Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dave Langan

dblp:186/3388 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1986
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 62% Distributed systems · 19% Performance modeling and evaluation · 19%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Embedded and real-time systems › manufacturing systems
computer integrated manufacturing
0.011986
Functions of a manufacturing workstation controller · ICRA 1986

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative assessment matrix · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1986 Functions of a manufacturing workstation controller
abstract
This paper details the functions of a generic manufacturing workstation controller in the context of a computer integrated manufacturing (CIM) system. For each of these functions the required software and hardware performance characteristics are assessed. A brief overview of CIM is presented followed by a discussion of manufacturing workstations. The functions presented and described are task decomposition, inventory management, monitoring and control, reporting and communications. The performance attributes are presented using a qualitative scale. In software they include several characteristics of the operating system, application development potential, and communications support. The hardware attributes are discussed in terms of modularity of architecture, computing speed, memory requirements, I/O, interrupt structure, network support, remote unit support and environmental features. The results are concisely presented on two qualitative assessment matrices which match functions with performance attributes. Details supporting these assessments are presented in the text.
Frank DiCesare, Geoffrey C. Goldbogen, Dave Langan, Suresh Rajan, Alan A. Desrochers
ICRA3