Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shamak Dutta

dblp:186/7984 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5726-1269ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 43% Efficient and distributed learning · 25% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25%
Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 82% Approximation and online algorithms · 18%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › mobile robot navigation › navigation planning
informative path planning
1.522025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Approximation Algorithms for Robot Tours in Random Fields with Guaranteed Estimation Accuracy · ICRA 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › active learning
active regression
0.912025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › gaussian process
gaussian process regression
0.912025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Mathematical optimization › discrete optimization
mixed integer linear programming
0.912025
Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2025
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms
0.212023
Approximation Algorithms for Robot Tours in Random Fields with Guaranteed Estimation Accuracy · ICRA 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse optimization · 1.7mixed integer program · 1.7gaussian process · 1.7approximation algorithm · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Informative Path Planning for Active Regression With Gaussian Processes via Sparse Optimization
abstract
We study informative path planning for active regression in Gaussian Processes (GP). Here, a resource constrained robot team collects measurements of an unknown function, assumed to be a sample from a GP, with the goal of minimizing the trace of the$M$-weighted expected squared estimation error covariance (where$M$is a positive semidefinite matrix) resulting from the GP posterior mean. While greedy heuristics are a popular solution in the case of length constrained paths, it remains a challenge to computeoptimalsolutions in the discrete setting subject to routing constraints. We show that this challenge is surprisingly easy to circumvent. Using the optimality of the posterior mean for a class of functions of the squared loss yields an exact formulation as a mixed integer program. We demonstrate that this approach finds optimal solutions in a variety of settings in seconds and when terminated early, it finds sub-optimal solutions of higher quality than existing heuristics.
Shamak Dutta, Nils Wilde, Stephen L. Smith 0001
IEEE Trans. Robotics1
2023 Approximation Algorithms for Robot Tours in Random Fields with Guaranteed Estimation Accuracy
abstract
We study the sample placement and shortest tour problem for robots tasked with mapping environmental phenomena modeled as stationary random fields. The objective is to minimize the resources used (samples or tour length) while guaranteeing estimation accuracy. We give approximation algorithms for both problems in convex environments. These improve previously known results, both in terms of theoretical guarantees and in simulations. In addition, we disprove an existing claim in the literature on a lower bound for a solution to the sample placement problem.
Shamak Dutta, Nils Wilde, Pratap Tokekar, Stephen L. Smith 0001
ICRA1
2016 Barcodes for medical image retrieval using autoencoded Radon transform
abstract
Using content-based binary codes to tag digital images has emerged as a promising retrieval technology. Recently, Radon barcodes (RBCs) have been introduced as a new binary descriptor for image search. RBCs are generated by binarization of Radon projections and by assembling them into a vector, namely the barcode. A simple local thresholding has been suggested for binarization. In this paper, we put forward the idea of “autoencoded Radon barcodes”. Using images in a training dataset, we autoencode Radon projections to perform binarization on outputs of hidden layers. We employed the mini-batch stochastic gradient descent approach for the training. Each hidden layer of the autoencoder can produce a barcode using a threshold determined based on the range of the logistic function used. The compressing capability of autoencoders apparently reduces the redundancies inherent in Radon projections leading to more accurate retrieval results. The IRMA dataset with 14,410 x-ray images is used to validate the performance of the proposed method. The experimental results, containing comparison with RBCs, SURF and BRISK, show that autoencoded Radon barcode (ARBC) has the capacity to capture important information and to learn richer representations resulting in lower retrieval errors for image retrieval measured with the accuracy of the first hit only.
Hamid R. Tizhoosh, Christopher Mitcheltree, Shujin Zhu, Shamak Dutta
ICPR4