Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jeffrey Yu
dblp:189/5902
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-9643-7490ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSoftware engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 77% Query processing and optimization · 23% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Graph data management › graph pattern matching › subgraph matching
subgraph isomorphism |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Subgraph Matching: A New Decomposition Based Approach · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Graph data management › graph pattern matching
subgraph matching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Subgraph Matching: A New Decomposition Based Approach · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | 8-bit Transformer Inference and Fine-tuning for Edge Accelerators · ASPLOS (3) 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
quantization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | 8-bit Transformer Inference and Fine-tuning for Edge Accelerators · ASPLOS (3) 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
edge accelerator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | 8-bit Transformer Inference and Fine-tuning for Edge Accelerators · ASPLOS (3) 2024 |
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
machine learning accelerator |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | 8-bit Transformer Inference and Fine-tuning for Edge Accelerators · ASPLOS (3) 2024 |
Query processing and optimization › join processing › multi-way join
acyclic join |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Subgraph Matching: A New Decomposition Based Approach · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Query processing and optimization
join processing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Subgraph Matching: A New Decomposition Based Approach · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
INT8 quantization · 1.5FP8 quantization · 1.5fractional hypertree width · 0.9dynamic programming · 0.9adaptive materialization · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Subgraph Matching: A New Decomposition Based ApproachabstractWe study the subgraph matching problem, which is to find all subgraph isomorphisms of a given pattern graph p in a data graph G. Traditional approaches typically use a backtracking search approach or worst-case optimal join, both of which directly operate on p. In this paper, we revisit the tree decomposition based approach. For a complex pattern graph p , we find its optimal tree decomposition T based on the fractional hypertree width, where a node in T represents a subgraph of p , which is also called a bag, and a node in p may appear in multiple bags in T. The tree decomposition based approach initially computes and materializes the matches of subgraphs specified by the bags, then treats these matches as new relations and employs an acyclic join to compute the matches of p itself. However, previous approaches fail to integrate the tree decomposition with effective join attribute orders, and conversely, previous join attribute ordering approaches do not consider the need to share computations in multiple bags. Additionally, the materialization strategies in previous tree decomposition based approaches can lead to high computation costs. In this paper, we propose a new subgraph matching algorithm ASDMatch (Adaptive Shared Decomposition-based matching). We propose a new dynamic programming approach that finds optimal attribute orders for each bag based on a cost model that incorporates the computation sharing. Furthermore, we introduce a new adaptive materialization strategy to reduce the computation cost. We confirmed that our ASDMatch outperforms state-of-the-art algorithms and can process many challenging queries that previous algorithms can not finish within the time limit. Qiyan Li 0002, Jeffrey Yu, Zongyan He |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |
| 2024 | 8-bit Transformer Inference and Fine-tuning for Edge AcceleratorsabstractTransformer models achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on natural language processing (NLP) and vision tasks, but demand significant computation and memory resources, which makes it difficult to perform inference and training (fine-tuning) on edge accelerators. Quantization to lower precision data types is a promising way to reduce computation and memory resources. Prior work has employed 8-bit integer (int8) quantization for Transformer inference, but int8 lacks the precision and range required for training. 8-bit floating-point (FP8) quantization has been used for Transformer training, but prior work only quantizes the inputs to matrix multiplications and leaves the rest of the operations in high precision. Jeffrey Yu, Kartik Prabhu, Yonatan Urman, Robert M. Radway, Eric Han, Priyanka Raina |
ASPLOS (3) | 1 |
