Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Giovanni Sutanto

dblp:188/6401 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot manipulation · 49% Motion planning and robot control · 35% Robot navigation and mapping · 16%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation › tactile sensing › tactile feedback control
tactile servoing
0.412019
Learning Latent Space Dynamics for Tactile Servoing · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot learning
movement primitives
0.312018
Learning Sensor Feedback Models from Demonstrations via Phase-Modulated Neural Networks · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation
learning from demonstration
0.312017
Learning feedback terms for reactive planning and control · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
obstacle avoidance
0.312017
Learning feedback terms for reactive planning and control · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
reactive control
0.312017
Learning feedback terms for reactive planning and control · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Robot manipulation
dexterous manipulation
0.112019
Learning Latent Space Dynamics for Tactile Servoing · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing
0.112018
Learning Sensor Feedback Models from Demonstrations via Phase-Modulated Neural Networks · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

radial basis function network · 0.7learning from demonstration · 0.7manifold learning · 0.4neural network · 0.3dynamic movement primitives · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Learning Latent Space Dynamics for Tactile Servoing
abstract
To achieve a dexterous robotic manipulation, we need to endow our robot with tactile feedback capability, i.e. the ability to drive action based on tactile sensing. In this paper, we specifically address the challenge of tactile servoing, i.e. given the current tactile sensing and a target/goal tactile sensing - memorized from a successful task execution in the past - what is the action that will bring the current tactile sensing to move closer towards the target tactile sensing at the next time step. We develop a data-driven approach to acquire a dynamics model for tactile servoing by learning from demonstration. Moreover, our method represents the tactile sensing information as to lie on a surface - or a 2D manifold - and perform a manifold learning, making it applicable to any tactile skin geometry. We evaluate our method on a contact point tracking task using a robot equipped with a tactile finger.
Giovanni Sutanto, Nathan D. Ratliff, Balakumar Sundaralingam, Yevgen Chebotar, Ankur Handa, Dieter Fox
ICRA1
2018 Learning Sensor Feedback Models from Demonstrations via Phase-Modulated Neural Networks
abstract
In order to robustly execute a task under environmental uncertainty, a robot needs to be able to reactively adapt to changes arising in its environment. The environment changes are usually reflected in deviation from expected sensory traces. These deviations in sensory traces can be used to drive the motion adaptation, and for this purpose, a feedback model is required. The feedback model maps the deviations in sensory traces to the motion plan adaptation. In this paper, we develop a general data-driven framework for learning a feedback model from demonstrations. We utilize a variant of a radial basis function network structure -with movement phases as kernel centers- which can generally be applied to represent any feedback models for movement primitives. To demonstrate the effectiveness of our framework, we test it on the task of scraping on a tilt board. In this task, we are learning a reactive policy in the form of orientation adaptation, based on deviations of tactile sensor traces. As a proof of concept of our method, we provide evaluations on an anthropomorphic robot.
Giovanni Sutanto, Stefan Schaal, Franziska Meier
ICRA1
2017 Learning feedback terms for reactive planning and control
abstract
With the advancement of robotics, machine learning, and machine perception, increasingly more robots will enter human environments to assist with daily tasks. However, dynamically-changing human environments requires reactive motion plans. Reactivity can be accomplished through re-planning, e.g. model-predictive control, or through a reactive feedback policy that modifies on-going behavior in response to sensory events. In this paper, we investigate how to use machine learning to add reactivity to a previously learned nominal skilled behavior. We approach this by learning a reactive modification term for movement plans represented by nonlinear differential equations. In particular, we use dynamic movement primitives (DMPs) to represent a skill and a neural network to learn a reactive policy from human demonstrations. We use the well explored domain of obstacle avoidance for robot manipulation as a test bed. Our approach demonstrates how a neural network can be combined with physical insights to ensure robust behavior across different obstacle settings and movement durations. Evaluations on an anthropomorphic robotic system demonstrate the effectiveness of our work.
Akshara Rai, Giovanni Sutanto, Stefan Schaal, Franziska Meier
ICRA2