Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiacheng Xu 0001
dblp:188/6025-1
· DBLP profile ↗
15ranked-venue papers
8as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-9292-6999ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 15 · 8 first-author · 8 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
14 papers |
Language models and text generation · 68% Trustworthy machine learning · 11% Information extraction and text analysis · 7% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 36, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text summarization |
2.5 | 5 | 2023 | Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors · ACL (1) 2023 ASPECTNEWS: Aspect-Oriented Summarization of News Documents · ACL (1) 2022 Dissecting Generation Modes for Abstractive Summarization Models via Ablation and Attribution · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
abstractive summarization |
1.4 | 3 | 2021 | Dissecting Generation Modes for Abstractive Summarization Models via Ablation and Attribution · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 Understanding Neural Abstractive Summarization Models via Uncertainty · EMNLP (1) 2020 Compressive Summarization with Plausibility and Salience Modeling · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
constrained text generation |
1.1 | 2 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 Incorporating Discriminator in Sentence Generation: a Gibbs Sampling Method · AAAI 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
distributed problem solving |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code agent
LLM-based software engineering agent |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
toxicity reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding › decoding strategy
beam search |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Best-k Search Algorithm for Neural Text Generation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for Reranking · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
decoding strategy |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Best-k Search Algorithm for Neural Text Generation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › fact-checking
factual error detection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors · ACL (1) 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
hallucination |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error Detectors · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
reranking |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for Reranking · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Best-k Search Algorithm for Neural Text Generation · ACL (1) 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization › opinion summarization
aspect-based summarization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | ASPECTNEWS: Aspect-Oriented Summarization of News Documents · ACL (1) 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
compressive summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Compressive Summarization with Plausibility and Salience Modeling · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Understanding Neural Abstractive Summarization Models via Uncertainty · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
neural language model |
0.4 | 2 | 2018 | Spherical Latent Spaces for Stable Variational Autoencoders · EMNLP 2018 Cached Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks for Document-Level Sentiment Classification · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
extractive summarization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Neural Extractive Text Summarization with Syntactic Compression · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
gibbs sampling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Incorporating Discriminator in Sentence Generation: a Gibbs Sampling Method · AAAI 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
sentence generation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Incorporating Discriminator in Sentence Generation: a Gibbs Sampling Method · AAAI 2018 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Spherical Latent Spaces for Stable Variational Autoencoders · EMNLP 2018 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Knowledge Graph Representation with Jointly Structural and Textual Encoding · IJCAI 2017 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph embedding |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Knowledge Graph Representation with Jointly Structural and Textual Encoding · IJCAI 2017 |
Software maintenance and evolution › issue management
issue resolution |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering Agents · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › sentiment classification
document-level sentiment classification |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Cached Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks for Document-Level Sentiment Classification · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Cached Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks for Document-Level Sentiment Classification · EMNLP 2016 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
factoid question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
inference efficiency |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for Reranking · ACL (1) 2023 |
Information retrieval › text summarization
query-focused summarization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | ASPECTNEWS: Aspect-Oriented Summarization of News Documents · ACL (1) 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.7agent ensemble · 1.7large language model decoding · 0.8future constraint satisfaction estimation · 0.8transformer encoding · 0.7token-factored reranking · 0.7heap pruning · 0.7error taxonomy · 0.7error detection · 0.7best-first search · 0.7synthetic training data · 0.6keyword matching · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Diversity Empowers Intelligence: Integrating Expertise of Software Engineering AgentsabstractLarge language model (LLM) agents have shown great potential in solving real-world software engineering (SWE) problems. The most advanced open-source SWE agent can resolve over 27% of real GitHub issues in SWE-Bench Lite. However, these sophisticated agent frameworks exhibit varying strengths, excelling in certain tasks while underperforming in others. To fully harness the diversity of these agents, we propose DEI (Diversity Empowered Intelligence), a framework that leverages their unique expertise. DEI functions as a meta-module atop existing SWE agent frameworks, managing agent collectives for enhanced problem-solving. Experimental results show that a DEI-guided committee of agents is able to surpass the best individual agent's performance by a large margin. For instance, a group of open-source SWE agents, with a maximum individual resolve rate of 27.3% on SWE-Bench Lite, can achieve a 34.3% resolve rate with DEI, making a 25% improvement and beating most closed-source solutions. Our best-performing group excels with a 55% resolve rate, securing the highest ranking on SWE-Bench Lite. Our findings contribute to the growing body of research on collaborative AI systems and their potential to solve complex software engineering challenges. Kexun Zhang, Weiran Yao, Zuxin Liu, Yihao Feng, Zhiwei Liu 0001, Rithesh R. N., Tian Lan 0006, Lei Li 0005, Renze Lou, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Bo Pang 0004, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Shelby Heinecke, Silvio Savarese, Huan Wang 0016, Caiming Xiong |
