Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Shruti Rijhwani

dblp:188/9080 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
16ranked-venue papers
6as first author
6since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 16 · 6 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
10 papers
Information extraction and text analysis · 53% Language models and text generation · 21% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 12%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Web and social media mining · 100%

Topics — the 18 heaviest of 20, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
named entity recognition
1.432022
MasakhaNER 2.0: Africa-centric Transfer Learning for Named Entity Recognition · EMNLP 2022
Soft Gazetteers for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition · ACL 2020
Temporally-Informed Analysis of Named Entity Recognition · ACL 2020
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
cross-lingual transfer
1.022022
MasakhaNER 2.0: Africa-centric Transfer Learning for Named Entity Recognition · EMNLP 2022
Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learning · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
summarization evaluation
0.712023
SEAHORSE: A Multilingual, Multifaceted Dataset for Summarization Evaluation · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › entity linking
cross-lingual entity linking
0.522020
Zero-Shot Neural Transfer for Cross-Lingual Entity Linking · AAAI 2019
Soft Gazetteers for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › morphological analysis
morphosyntactic analysis
0.512021
Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
text generation evaluation
0.512021
Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts · EMNLP (1) 2021
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › named entity recognition
low-resource named entity recognition
0.412020
Soft Gazetteers for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition · ACL 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › text recognition
optical character recognition
0.412020
OCR Post Correction for Endangered Language Texts · EMNLP (1) 2020
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › text recognition › optical character recognition
Post-OCR correction
0.412020
OCR Post Correction for Endangered Language Texts · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
entity linking
0.412019
Zero-Shot Neural Transfer for Cross-Lingual Entity Linking · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › speech analysis
language identification
0.312017
Estimating Code-Switching on Twitter with a Novel Generalized Word-Level Language Detection Technique · ACL (1) 2017
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sentiment analysis › sentiment classification
cross-lingual sentiment classification
0.212016
Understanding Language Preference for Expression of Opinion and Sentiment: What do Hindi-English Speakers do on Twitter? · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.212016
Understanding Language Preference for Expression of Opinion and Sentiment: What do Hindi-English Speakers do on Twitter? · EMNLP 2016
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text summarization
summarization datasets
0.212023
SEAHORSE: A Multilingual, Multifaceted Dataset for Summarization Evaluation · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multilingual language models
0.212022
MasakhaNER 2.0: Africa-centric Transfer Learning for Named Entity Recognition · EMNLP 2022
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
multilingual NLP
0.112019
Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learning · ACL (1) 2019
Web and social media mining › social media analysis
social media text analysis
0.112017
Estimating Code-Switching on Twitter with a Novel Generalized Word-Level Language Detection Technique · ACL (1) 2017
Computational social science and digital humanities
social media analysis
0.112016
Understanding Language Preference for Expression of Opinion and Sentiment: What do Hindi-English Speakers do on Twitter? · EMNLP 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

transfer learning · 0.6multilingual pretraining · 0.6morphosyntactic well-formedness metrics · 0.5temporal modeling · 0.4neural named entity recognition · 0.4cross-lingual entity linking · 0.4OCR post-correction · 0.4transfer language selection · 0.4pivot-based learning · 0.4neural transfer · 0.4generalized word-level language detection · 0.3text classification · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 SEAHORSE: A Multilingual, Multifaceted Dataset for Summarization Evaluation
abstract
Elizabeth Clark, Shruti Rijhwani, Sebastian Gehrmann, Joshua Maynez, Roee Aharoni, Vitaly Nikolaev, Thibault Sellam, Aditya Siddhant, Dipanjan Das, Ankur Parikh. Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2023.
