VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mary Maller
dblp:187/5714
· DBLP profile ↗
22ranked-venue papers
2as first author
14since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 20 · 2 first-author · 12 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | On the Adaptive Security of Key-Unique Threshold Signatures
Michele Ciampi, Elizabeth C. Crites, Chelsea Komlo, Mary Maller |
CRYPTO (2) | 4 |
| 2025 | IVC in the Open-and-Sign Random Oracle Model
Mary Maller, Nicolas Mohnblatt, Aranxta Zapico |
ASIACRYPT (7) | 1 |
| 2024 | Threshold Raccoon: Practical Threshold Signatures from Standard Lattice Assumptions
Rafaël Del Pino, Shuichi Katsumata, Mary Maller, Fabrice Mouhartem, Thomas Prest, Markku-Juhani O. Saarinen |
EUROCRYPT (2) | 3 |
| 2023 | Bingo: Adaptivity and Asynchrony in Verifiable Secret Sharing and Distributed Key Generation
Ittai Abraham, Philipp Jovanovic, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn, Gilad Stern |
CRYPTO (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Fully Adaptive Schnorr Threshold Signatures
Elizabeth C. Crites, Chelsea Komlo, Mary Maller |
CRYPTO (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Snowblind: A Threshold Blind Signature in Pairing-Free Groups
Elizabeth C. Crites, Chelsea Komlo, Mary Maller, Stefano Tessaro, Chenzhi Zhu |
CRYPTO (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Reaching consensus for asynchronous distributed key generation
Ittai Abraham, Philipp Jovanovic, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn, Gilad Stern, Alin Tomescu |
Distributed Comput. | 3 |
| 2022 | Caulk: Lookup Arguments in Sublinear TimeabstractWe present position-hiding linkability for vector commitment schemes: one can prove in zero knowledge that one or m values that comprise commitment \cm all belong to the vector of size N committed to in \com. Our construction \textsfCaulk can be used for membership proofs and lookup arguments and outperforms all existing alternatives in prover time by orders of magnitude. Arantxa Zapico, Vitalik Buterin, Dmitry Khovratovich, Mary Maller, Anca Nitulescu, Mark Simkin 0001 |
CCS | 4 |
| 2022 | Better than Advertised Security for Non-interactive Threshold Signatures
Mihir Bellare, Elizabeth C. Crites, Chelsea Komlo, Mary Maller, Stefano Tessaro, Chenzhi Zhu |
CRYPTO (4) | 4 |
| 2022 | SNARKBlock: Federated Anonymous Blocklisting from Hidden Common Input Aggregate ProofsabstractZero-knowledge blocklists allow cross-platform blocking of users but, counter-intuitively, do not link users identities inter- or intra-platform, or to the fact they were blocked. Unfortunately, existing approaches (Tsang et al. ’10) require that servers do work linear in the size of the blocklist for each verification of a non-membership proof.We design and implement SNARKBLOCK, a new protocol for zero-knowledge blocklisting with server-side verification that is logarithmic in the size of the blocklist. SNARKBLOCK is also the first approach to support ad-hoc, federated blocklisting: websites can mix and match their own blocklists from other blocklists and dynamically choose which identity providers they trust.Our core technical advance, of separate interest, is the HICIAP zero-knowledge proof system, which addresses a common problem in privacy-preserving protocols: using zero-knowledge proofs for repeated but unlinakble interactions. Rerandomzing a Groth16 proof achieves unlinkability without the need to recompute the proof for every interaction. But this technique does not apply to applications where each interaction includes multiple Groth16 proofs over a common hidden input (e.g., the user’s identity). Here, the best known approach is to commit to the hidden input and feed it to each proof, but this creates a persistent identifier, forcing recomputation. HICIAP resolves this problem by aggregating n Groth16 proofs into one $O(\log n) -$sized, $O(\log n) -$verification time proof which also shows that the input proofs share a hidden input. Because HICIAP is zero-knowledge, repeated shows of the same aggregate or an updated aggregate are unlinkable even though the underlying Groth16 proofs are never recomputed. Michael Rosenberg, Mary Maller, Ian Miers |
SP | 2 |
| 2021 | Proofs for Inner Pairing Products and Applications
Benedikt Bünz, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra 0001, Nirvan Tyagi, Psi Vesely |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 2 |
| 2021 | Snarky Ceremonies
Markulf Kohlweiss, Mary Maller, Janno Siim, Mikhail Volkhov |
ASIACRYPT (3) | 2 |
| 2021 | Aggregatable Distributed Key Generation
