Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dennis Basgier
dblp:188/7230
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visualization and visual analytics · 67% Image and video processing · 33% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Visualization and visual analytics
medical visualization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016 |
Image and video processing › image segmentation
segmentation evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016 |
Visualization and visual analytics
visual comparison |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016 |
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › medical image analysis › medical image segmentation
3d medical image segmentation |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based Algorithms · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
statistical shape model · 0.5hierarchical clustering · 0.5connectivity criterion · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Comparative Local Quality Assessment of 3D Medical Image Segmentations with Focus on Statistical Shape Model-Based AlgorithmsabstractThe quality of automatic 3D medical segmentation algorithms needs to be assessed on test datasets comprising several 3D images (i.e., instances of an organ). The experts need to compare the segmentation quality across the dataset in order to detect systematic segmentation problems. However, such comparative evaluation is not supported well by current methods. We present a novel system for assessing and comparing segmentation quality in a dataset with multiple 3D images. The data is analyzed and visualized in several views. We detect and show regions with systematic segmentation quality characteristics. For this purpose, we extended a hierarchical clustering algorithm with a connectivity criterion. We combine quality values across the dataset for determining regions with characteristic segmentation quality across instances. Using our system, the experts can also identify 3D segmentations with extraordinary quality characteristics. While we focus on algorithms based on statistical shape models, our approach can also be applied to cases, where landmark correspondences among instances can be established. We applied our approach to three real datasets: liver, cochlea and facial nerve. The segmentation experts were able to identify organ regions with systematic segmentation characteristics as well as to detect outlier instances. Tatiana von Landesberger, Dennis Basgier, Meike Becker |
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. | 2 |