Elizabeth Clark, Shruti Rijhwani, Sebastian Gehrmann, Joshua Maynez, Roee Aharoni, Vitaly Nikolaev, Thibault Sellam, Aditya Siddhant, Dipanjan Das 0001, Ankur P. Parikh
EMNLP2
2022 MasakhaNER 2.0: Africa-centric Transfer Learning for Named Entity Recognition
abstract
David Adelani, Graham Neubig, Sebastian Ruder, Shruti Rijhwani, Michael Beukman, Chester Palen-Michel, Constantine Lignos, Jesujoba Alabi, Shamsuddeen Muhammad, Peter Nabende, Cheikh M. Bamba Dione, Andiswa Bukula, Rooweither Mabuya, Bonaventure F. P. Dossou, Blessing Sibanda, Happy Buzaaba, Jonathan Mukiibi, Godson Kalipe, Derguene Mbaye, Amelia Taylor, Fatoumata Kabore, Chris Chinenye Emezue, Anuoluwapo Aremu, Perez Ogayo, Catherine Gitau, Edwin Munkoh-Buabeng, Victoire Memdjokam Koagne, Allahsera Auguste Tapo, Tebogo Macucwa, Vukosi Marivate, Mboning Tchiaze Elvis, Tajuddeen Gwadabe, Tosin Adewumi, Orevaoghene Ahia, Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende, Neo Lerato Mokono, Ignatius Ezeani, Chiamaka Chukwuneke, Mofetoluwa Oluwaseun Adeyemi, Gilles Quentin Hacheme, Idris Abdulmumin, Odunayo Ogundepo, Oreen Yousuf, Tatiana Moteu, Dietrich Klakow. Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2022.
David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Graham Neubig, Sebastian Ruder, Shruti Rijhwani, Michael Beukman, Chester Palen-Michel, Constantine Lignos, Jesujoba O. Alabi, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Peter Nabende, Cheikh M. Bamba Dione, Andiswa Bukula, Rooweither Mabuya, Bonaventure F. P. Dossou, Blessing K. Sibanda, Happy Buzaaba, Jonathan Mukiibi, Godson Kalipe, Derguene Mbaye, Amelia V. Taylor, Fatoumata Ouoba Kabore, Chris C. Emezue, Aremu Anuoluwapo, Perez Ogayo, Catherine Gitau, Edwin Munkoh-Buabeng, Victoire Memdjokam Koagne, Allahsera Tapo, Tebogo Macucwa, Vukosi Marivate, Elvis Mboning, Tajuddeen Rabiu Gwadabe, Tosin P. Adewumi, Orevaoghene Ahia, Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende, Neo L. Mokono, Ignatius Ezeani, Chiamaka Ijeoma Chukwuneke, Mofe Adeyemi, Gilles Hacheme, Idris Abdulmumin, Odunayo Ogundepo, Oreen Yousuf, Tatiana Moteu Ngoli, Dietrich Klakow
EMNLP4
2021 Dependency Induction Through the Lens of Visual Perception
abstract
Most previous work on grammar induction focuses on learning phrasal or dependency structure purely from text.However, because the signal provided by text alone is limited, recently introduced visually grounded syntax models make use of multimodal information leading to improved performance in constituency grammar induction.However, as compared to dependency grammars, constituency grammars do not provide a straightforward way to incorporate visual information without enforcing language-specific heuristics.In this paper, we propose an unsupervised grammar induction model that leverages word concreteness and a structural vision-based heuristic to jointly learn constituency-structure and dependency-structure grammars.Our experiments find that concreteness is a strong indicator for learning dependency grammars, improving the direct attachment score (DAS) by over 50% as compared to state-of-the-art models trained on pure text.Next, we propose an extension of our model that leverages both word concreteness and visual semantic role labels in constituency and dependency parsing.Our experiments show that the proposed extension outperforms the current state-of-the-art visually grounded models in constituency parsing even with a smaller grammar size. 1
Ruisi Su, Shruti Rijhwani, Hao Zhu 0011, Junxian He, Yonatan Bisk, Graham Neubig
CoNLL2
2021 Evaluating the Morphosyntactic Well-formedness of Generated Texts
abstract
Adithya Pratapa, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Shruti Rijhwani, Aditi Chaudhary, David R. Mortensen, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021.