ICLR | 10 |
| 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models DecodingabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation.However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models.Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest.While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention.In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions.The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process.Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keywordconstrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023). 1 Lifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Caiming Xiong, Yingbo Zhou 0002 |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2023 | EEL: Efficiently Encoding Lattices for RerankingabstractStandard decoding approaches for conditional text generation tasks typically search for an output hypothesis with high model probability, but this may not yield the best hypothesis according to human judgments of quality.Reranking to optimize for downstream metrics can better optimize for quality, but many metrics of interest are computed with pre-trained language models, which are slow to apply to large numbers of hypotheses.We explore an approach for reranking hypotheses by using Transformers to efficiently encode lattices of generated outputs, a method we call EEL.With a single Transformer pass over the entire lattice, we can approximately compute a contextualized representation of each token as if it were only part of a single hypothesis in isolation.We combine this approach with a new class of token-factored rerankers (TFRs) that allow for efficient extraction of high reranker-scoring hypotheses from the lattice.Empirically, our approach incurs minimal degradation error compared to the exponentially slower approach of encoding each hypothesis individually.When applying EEL with TFRs across three text generation tasks, our results show both substantial speedup compared to naive reranking and often better performance on downstream metrics than comparable approaches.1 Prasann Singhal, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Xi Ye 0003, Greg Durrett |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2023 | Understanding Factual Errors in Summarization: Errors, Summarizers, Datasets, Error DetectorsabstractLiyan Tang, Tanya Goyal, Alex Fabbri, Philippe Laban, Jiacheng Xu, Semih Yavuz, Wojciech Kryscinski, Justin Rousseau, Greg Durrett. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023. Liyan Tang, Tanya Goyal, Alexander R. Fabbri, Philippe Laban, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Semih Yavuz, Wojciech Kryscinski, Justin F. Rousseau, Greg Durrett |
ACL (1) | 5 |
| 2023 | Best-k Search Algorithm for Neural Text GenerationabstractModern natural language generation paradigms require a decoding strategy to obtain quality sequences out of the model.Beam search yields high-quality but low diversity outputs; stochastic approaches suffer from high variance and sometimes low quality.In this work, we propose a deterministic search algorithm balancing both quality and diversity.We first investigate the vanilla best-first search (BFS) algorithm and then propose the best-k search algorithm.Inspired by BFS, we greedily expand the top k nodes, instead of the first node, to boost efficiency and diversity.Upweighting recently discovered nodes accompanied by heap pruning ensures the completeness of the search procedure.Experiments on four NLG tasks show that best-k search yields more diverse and natural outputs compared to strong baselines, while our approach maintains high text quality.The proposed algorithm is parameter-free, lightweight, efficient, and easy-to-use.1 Jiacheng Xu 0001, Caiming Xiong, Silvio Savarese, Yingbo Zhou 0002 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2022 | ASPECTNEWS: Aspect-Oriented Summarization of News DocumentsabstractGeneric summaries try to cover an entire document and query-based summaries try to answer document-specific questions.But real users' needs often fall in between these extremes and correspond to aspects, high-level topics discussed among similar types of documents.In this paper, we collect a dataset of realistic aspect-oriented summaries, ASPECT-NEWS, which covers different subtopics about articles in news sub-domains.We annotate data across two domains of articles, earthquakes and fraud investigations, where each article is annotated with two distinct summaries focusing on different aspects for each domain.A system producing a single generic summary cannot concisely satisfy both aspects.Our focus in evaluation is how well existing techniques can generalize to these domains without seeing in-domain training data, so we turn to techniques to construct synthetic training data that have been used in query-focused summarization work.We compare several training schemes that differ in how strongly keywords are used and how oracle summaries are extracted.Our evaluation shows that our final approach yields (a) focused summaries, better than those from a generic summarization system or from keyword matching; (b) a system sensitive to the choice of keywords.1 Ojas Ahuja, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Kevin Horecka, Greg Durrett |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2022 | Massive-scale Decoding for Text Generation using LatticesabstractJiacheng Xu, Siddhartha Jonnalagadda, Greg Durrett. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2022. Jiacheng Xu 0001, Siddhartha Jonnalagadda, Greg Durrett |
NAACL-HLT | 1 |