| 2022 | Store-n-Learn: Classification and Clustering with Hyperdimensional Computing across Flash HierarchyabstractProcessing large amounts of data, especially in learning algorithms, poses a challenge for current embedded computing systems. Hyperdimensional (HD) computing (HDC) is a brain-inspired computing paradigm that works with high-dimensional vectors called hypervectors . HDC replaces several complex learning computations with bitwise and simpler arithmetic operations at the expense of an increased amount of data due to mapping the data into high-dimensional space. These hypervectors, more often than not, cannot be stored in memory, resulting in long data transfers from storage. In this article, we propose Store-n-Learn, an in-storage computing solution that performs HDC classification and clustering by implementing encoding, training, retraining, and inference across the flash hierarchy. To hide the latency of training and enable efficient computation, we introduce the concept of batching in HDC. We also present on-chip acceleration for HDC encoding in flash planes. This enables us to exploit the high parallelism provided by the flash hierarchy and encode multiple data points in parallel in both batched and non-batched fashion. Store-n-Learn also implements a single top-level FPGA accelerator with novel implementations for HDC classification training, retraining, inference, and clustering on the encoded data. Our evaluation over 10 popular datasets shows that Store-n-Learn is on average 222× (543×) faster than CPU and 10.6× (7.3×) faster than the state-of-the-art in-storage computing solution, INSIDER for HDC classification (clustering). Saransh Gupta, Behnam Khaleghi, Sahand Salamat, Justin Morris, Ranganathan Ramkumar, Jeffrey Yu, Aniket Tiwari, Jaeyoung Kang 0001, Mohsen Imani, Baris Aksanli, Tajana Rosing |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 6 |
| 2020 | THRIFTY: Training with Hyperdimensional Computing across Flash HierarchyabstractHyperdimensional computing (HDC) is a brain-inspired computing paradigm that works with high-dimensional vectors, hypervectors, instead of numbers. HDC replaces several complex learning computations with bitwise and simpler arithmetic operations, resulting in a faster and more energy-efficient learning algorithm. However, it comes at the cost of an increased amount of data to process due to mapping the data into high-dimensional space. While some datasets may nearly fit in the memory, the resulting hypervectors more often than not can't be stored in memory, resulting in long data transfers from storage. In this paper, we propose THRIFTY, an in-storage computing (ISC) solution that performs HDC encoding and training across the flash hierarchy. To hide the latency of training and enable efficient computation, we introduce the concept of batching in HDC. It allows us to split HDC training into sub-components and process them independently. We also present, for the first time, on-chip acceleration for HDC which uses simple low-power digital circuits to implement HDC encoding in Flash planes. This enables us to explore high internal parallelism provided by the flash hierarchy and encode multiple data points in parallel with negligible latency overhead. THRIFTY also implements a single top-level FPGA accelerator, which further processes the data obtained from the chips. We exploit the state-of-the-art INSIDER ISC infrastructure to implement the top-level accelerator and provide software support to THRIFTY. THRIFTY runs HDC training completely in storage while almost entirely hiding the latency of computation. Our evaluation over five popular classification datasets shows that THRIFTY is on average 1612× faster than a CPU-server and 14.4× faster than the state-of-the-art ISC solution, INSIDER for HDC encoding and training. Saransh Gupta, Justin Morris, Mohsen Imani, Ranganathan Ramkumar, Jeffrey Yu, Aniket Tiwari, Baris Aksanli, Tajana Rosing |
ICCAD | 5 |
| 2020 | Multi-label HD Classification in 3D FlashabstractMany classification problems in practice map each sample to more than one label - this is known as multi-label classification. In this work, we present Multi-label HD, an in 3D storage multi-label classification system that uses Hyperdimensional Computing (HD). Multi-label HD is the first HD system to support multi-label classification. We propose two different mappings of HD to Multi-label HD. The first, Power Set HD, transforms the multi-label problem into single-label classification by creating a new class for each label combination. The second, Multi-Model HD, creates a binary classification model for each possible label. Our evaluation shows that Multi-Model HD achieves, on average,$47.8\times$higher energy efficiency and$47.1\times$faster execution time while achieving 5% higher classification accuracy as state-of-the-art light-weight multi-label classifiers. Power Set HD achieves 13% higher accuracy than Multi-Model HD, but is$2\times$slower. Our 3D-flash acceleration further improves the energy efficiency of Multi-label HD training by$228\times$and reduces the latency by$610\times$vs training on a CPU. Justin Morris, Yilun Hao, Saransh Gupta, Ranganathan Ramkumar, Jeffrey Yu, Mohsen Imani, Baris Aksanli, Tajana Rosing |
VLSI-SOC | 5 |
| 2018 | Energetic Efficiency of a Compositional Controller on a Monoped With an Articulated Leg and SLIP DynamicsabstractEmbedding the dynamics of the Spring Loaded Inverted Pendulum (SLIP) and applying a compositional controller around it can simplify dynamic legged robot locomotion control, but what is the energetic cost of this convenience? This paper measures the magnitude of this effect in such a way that the results are applicable to a wide class of jumping robots. A three-link monoped model with revolute joints is used to compare the energetic costs of locomotion using two different control approaches: 1) SLIP-embedding with a Raibert-style controller optimized for energetic efficiency, and 2) a trajectory optimized only for energetic efficiency. By performing this comparison in simulation for a large number of different monopeds randomly sampled from a space of realistic robot designs, it is found that the SLIP-Raibert approach requires, on average, almost twice the energy of the trajectory-optimized controller to traverse a given distance. Furthermore, the increase in energetic cost does not depend much on the particulars of the robot design, as the SLIP-Raibert approach requires at least 50% more energy for approximately 88% of realistic robot designs. Jeffrey Yu, Dennis W. Hong, Matt Haberland |
IROS | 1 |