Adithya Pratapa, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Shruti Rijhwani, Aditi Chaudhary, David R. Mortensen, Graham Neubig, Yulia Tsvetkov
EMNLP (1)3
2021 MasakhaNER: Named Entity Recognition for African Languages
abstract
Abstract We take a step towards addressing the under- representation of the African continent in NLP research by bringing together different stakeholders to create the first large, publicly available, high-quality dataset for named entity recognition (NER) in ten African languages. We detail the characteristics of these languages to help researchers and practitioners better understand the challenges they pose for NER tasks. We analyze our datasets and conduct an extensive empirical evaluation of state- of-the-art methods across both supervised and transfer learning settings. Finally, we release the data, code, and models to inspire future research on African NLP.1
David Ifeoluwa Adelani, Jade Z. Abbott, Graham Neubig, Daniel D'souza, Julia Kreutzer, Constantine Lignos, Chester Palen-Michel, Happy Buzaaba, Shruti Rijhwani, Sebastian Ruder, Stephen Mayhew 0002, Israel Abebe Azime, Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad, Chris C. Emezue, Joyce Nakatumba-Nabende, Perez Ogayo, Aremu Anuoluwapo, Catherine Gitau, Derguene Mbaye, Jesujoba O. Alabi, Seid Muhie Yimam, Tajuddeen Rabiu Gwadabe, Ignatius Ezeani, Rubungo Andre Niyongabo, Jonathan Mukiibi, Verrah Otiende, Iroro Orife, Davis David, Samba Ngom, Tosin P. Adewumi, Paul Rayson, Mofe Adeyemi, Gerald Muriuki, Emmanuel Anebi, Chiamaka Ijeoma Chukwuneke, Nkiruka Odu, Eric Peter Wairagala, Samuel Oyerinde, Clemencia Siro, Tobius Saul Bateesa, Temilola Oloyede, Yvonne Wambui, Victor Akinode, Deborah Nabagereka, Maurice Katusiime, Ayodele Awokoya, Mouhamadane Mboup, Dibora Gebreyohannes, Henok Tilaye, Kelechi Nwaike, Degaga Wolde, Abdoulaye Faye, Blessing K. Sibanda, Orevaoghene Ahia, Bonaventure F. P. Dossou, Kelechi Ogueji, Thierno Ibrahima Diop, Abdoulaye Diallo, Adewale Akinfaderin, Tendai Marengereke, Salomey Osei
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics9
2021 Lexically Aware Semi-Supervised Learning for OCR Post-Correction
abstract
Abstract Much of the existing linguistic data in many languages of the world is locked away in non- digitized books and documents. Optical character recognition (OCR) can be used to produce digitized text, and previous work has demonstrated the utility of neural post-correction methods that improve the results of general- purpose OCR systems on recognition of less- well-resourced languages. However, these methods rely on manually curated post- correction data, which are relatively scarce compared to the non-annotated raw images that need to be digitized. In this paper, we present a semi-supervised learning method that makes it possible to utilize these raw images to improve performance, specifically through the use of self-training, a technique where a model is iteratively trained on its own outputs. In addition, to enforce consistency in the recognized vocabulary, we introduce a lexically aware decoding method that augments the neural post-correction model with a count-based language model constructed from the recognized texts, implemented using weighted finite-state automata (WFSA) for efficient and effective decoding. Results on four endangered languages demonstrate the utility of the proposed method, with relative error reductions of 15%–29%, where we find the combination of self-training and lexically aware decoding essential for achieving consistent improvements.1
Shruti Rijhwani, Daisy Rosenblum, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Graham Neubig
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics1
2020 Temporally-Informed Analysis of Named Entity Recognition
abstract
Natural language processing models often have to make predictions on text data that evolves over time as a result of changes in language use or the information described in the text. However, evaluation results on existing data sets are seldom reported by taking the timestamp of the document into account. We analyze and propose methods that make better use of temporally-diverse training data, with a focus on the task of named entity recognition. To support these experiments, we introduce a novel data set of English tweets annotated with named entities. We empirically demonstrate the effect of temporal drift on performance, and how the temporal information of documents can be used to obtain better models compared to those that disregard temporal information. Our analysis gives insights into why this information is useful, in the hope of informing potential avenues of improvement for named entity recognition as well as other NLP tasks under similar experimental setups.