| 2021 | Dissecting Generation Modes for Abstractive Summarization Models via Ablation and AttributionabstractJiacheng Xu, Greg Durrett. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Jiacheng Xu 0001, Greg Durrett |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Compressive Summarization with Plausibility and Salience ModelingabstractCompressive summarization systems typically rely on a crafted set of syntactic rules to determine what spans of possible summary sentences can be deleted, then learn a model of what to actually delete by optimizing for content selection (ROUGE).In this work, we propose to relax the rigid syntactic constraints on candidate spans and instead leave compression decisions to two data-driven criteria: plausibility and salience.Deleting a span is plausible if removing it maintains the grammaticality and factuality of a sentence, and spans are salient if they contain important information from the summary.Each of these is judged by a pre-trained Transformer model, and only deletions that are both plausible and not salient can be applied.When integrated into a simple extraction-compression pipeline, our method achieves strong in-domain results on benchmark summarization datasets, and human evaluation shows that the plausibility model generally selects for grammatical and factual deletions.Furthermore, the flexibility of our approach allows it to generalize cross-domain: our system fine-tuned on only 500 samples from a new domain can match or exceed an in-domain extractive model trained on much more data.1 Shrey Desai, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Greg Durrett |
EMNLP (1) | 2 |
| 2020 | Understanding Neural Abstractive Summarization Models via UncertaintyabstractAn advantage of seq2seq abstractive summarization models is that they generate text in a free-form manner, but this flexibility makes it difficult to interpret model behavior.In this work, we analyze summarization decoders in both blackbox and whitebox ways by studying on the entropy, or uncertainty, of the model's token-level predictions.For two strong pretrained models, PEGASUS (Zhang et al., 2020) and BART (Lewis et al., 2020) on two summarization datasets, we find a strong correlation between low prediction entropy and where the model copies tokens rather than generating novel text.The decoder's uncertainty also connects to factors like sentence position and syntactic distance between adjacent pairs of tokens, giving a sense of what factors make a context particularly selective for the model's next output token.Finally, we study the relationship of decoder uncertainty and attention behavior to understand how attention gives rise to these observed effects in the model.We show that uncertainty is a useful perspective for analyzing summarization and text generation models more broadly.1 Jiacheng Xu 0001, Shrey Desai, Greg Durrett |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2019 | Neural Extractive Text Summarization with Syntactic CompressionabstractJiacheng Xu, Greg Durrett. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019. Jiacheng Xu 0001, Greg Durrett |
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2018 | Incorporating Discriminator in Sentence Generation: a Gibbs Sampling MethodabstractGenerating plausible and fluent sentence with desired properties has long been a challenge. Most of the recent works use recurrent neural networks (RNNs) and their variants to predict following words given previous sequence and target label. In this paper, we propose a novel framework to generate constrained sentences via Gibbs Sampling. The candidate sentences are revised and updated iteratively, with sampled new words replacing old ones. Our experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed method to generate plausible and diverse sentences. Jinyue Su, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2018 | Spherical Latent Spaces for Stable Variational AutoencodersabstractA hallmark of variational autoencoders (VAEs) for text processing is their combination of powerful encoder-decoder models, such as LSTMs, with simple latent distributions, typically multivariate Gaussians.These models pose a difficult optimization problem: there is an especially bad local optimum where the variational posterior always equals the prior and the model does not use the latent variable at all, a kind of "collapse" which is encouraged by the KL divergence term of the objective.In this work, we experiment with another choice of latent distribution, namely the von Mises-Fisher (vMF) distribution, which places mass on the surface of the unit hypersphere.With this choice of prior and posterior, the KL divergence term now only depends on the variance of the vMF distribution, giving us the ability to treat it as a fixed hyperparameter.We show that doing so not only averts the KL collapse, but consistently gives better likelihoods than Gaussians across a range of modeling conditions, including recurrent language modeling and bag-ofwords document modeling.An analysis of the properties of our vMF representations shows that they learn richer and more nuanced structures in their latent representations than their Gaussian counterparts.1 Jiacheng Xu 0001, Greg Durrett |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2017 | Knowledge Graph Representation with Jointly Structural and Textual EncodingabstractThe objective of knowledge graph embedding is to encode both entities and relations of knowledge graphs into continuous low-dimensional vector spaces. Previously, most works focused on symbolic representation of knowledge graph with structure information, which can not handle new entities or entities with few facts well. In this paper, we propose a novel deep architecture to utilize both structural and textual information of entities. Specifically, we introduce three neural models to encode the valuable information from text description of entity, among which an attentive model can select related information as needed. Then, a gating mechanism is applied to integrate representations of structure and text into a unified architecture. Experiments show that our models outperform baseline and obtain state-of-the-art results on link prediction and triplet classification tasks. Jiacheng Xu 0001, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001 |
IJCAI | 1 |
| 2016 | Cached Long Short-Term Memory Neural Networks for Document-Level Sentiment ClassificationabstractRecently, neural networks have achieved great success on sentiment classification due to their ability to alleviate feature engineering.However, one of the remaining challenges is to model long texts in document-level sentiment classification under a recurrent architecture because of the deficiency of the memory unit.To address this problem, we present a Cached Long Short-Term Memory neural networks (CLSTM) to capture the overall semantic information in long texts.CLSTM introduces a cache mechanism, which divides memory into several groups with different forgetting rates and thus enables the network to keep sentiment information better within a recurrent unit.The proposed CLSTM outperforms the state-of-the-art models on three publicly available document-level sentiment analysis datasets. Jiacheng Xu 0001, Danlu Chen, Xipeng Qiu, Xuanjing Huang 0001 |
EMNLP | 1 |