, we achieve the highest accuracy among the cost-efficient models, with two orders of magnitude fewer parameters than the current state of the art.Our model takes 9.5 seconds to train on the WikiQA dataset, i.e., very fast in comparison with the ∼ 18 minutes required by a standard BERT-base fine-tuning. Daniele Bonadiman, Alessandro Moschitti |
COLING | 1 |
| 2017 | Ranking Kernels for Structures and Embeddings: A Hybrid Preference and Classification ModelabstractRecent work has shown that Tree Kernels (TKs) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) obtain the state of the art in answer sentence reranking.Additionally, their combination used in Support Vector Machines (SVMs) is promising as it can exploit both the syntactic patterns captured by TKs and the embeddings learned by CNNs.However, the embeddings are constructed according to a classification function, which is not directly exploitable in the preference ranking algorithm of SVMs.In this work, we propose a new hybrid approach combining preference ranking applied to TKs and pointwise ranking applied to CNNs.We show that our approach produces better results on two well-known and rather different datasets: WikiQA for answer sentence selection and SemEval cQA for comment selection in Community Question Answering. Kateryna Tymoshenko, Daniele Bonadiman, Alessandro Moschitti |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2016 | Learning to Rank Non-Factoid Answers: Comment Selection in Web ForumsabstractRecent initiatives in IR community have shown the importance of going beyond factoid Question Answering (QA) in order to design useful real-world applications. Questions asking for descriptions or explanations are much more difficult to be solved, e.g., the machine learning models cannot focus on specific answer words or their lexical type. Thus, researchers have started to explore powerful methods for feature engineering. Two of the most promising methods are convolution tree kernels (CTKs) and convolutional neural networks (CNNs) as they have been shown to obtain high performance in the task of answer sentence selection in factoid QA. In this paper, we design state-of-the-art models for non-factoid QA also carried out on noisy data. In particular, we study and compare models for comment selection in a community QA (cQA) scenario, where the majority of questions regard descriptions or explanations. To deal with such complex task, we incorporate relational information holding between questions and comments as well as domain-specific features into both convolutional models above. Kateryna Tymoshenko, Daniele Bonadiman, Alessandro Moschitti |
CIKM | 2 |
| 2016 | Convolutional Neural Networks vs. Convolution Kernels: Feature Engineering for Answer Sentence RerankingabstractKateryna Tymoshenko, Daniele Bonadiman, Alessandro Moschitti. Proceedings of the 2016 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2016. Kateryna Tymoshenko, Daniele Bonadiman, Alessandro Moschitti |
HLT-NAACL | 2 |