Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Hana Ando
dblp:186/8167
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-4714-9673ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Coding theory · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Electronic design automation · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory
error-correcting codes |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes
linear code |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes › block codes › linear code
parity-check matrix |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
x-codes |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Electronic design automation
hardware verification and test |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-Codes · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
probabilistic combinatorics · 0.7design theory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | Bounds on Separating Redundancy of Linear Codes and Rates of X-CodesabstractAn error-erasure channel is a simple noise model that introduces both errors and erasures. While the two types of errors can be corrected simultaneously with error-correcting codes, it is also known that any linear code allows for first correcting errors and then erasures in two-step decoding. In particular, a carefully designed parity-check matrix not only allows for separating erasures from errors but also makes it possible to efficiently correct erasures. The separating redundancy of a linear code is the number of parity-check equations in a smallest parity-check matrix that has the required property for this error-erasure separation. In a sense, it is a parameter of a linear code that represents the minimum overhead for efficiently separating erasures from errors. While several bounds on separating redundancy are known, there still remains a wide gap between upper and lower bounds except for a few limited cases. In this paper, using probabilistic combinatorics and design theory, we improve both upper and lower bounds on separating redundancy. We also show a relation between parity-check matrices for error-erasure separation and special matrices, called X-codes, for data compaction circuits in VLSI testing. This leads to an exponentially improved bound on the size of an optimal X-code. Yu Tsunoda, Yuichiro Fujiwara, Hana Ando, Peter Vandendriessche |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 3 |