Shruti Rijhwani, Daniel Preotiuc-Pietro
ACL1
2020 Soft Gazetteers for Low-Resource Named Entity Recognition
abstract
Traditional named entity recognition models use gazetteers (lists of entities) as features to improve performance.Although modern neural network models do not require such handcrafted features for strong performance, recent work (Wu et al., 2018) has demonstrated their utility for named entity recognition on English data.However, designing such features for low-resource languages is challenging, because exhaustive entity gazetteers do not exist in these languages.To address this problem, we propose a method of "soft gazetteers" that incorporates ubiquitously available information from English knowledge bases, such as Wikipedia, into neural named entity recognition models through cross-lingual entity linking.Our experiments on four low-resource languages show an average improvement of 4 points in F1 score. 1
Shruti Rijhwani, Shuyan Zhou, Graham Neubig, Jaime G. Carbonell
ACL1
2020 OCR Post Correction for Endangered Language Texts
abstract
There is little to no data available to build natural language processing models for most endangered languages.However, textual data in these languages often exists in formats that are not machine-readable, such as paper books and scanned images.In this work, we address the task of extracting text from these resources.We create a benchmark dataset of transcriptions for scanned books in three critically endangered languages and present a systematic analysis of how general-purpose OCR tools are not robust to the data-scarce setting of endangered languages.We develop an OCR postcorrection method tailored to ease training in this data-scarce setting, reducing the recognition error rate by 34% on average across the three languages.1
Shruti Rijhwani, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Graham Neubig
EMNLP (1)1
2020 AlloVera: A Multilingual Allophone Database
abstract
We introduce a new resource, AlloVera, which provides mappings from 218 allophones to phonemes for 14 languages. Phonemes are contrastive phonological units, and allophones are their various concrete realizations, which are predictable from phonological context. While phonemic representations are language specific, phonetic representations (stated in terms of (allo)phones) are much closer to a universal (language-independent) transcription. AlloVera allows the training of speech recognition models that output phonetic transcriptions in the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA), regardless of the input language. We show that a “universal” allophone model, Allosaurus, built with AlloVera, outperforms “universal” phonemic models and language-specific models on a speech-transcription task. We explore the implications of this technology (and related technologies) for the documentation of endangered and minority languages. We further explore other applications for which AlloVera will be suitable as it grows, including phonological typology.
