Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fatemeh Karimi Nejadasl
dblp:188/0133
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0000-2478-2383ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 4 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 39% Video understanding and tracking · 38% 3D vision · 15% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
3d point cloud segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | 3D-AVS: LiDAR-based 3D Auto-Vocabulary Segmentation · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
open-vocabulary segmentation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | 3D-AVS: LiDAR-based 3D Auto-Vocabulary Segmentation · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › point cloud analysis › point cloud learning
point cloud representation learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | T-MAE : Temporal Masked Autoencoders for Point Cloud Representation Learning · ECCV (11) 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
video object detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Objects do not disappear: Video object detection by single-frame object location anticipation · ICCV 2023 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking
action recognition |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | No Frame Left Behind: Full Video Action Recognition · CVPR 2021 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
semantic segmentation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | 3D-AVS: LiDAR-based 3D Auto-Vocabulary Segmentation · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning › self-supervised representation learning
masked autoencoder |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | T-MAE : Temporal Masked Autoencoders for Point Cloud Representation Learning · ECCV (11) 2024 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › video classification
resource-efficient video recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | No Frame Left Behind: Full Video Action Recognition · CVPR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
text-point semantic similarity · 0.9sparse masked attention pooling · 0.9temporal modeling · 0.8masked autoencoder · 0.8pseudo-motion supervision · 0.7keyframe feature computation · 0.7temporal clustering · 0.5hamming distance aggregation · 0.5end-to-end training · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 3D-AVS: LiDAR-based 3D Auto-Vocabulary SegmentationabstractOpen-vocabulary segmentation methods offer promising capabilities in detecting unseen object categories, but the category must be aware and needs to be provided by a human, either via a text prompt or pre-labeled datasets, thus limiting their scalability. We propose 3D-AVS, a method for Auto-Vocabulary Segmentation of 3D point clouds for which the vocabulary is unknown and auto-generated for each input at runtime, thus eliminating the human in the loop and typically providing a substantially larger vocabulary for richer annotations. 3D-AVS first recognizes semantic entities from image or point cloud data and then segments all points with the automatically generated vocabulary. Our method incorporates both image-based and point-based recognition, enhancing robustness under challenging lighting conditions where geometric information from Li-DAR is especially valuable. Our point-based recognition features a Sparse Masked Attention Pooling (SMAP) module to enrich the diversity of recognized objects. To address the challenges of evaluating unknown vocabularies and avoid annotation biases from label synonyms, hierarchies, or semantic overlaps, we introduce the annotation-free Text-Point Semantic Similarity (TPSS) metric for assessing generated vocabulary quality. Our evaluations on nuScenes and ScanNet200 demonstrate 3D-AVS’s ability to generate semantic classes with accurate point-wise segmentations. Weijie Wei 0001, Osman Ülger, Fatemeh Karimi Nejadasl, Theo Gevers, Martin R. Oswald |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2024 | T-MAE : Temporal Masked Autoencoders for Point Cloud Representation Learning
Weijie Wei 0001, Fatemeh Karimi Nejadasl, Theo Gevers, Martin R. Oswald |
ECCV (11) | 2 |
| 2023 | Objects do not disappear: Video object detection by single-frame object location anticipationabstractObjects in videos are typically characterized by continuous smooth motion. We exploit continuous smooth motion in three ways. 1) Improved accuracy by using object motion as an additional source of supervision, which we obtain by anticipating object locations from a static keyframe. 2) Improved efficiency by only doing the expensive feature computations on a small subset of all frames. Because neighboring video frames are often redundant, we only compute features for a single static keyframe and predict object locations in subsequent frames. 3) Reduced annotation cost, where we only annotate the keyframe and use smooth pseudo-motion between keyframes. We demonstrate computational efficiency, annotation efficiency, and improved mean average precision compared to the state-of-the-art on four datasets: ImageNet VID, EPIC KITCHENS-55, YouTube-BoundingBoxes and Waymo Open dataset. Our source code is available at https://github.com/L-KID/Video-object-detection-by-location-anticipation. Fatemeh Karimi Nejadasl, Jan C. van Gemert, Olaf Booij, Silvia L. Pintea |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | No Frame Left Behind: Full Video Action RecognitionabstractNot all video frames are equally informative for recognizing an action. It is computationally infeasible to train deep networks on all video frames when actions develop over hundreds of frames. A common heuristic is uniformly sampling a small number of video frames and using these to recognize the action. Instead, here we propose full video action recognition and consider all video frames. To make this computational tractable, we first cluster all frame activations along the temporal dimension based on their similarity with respect to the classification task, and then temporally aggregate the frames in the clusters into a smaller number of representations. Our method is end-to-end trainable and computationally efficient as it relies on temporally localized clustering in combination with fast Hamming distances in feature space. We evaluate on UCF101, HMDB51, Breakfast, and Something-Something V1 and V2, where we compare favorably to existing heuristic frame sampling methods. Silvia L. Pintea, Fatemeh Karimi Nejadasl, Olaf Booij, Jan C. van Gemert |
CVPR | 3 |