Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Hana Ando

dblp:186/8167 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-4714-9673ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Coding theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Electronic design automation · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Coding theory
error-correcting codes
0.312018
Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code
0.312018
Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
parity-check matrix
0.312018
Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
x-codes
0.312018
Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test
0.112018
Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic combinatorics · 0.7design theory · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes
abstract
An error-erasure channel is a simple noise model that introduces both errors and erasures. While the two types of errors can be corrected simultaneously with error-correcting codes, it is also known that any linear code allows for first correcting errors and then erasures in two-step decoding. In particular, a carefully designed parity-check matrix not only allows for separating erasures from errors but also makes it possible to efficiently correct erasures. The separating redundancy of a linear code is the number of parity-check equations in a smallest parity-check matrix that has the required property for this error-erasure separation. In a sense, it is a parameter of a linear code that represents the minimum overhead for efficiently separating erasures from errors. While several bounds on separating redundancy are known, there still remains a wide gap between upper and lower bounds except for a few limited cases. In this paper, using probabilistic combinatorics and design theory, we improve both upper and lower bounds on separating redundancy. We also show a relation between parity-check matrices for error-erasure separation and special matrices, called X-codes, for data compaction circuits in VLSI testing. This leads to an exponentially improved bound on the size of an optimal X-code.
Yu Tsunoda, Yuichiro Fujiwara, Hana Ando, Peter Vandendriessche
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory3