Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yun Fu 0002
dblp:188/4028
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
0000-0002-7695-2759ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Face, body and person analysis · 77% Generative modeling · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
face recognition |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Probabilistic Models for Inference about Identity · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › face synthesis
generative face model |
0.0 | 1 | 2012 | Probabilistic Models for Inference about Identity · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
tied factor analysis · 0.1non-linear manifold modeling · 0.1generative modeling · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2012 | Probabilistic Models for Inference about IdentityabstractMany face recognition algorithms use "distance-based" methods: Feature vectors are extracted from each face and distances in feature space are compared to determine matches. In this paper, we argue for a fundamentally different approach. We consider each image as having been generated from several underlying causes, some of which are due to identity (latent identity variables, or LIVs) and some of which are not. In recognition, we evaluate the probability that two faces have the same underlying identity cause. We make these ideas concrete by developing a series of novel generative models which incorporate both within-individual and between-individual variation. We consider both the linear case, where signal and noise are represented by a subspace, and the nonlinear case, where an arbitrary face manifold can be described and noise is position-dependent. We also develop a "tied" version of the algorithm that allows explicit comparison of faces across quite different viewing conditions. We demonstrate that our model produces results that are comparable to or better than the state of the art for both frontal face recognition and face recognition under varying pose. Simon Prince, Yun Fu 0002, Umar Mohammed, James H. Elder |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 3 |