Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Evgenii Tsymbalov
dblp:186/6507
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-9072-1172ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 47% Trustworthy machine learning · 36% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Uncertainty Estimation of Transformer Predictions for Misclassification Detection · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
gaussian process approximation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Uncertainty Estimation of Transformer Predictions for Misclassification Detection · ACL (1) 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active Learning · IJCAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty estimation · 0.6misclassification detection · 0.6gaussian process · 0.4bayesian neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Uncertainty Estimation of Transformer Predictions for Misclassification DetectionabstractArtem Vazhentsev, Gleb Kuzmin, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Evgenii Tsymbalov, Kirill Fedyanin, Maxim Panov, Alexander Panchenko, Gleb Gusev, Mikhail Burtsev, Manvel Avetisian, Leonid Zhukov. Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2022. Artem Vazhentsev, Gleb Kuzmin, Artem Shelmanov, Akim Tsvigun, Evgenii Tsymbalov, Kirill Fedyanin, Maxim Panov, Alexander Panchenko, Gleb Gusev, Mikhail Burtsev 0001, Manvel Avetisian, Leonid Zhukov |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2021 | How Certain is Your Transformer?abstractArtem Shelmanov, Evgenii Tsymbalov, Dmitri Puzyrev, Kirill Fedyanin, Alexander Panchenko, Maxim Panov. Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume. 2021. Artem Shelmanov, Evgenii Tsymbalov, Dmitry Puzyrev, Kirill Fedyanin, Alexander Panchenko, Maxim Panov |
EACL | 2 |
| 2019 | Deeper Connections between Neural Networks and Gaussian Processes Speed-up Active LearningabstractActive learning methods for neural networks are usually based on greedy criteria, which ultimately give a single new design point for the evaluation. Such an approach requires either some heuristics to sample a batch of design points at one active learning iteration, or retraining the neural network after adding each data point, which is computationally inefficient. Moreover, uncertainty estimates for neural networks sometimes are overconfident for the points lying far from the training sample. In this work, we propose to approximate Bayesian neural networks (BNN) by Gaussian processes (GP), which allows us to update the uncertainty estimates of predictions efficiently without retraining the neural network while avoiding overconfident uncertainty prediction for out-of-sample points. In a series of experiments on real-world data, including large-scale problems of chemical and physical modeling, we show the superiority of the proposed approach over the state-of-the-art methods. Evgenii Tsymbalov, Sergei Makarychev, Alexander Shapeev, Maxim Panov |
IJCAI | 1 |