David R. Mortensen, Patrick Littell, Alexis Michaud, Shruti Rijhwani, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Alan W. Black, Florian Metze, Graham Neubig
LREC5
2020 Improving Candidate Generation for Low-resource Cross-lingual Entity Linking
abstract
Cross-lingual entity linking (XEL) is the task of finding referents in a target-language knowledge base (KB) for mentions extracted from source-language texts. The first step of (X)EL is candidate generation, which retrieves a list of plausible candidate entities from the target-language KB for each mention. Approaches based on resources from Wikipedia have proven successful in the realm of relatively high-resource languages, but these do not extend well to low-resource languages with few, if any, Wikipedia pages. Recently, transfer learning methods have been shown to reduce the demand for resources in the low-resource languages by utilizing resources in closely related languages, but the performance still lags far behind their high-resource counterparts. In this paper, we first assess the problems faced by current entity candidate generation methods for low-resource XEL, then propose three improvements that (1) reduce the disconnect between entity mentions and KB entries, and (2) improve the robustness of the model to low-resource scenarios. The methods are simple, but effective: We experiment with our approach on seven XEL datasets and find that they yield an average gain of 16.9% in Top-30 gold candidate recall, compared with state-of-the-art baselines. Our improved model also yields an average gain of 7.9% in in-KB accuracy of end-to-end XEL. 1
Shuyan Zhou, Shruti Rijhwani, John Wieting, Jaime G. Carbonell, Graham Neubig
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2019 Zero-Shot Neural Transfer for Cross-Lingual Entity Linking
abstract
Cross-lingual entity linking maps an entity mention in a source language to its corresponding entry in a structured knowledge base that is in a different (target) language. While previous work relies heavily on bilingual lexical resources to bridge the gap between the source and the target languages, these resources are scarce or unavailable for many low-resource languages. To address this problem, we investigate zero-shot cross-lingual entity linking, in which we assume no bilingual lexical resources are available in the source low-resource language. Specifically, we propose pivot-basedentity linking, which leverages information from a highresource “pivot” language to train character-level neural entity linking models that are transferred to the source lowresource language in a zero-shot manner. With experiments on 9 low-resource languages and transfer through a total of54 languages, we show that our proposed pivot-based framework improves entity linking accuracy 17% (absolute) on average over the baseline systems, for the zero-shot scenario.1 Further, we also investigate the use of language-universal phonological representations which improves average accuracy (absolute) by 36% when transferring between languages that use different scripts.
Shruti Rijhwani, Jiateng Xie, Graham Neubig, Jaime G. Carbonell
AAAI1
2019 Choosing Transfer Languages for Cross-Lingual Learning
abstract
Yu-Hsiang Lin, Chian-Yu Chen, Jean Lee, Zirui Li, Yuyan Zhang, Mengzhou Xia, Shruti Rijhwani, Junxian He, Zhisong Zhang, Xuezhe Ma, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Patrick Littell, Graham Neubig. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 2019.
Yu-Hsiang Lin, Chian-Yu Chen, Jean Lee, Mengzhou Xia, Shruti Rijhwani, Junxian He, Zhisong Zhang, Xuezhe Ma, Antonios Anastasopoulos, Patrick Littell, Graham Neubig
ACL (1)7
2018 Parser combinators for Tigrinya and Oromo morphology
Patrick Littell, Tom McCoy 0001, Na-Rae Han, Shruti Rijhwani, Zaid Sheikh, David R. Mortensen, Teruko Mitamura, Lori S. Levin
LREC4
2017 Estimating Code-Switching on Twitter with a Novel Generalized Word-Level Language Detection Technique
abstract
Shruti Rijhwani, Royal Sequiera, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, Chandra Shekhar Maddila. Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2017.
Shruti Rijhwani, Royal Sequiera, Monojit Choudhury, Kalika Bali, Chandra Shekhar Maddila
ACL (1)1
2016 Understanding Language Preference for Expression of Opinion and Sentiment: What do Hindi-English Speakers do on Twitter?
abstract
Linguistic research on multilingual societies has indicated that there is usually a preferred language for expression of emotion and sentiment (Dewaele, 2010).Paucity of data has limited such studies to participant interviews and speech transcriptions from small groups of speakers.In this paper, we report a study on 430,000 unique tweets from Indian users, specifically Hindi-English bilinguals, to understand the language of preference, if any, for expressing opinion and sentiment.To this end, we develop classifiers for opinion detection in these languages, and further classifying opinionated tweets into positive, negative and neutral sentiments.Our study indicates that Hindi (i.e., the native language) is preferred over English for expression of negative opinion and swearing.As an aside, we explore some common pragmatic functions of codeswitching through sentiment detection.* * This work was done when the author was a Research Fellow at Microsoft Research Lab India.1 Although some linguists differentiate between Codeswitching and Code-mixing, this paper will use the two terms interchangeably.
Koustav Rudra, Shruti Rijhwani, Rafiya Begum, Kalika Bali, Monojit Choudhury, Niloy Ganguly
EMNLP2