Kobi Gurkan, Philipp Jovanovic, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn, Gilad Stern, Alin Tomescu |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 3 |
| 2021 | Reaching Consensus for Asynchronous Distributed Key GenerationabstractWe give a protocol for Asynchronous Distributed Key Generation (A-DKG) that is optimally resilient (can withstand f < n over 3 faulty parties), has a constant expected number of rounds, has Õ (n3) expected communication complexity, and assumes only the existence of a PKI. Prior to our work, the best A-DKG protocols required Ω(n) expected number of rounds, and Ω(n4) expected communication. Ittai Abraham, Philipp Jovanovic, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn, Gilad Stern, Alin Tomescu |
PODC | 3 |
| 2020 | Marlin: Preprocessing zkSNARKs with Universal and Updatable SRS
Alessandro Chiesa, Yuncong Hu, Mary Maller, Pratyush Mishra 0001, Psi Vesely, Nicholas P. Ward |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 3 |
| 2020 | Reputable List Curation from Decentralized VotingabstractToken-curated registries (TCRs) are a mechanism by which a set of users are able to jointly curate a reputable list about real-world information. Entries in the registry may have any form, so this primitive has been proposed for use—and deployed—in a variety of decentralized applications, ranging from the simple joint creation of lists to helping to prevent the spread of misinformation online. Despite this interest, the security of this primitive is not well understood, and indeed existing constructions do not achieve strong or provable notions of security or privacy. In this paper, we provide a formal cryptographic treatment of TCRs as well as a construction that provably hides the votes cast by individual curators. Along the way, we provide a model and proof of security for an underlying voting scheme, which may be of independent interest. We also demonstrate, via an implementation and evaluation, that our construction is practical enough to be deployed even on a constrained decentralized platform like Ethereum. Elizabeth C. Crites, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn, Rebekah Mercer |
Proc. Priv. Enhancing Technol. | 2 |
| 2019 | Sonic: Zero-Knowledge SNARKs from Linear-Size Universal and Updatable Structured Reference StringsabstractEver since their introduction, zero-knowledge proofs have become an important tool for addressing privacy and scalability concerns in a variety of applications. In many systems each client downloads and verifies every new proof, and so proofs must be small and cheap to verify. The most practical schemes require either a trusted setup, as in (pre-processing) zk-SNARKs, or verification complexity that scales linearly with the complexity of the relation, as in Bulletproofs. The structured reference strings required by most zkSNARK schemes can be constructed with multi-party computation protocols, but the resulting parameters are specific to an individual relation. Groth et al. discovered a zk-SNARK protocol with a universal structured reference string that is also updatable, but the string scales quadratically in the size of the supported relations. Here we describe a zero-knowledge SNARK, Sonic, which supports a universal and continually updatable structured reference string that scales linearly in size. We also describe a generally useful technique in which untrusted “helpers” can compute advice that allows batches of proofs to be verified more efficiently. Sonic proofs are constant size, and in the “helped” batch verification context the marginal cost of verification is comparable with the most efficient SNARKs in the literature Mary Maller, Sean Bowe, Markulf Kohlweiss, Sarah Meiklejohn |
CCS | 1 |
| 2018 | Arya: Nearly Linear-Time Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Correct Program Execution
Jonathan Bootle, Andrea Cerulli, Jens Groth, Sune K. Jakobsen, Mary Maller |
ASIACRYPT (1) | 5 |
| 2018 | Updatable and Universal Common Reference Strings with Applications to zk-SNARKs
Jens Groth, Markulf Kohlweiss, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn, Ian Miers |
CRYPTO (3) | 3 |
| 2018 | An Empirical Analysis of Anonymity in Zcash
George Kappos, Haaroon Yousaf, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn |
USENIX Security Symposium | 3 |
| 2017 | Snarky Signatures: Minimal Signatures of Knowledge from Simulation-Extractable SNARKs
Jens Groth, Mary Maller |
CRYPTO (2) | 2 |
| 2016 | Déjà Q All Over Again: Tighter and Broader Reductions of q-Type Assumptions
Melissa Chase, Mary Maller, Sarah Meiklejohn |
ASIACRYPT (2) | 2 |