VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Vania Fang
dblp:189/0091
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
3 papers |
Storage systems · 91% Parallel and multicore computing · 6% Performance modeling and evaluation · 4% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Operating systems · 50% Compilers and program optimization · 50% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Storage systems
flash and SSD |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | I/O in a Flash: Evolution of ONTAP to Low-Latency SSDs · FAST 2024 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › SSD performance
low-latency SSD |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | I/O in a Flash: Evolution of ONTAP to Low-Latency SSDs · FAST 2024 |
Storage systems › storage architecture
enterprise storage |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Empirical Evaluation and Enhancement of Enterprise Storage System Request Scheduling · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Storage systems › flash and SSD › flash memory
flash storage |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Empirical Evaluation and Enhancement of Enterprise Storage System Request Scheduling · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Operating systems › resource management › storage management
file systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | To Waffinity and Beyond: A Scalable Architecture for Incremental Parallelization of File System Code · OSDI 2016 |
Compilers and program optimization
parallelization |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | To Waffinity and Beyond: A Scalable Architecture for Incremental Parallelization of File System Code · OSDI 2016 |
Storage systems
file systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | I/O in a Flash: Evolution of ONTAP to Low-Latency SSDs · FAST 2024 |
Performance modeling and evaluation
workload characterization |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Empirical Evaluation and Enhancement of Enterprise Storage System Request Scheduling · ACM Trans. Storage 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallelization strategies
incremental parallelization |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | To Waffinity and Beyond: A Scalable Architecture for Incremental Parallelization of File System Code · OSDI 2016 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallel programming models |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | To Waffinity and Beyond: A Scalable Architecture for Incremental Parallelization of File System Code · OSDI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
trace-driven simulation · 0.3analytical modeling · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | I/O in a Flash: Evolution of ONTAP to Low-Latency SSDs
Matthew Curtis-Maury, Ram Kesavan, Bharadwaj V. R., Nikhil Mattankot, Vania Fang, Yash Trivedi, Kesari Mishra |
FAST | 5 |
| 2018 | Empirical Evaluation and Enhancement of Enterprise Storage System Request SchedulingabstractSince little has been reported in the literature concerning enterprise storage system file-level request scheduling, we do not have enough knowledge about how various scheduling factors affect performance. Moreover, we are in lack of a good understanding on how to enhance request scheduling to adapt to the changing characteristics of workloads and hardware resources. To answer these questions, we first build a request scheduler prototype based on WAFL®, a mainstream file system running on numerous enterprise storage systems worldwide. Next, we use the prototype to quantitatively measure the impact of various scheduling configurations on performance on a NetApp®'s enterprise-class storage system. Several observations have been made. For example, we discover that in order to improve performance, the priority of write requests and non-preempted restarted requests should be boosted in some workloads. Inspired by these observations, we further propose two scheduling enhancement heuristics called SORD (size-oriented request dispatching) and QATS (queue-depth aware time slicing). Finally, we evaluate them by conducting a wide range of experiments using workloads generated by SPC-1 and SFS2014 on both HDD-based and all-flash platforms. Experimental results show that the combination of the two can noticeably reduce average request latency under some workloads. Deng Zhou, Vania Fang, Tao Xie 0004, Wen Pan, Ram Kesavan, Naresh Patel |
ACM Trans. Storage | 2 |
| 2016 | To Waffinity and Beyond: A Scalable Architecture for Incremental Parallelization of File System Code
Matthew Curtis-Maury, Vinay Devadas, Vania Fang |
OSDI | 3 |