Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jiacheng Xu 0003
dblp:188/6025-3
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
1as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-4315-6976ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 53% Language models and text generation · 19% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 11% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning
off-dynamics reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ODRL: A Benchmark for Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning from human feedback › preference-based reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from AI feedback |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation › automatic evaluation
self-evaluation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-improvement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | ODRL: A Benchmark for Off-Dynamics Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning
visual reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Focus-Then-Decide: Segmentation-Assisted Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Internal Logical Induction for Pixel-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › deep reinforcement learning › visual reinforcement learning
pixel-based reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Internal Logical Induction for Pixel-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning · KDD 2023 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
rule learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Internal Logical Induction for Pixel-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning · KDD 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › hyperparameter optimization
dynamic algorithm configuration |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-agent reinforcement learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › logic-based reasoning
propositional logic |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Internal Logical Induction for Pixel-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning · KDD 2023 |
Mathematical optimization › black-box optimization
algorithm configuration |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
multi-objective optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm Configuration · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
self-supervised learning · 0.8self-evaluation · 0.8reinforcement learning · 0.8foundational segmentation model · 0.8dynamics adaptation · 0.8domain randomization · 0.8attention mechanism · 0.8rule learning · 0.7reward shaping · 0.7deep reinforcement learning · 0.7cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning · 0.6contextual multi-agent markov decision process · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning Contemplation without External SupervisionabstractLanguage model self-improvement (LMSI) techniques have recently gained significant attention as they improve language models without requiring external supervision. A notable approach is reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF), which trains a reward model based on AI preference data and employs reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm to train the language model. However, RLAIF relies on a heuristic assumption that the AI model is able to provide effective feedback, which requires the language model to possess solid capability. In this paper, we present a novel LMSI method, Reinforcement Learning Contemplation (RLC). We disclose that it is simpler for language models to evaluate the text than to generate it, even for small models under 1B parameters. Leveraging the gap between the evaluation and generation, RLC evaluates the generated answers and updates language model using RL to maximize self-evaluation scores. We demonstrate the effectiveness of RLC on a wide range of challenging tasks, including reasoning, summarization, conditioned generation and emotion recognition, resulting in a increase in the answering accuracy (31.23% to 37.09%) for BigBench-hard reasoning tasks, and a rise in BERTScore for CNN/Daily Mail summarization tasks. In addition, RLC can be applied to models of different sizes (80M to 3B) and model structures (FLAN-T5, LLAMA-3.2 and QWEN-2.5), showcasing its broad applicability. We further verify that when training on larger scale of dataset, RLC improves language model’s evaluation and generation ability on unseen tasks simultaneously, enabling a general capability improvement without external supervision. Jing-Cheng Pang, Xiong-Hui Chen, Jiacheng Xu 0003, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu 0001 |
J. Artif. Intell. Res. | 5 |
| 2025 | Focus-Then-Reuse: Fast Adaptation in Visual Perturbation EnvironmentsabstractVisual reinforcement learning has shown promise in various real-world applications. However, deploying policies in complex real-world environments with visual perturbations remains a significant challenge. We notice that humans tend to filter information at the object level prior to decision-making, facilitating efficient skill transfer across different contexts. Inspired by this, we introduce Focus-Then-Reuse (FTR), a method utilizing a novel object selection mechanism to focus on task-relevant objects, and directly reuse the simulation-trained policy on them. The training of the object selection mechanism integrates prior knowledge from a vision-language model and feedback from the environment. Experimental results on challenging tasks based on DeepMind Control Suite and Franka Emika Robotics demonstrate that FTR enables rapid adaptation in visual perturbation environments and achieves state-of-the-art performance. The source code is available at https://github.com/LAMDA-RL/FTR. Chao Chen 0028, Jiacheng Xu 0003, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Focus-Then-Decide: Segmentation-Assisted Reinforcement LearningabstractVisual Reinforcement Learning (RL) is a promising approach to achieve human-like intelligence. However, it currently faces challenges in learning efficiently within noisy environments. In contrast, humans can quickly identify task-relevant objects in distraction-filled surroundings by applying previously acquired common knowledge. Recently, foundational models in natural language processing and computer vision have achieved remarkable successes, and the common knowledge within these models can significantly benefit downstream task training. Inspired by these achievements, we aim to incorporate common knowledge from foundational models into visual RL. We propose a novel Focus-Then-Decide (FTD) framework, allowing the agent to make decisions based solely on task-relevant objects. To achieve this, we introduce an attention mechanism to select task-relevant objects from the object set returned by a foundational segmentation model, and only use the task-relevant objects for the subsequent training of the decision module. Additionally, we specifically employed two generic self-supervised objectives to facilitate the rapid learning of this attention mechanism. Experimental results on challenging tasks based on DeepMind Control Suite and Franka Emika Robotics demonstrate that our method can quickly and accurately pinpoint objects of interest in noisy environments. Consequently, it achieves a significant performance improvement over current state-of-the-art algorithms. Project Page: https://www.lamda.nju.edu.cn/chenc/FTD.html Code: https://github.com/LAMDA-RL/FTD Chao Chen 0028, Jiacheng Xu 0003, Weijian Liao, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu 0001 |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2024 | Language Model Self-improvement by Reinforcement Learning ContemplationabstractLanguage model self-improvement (LMSI) techniques have recently gained significant attention as they improve language models without requiring external supervision. A common approach is reinforcement learning from AI feedback (RLAIF), which trains a reward model based on AI preference data and employs a reinforcement learning algorithm to train the language model.
