Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Omid G. Sani

dblp:188/3655 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 90% Deep learning architectures and training · 10%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › dynamical system representation
latent dynamics
0.912025
BRAID: Input-driven Nonlinear Dynamical Modeling of Neural-Behavioral Data · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning › state representation learning
latent dynamics model
0.812024
Spectral Learning of Shared Dynamics Between Generalized-Linear Processes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
subspace identification
0.812024
Spectral Learning of Shared Dynamics Between Generalized-Linear Processes · NeurIPS 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
recurrent neural network
0.312025
BRAID: Input-driven Nonlinear Dynamical Modeling of Neural-Behavioral Data · ICLR 2025
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics
neural data analysis
0.212024
Spectral Learning of Shared Dynamics Between Generalized-Linear Processes · NeurIPS 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

multi-stage optimization · 1.7input-driven recurrent neural network · 1.7subspace identification · 1.5spectral learning · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 BRAID: Input-driven Nonlinear Dynamical Modeling of Neural-Behavioral Data
abstract
Neural populations exhibit complex recurrent structures that drive behavior, while continuously receiving and integrating external inputs from sensory stimuli, upstream regions, and neurostimulation. However, neural populations are often modeled as autonomous dynamical systems, with little consideration given to the influence of external inputs that shape the population activity and behavioral outcomes. Here, we introduce BRAID, a deep learning framework that models nonlinear neural dynamics underlying behavior while explicitly incorporating any measured external inputs. Our method disentangles intrinsic recurrent neural population dynamics from the effects of inputs by including a forecasting objective within input-driven recurrent neural networks. BRAID further prioritizes the learning of intrinsic dynamics that are related to a behavior of interest by using a multi-stage optimization scheme. We validate BRAID with nonlinear simulations, showing that it can accurately learn the intrinsic dynamics shared between neural and behavioral modalities. We then apply BRAID to motor cortical activity recorded during a motor task and demonstrate that our method more accurately fits the neural-behavioral data by incorporating measured sensory stimuli into the model and improves the forecasting of neural-behavioral data compared with various baseline methods, whether input-driven or not.
Parsa Vahidi, Omid G. Sani, Maryam Modir Shanechi
ICLR2
2024 Spectral Learning of Shared Dynamics Between Generalized-Linear Processes
abstract
Generalized-linear dynamical models (GLDMs) remain a widely-used framework within neuroscience for modeling time-series data, such as neural spiking activity or categorical decision outcomes. Whereas the standard usage of GLDMs is to model a single data source, certain applications require jointly modeling two generalized-linear time-series sources while also dissociating their shared and private dynamics. Most existing GLDM variants and their associated learning algorithms do not support this capability. Here we address this challenge by developing a multi-step analytical subspace identification algorithm for learning a GLDM that explicitly models shared vs. private dynamics within two generalized-linear time-series. In simulations, we demonstrate our algorithm's ability to dissociate and model the dynamics within two time-series sources while being agnostic to their respective observation distributions. In neural data, we consider two specific applications of our algorithm for modeling discrete population spiking activity with respect to a secondary time-series. In both synthetic and real data, GLDMs learned with our algorithm more accurately decoded one time-series from the other using lower-dimensional latent states, as compared to models identified using existing GLDM learning algorithms.
Lucine L. Oganesian, Omid G. Sani, Maryam Modir Shanechi
NeurIPS2