However, RLAIF relies on the heuristic assumption that an AI model can provide effective feedback and correct wrong answers, requiring a solid capability of the language model. This paper presents a novel LMSI method, Reinforcement Learning Contemplation (RLC). We disclose that it is simpler for language models to evaluate a sentence than to generate it, even for small language models. Leveraging the gap between the evaluation and generation, RLC evaluates generated answers and updates language model parameters using reinforcement learning to maximize evaluation scores. Through testing on various challenging reasoning tasks and text summarization task, our experiments show that RLC effectively improves language model performance without external supervision, resulting in an answering accuracy increase (from 31.23% to 37.09%) for BigBench-hard reasoning tasks, and a rise in BERTScore for CNN/Daily Mail summarization tasks. Furthermore, RLC can be applied to models of different sizes, showcasing its broad applicability. Jing-Cheng Pang, Xiong-Hui Chen, Jiacheng Xu 0003, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu 0001 |
ICLR | 5 |
| 2024 | ODRL: A Benchmark for Off-Dynamics Reinforcement LearningabstractWe consider off-dynamics reinforcement learning (RL) where one needs to transfer policies across different domains with dynamics mismatch. Despite the focus on developing dynamics-aware algorithms, this field is hindered due to the lack of a standard benchmark. To bridge this gap, we introduce ODRL, the first benchmark tailored for evaluating off-dynamics RL methods. ODRL contains four experimental settings where the source and target domains can be either online or offline, and provides diverse tasks and a broad spectrum of dynamics shifts, making it a reliable platform to comprehensively evaluate the agent's adaptation ability to the target domain. Furthermore, ODRL includes recent off-dynamics RL algorithms in a unified framework and introduces some extra baselines for different settings, all implemented in a single-file manner. To unpack the true adaptation capability of existing methods, we conduct extensive benchmarking experiments, which show that no method has universal advantages across varied dynamics shifts. We hope this benchmark can serve as a cornerstone for future research endeavors. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/OffDynamicsRL/off-dynamics-rl. Jiafei Lyu, Jiacheng Xu 0003, Mengbei Yan, Zongzhang Zhang, Chenjia Bai, Zongqing Lu 0002, Xiu Li 0001 |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | Internal Logical Induction for Pixel-Symbolic Reinforcement LearningabstractReinforcement Learning (RL) has experienced rapid advancements in recent years. The widely studied RL algorithms mainly focus on a single input form, such as pixel-based image input or symbolic vector input. These two forms have different characteristics and, in many scenarios, will appear together, while few RL algorithms have studied the problems with mixed input types. Specifically, in the scenario where both pixel and symbolic inputs are available, symbolic input usually offers abstract features with specific semantics, which is more conducive to the agent's focus. Conversely, pixel input provides more comprehensive information, enabling the agent to make well-informed decisions. Tailoring the processing approach based on the properties of these two input types can contribute to solving the problem more effectively. To tackle the above issue, we propose an Internal Logical Induction (ILI) framework that integrates deep RL and rule learning into one system. ILI utilizes the deep RL algorithm to process the pixel input and the rule learning algorithm to induce propositional logic knowledge from symbolic input. To efficiently combine these two mechanisms, we further adopt a reward shaping technique by treating valuable knowledge as intrinsic rewards for the RL procedure. Experimental results demonstrate that the ILI framework outperforms baseline approaches in RL problems with pixel-symbolic input, and its inductive knowledge exhibits transferability advantages when pixel input semantics change. Jiacheng Xu 0003, Chao Chen 0028, Fuxiang Zhang, Lei Yuan 0005, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu 0001 |
KDD | 1 |
| 2022 | Multi-agent Dynamic Algorithm ConfigurationabstractAutomated algorithm configuration relieves users from tedious, trial-and-error tuning tasks. A popular algorithm configuration tuning paradigm is dynamic algorithm configuration (DAC), in which an agent learns dynamic configuration policies across instances by reinforcement learning (RL). However, in many complex algorithms, there may exist different types of configuration hyperparameters, and such heterogeneity may bring difficulties for classic DAC which uses a single-agent RL policy. In this paper, we aim to address this issue and propose multi-agent DAC (MA-DAC), with one agent working for one type of configuration hyperparameter. MA-DAC formulates the dynamic configuration of a complex algorithm with multiple types of hyperparameters as a contextual multi-agent Markov decision process and solves it by a cooperative multi-agent RL (MARL) algorithm. To instantiate, we apply MA-DAC to a well-known optimization algorithm for multi-objective optimization problems. Experimental results show the effectiveness of MA-DAC in not only achieving superior performance compared with other configuration tuning approaches based on heuristic rules, multi-armed bandits, and single-agent RL, but also being capable of generalizing to different problem classes. Furthermore, we release the environments in this paper as a benchmark for testing MARL algorithms, with the hope of facilitating the application of MARL. Ke Xue 0001, Jiacheng Xu 0003, Lei Yuan 0005, Miqing Li, Chao Qian 0001, Zongzhang Zhang, Yang Yu 0001 |
NeurIPS | 2 |